Finals System

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • swantastic
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2006
    • 7275

    Finals System

    IMO the finals should be
    1 v 5
    2 v 6
    3 v 7
    4 v 8
    The last time finals were similar to that was back in 98 when Adelaide won the flag from fifth,what are your thoughts people.?Can that work?
    Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

  • Mike_B
    Peyow Peyow
    • Jan 2003
    • 6267

    #2
    Re: Finals System

    Originally posted by swantastic
    IMO the finals should be
    1 v 5
    2 v 6
    3 v 7
    4 v 8
    The last time finals were similar to that was back in 98 when Adelaide won the flag from fifth,what are your thoughts people.?Can that work?
    That's crazy! What's the benefit in finishing 1st when you play a stronger team than the team that finished 8th?

    The old system was 1v8, 2v7, 3v6, 4v5 and gave Adelaide a 2nd chance after finishing 5th even though they were belted in week 1 of the finals.

    I much prefer the current system.

    I'm on the Chandwagon!!!

    If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.

    Comment

    • 573v30
      On the bandwagon...
      • Sep 2005
      • 5017

      #3
      Re: Re: Finals System

      Originally posted by Mike_B
      I much prefer the current system.
      Strongly agree with you there. The top 4 deserve the double chance, not the top 2. In 1998, Sydney finished 3rd on the ladder. Under the current finals system we would have made the prelims without any drama. But, under the old system we won the first game, had to play the next week, lost to Adelaide and ended up 6th. The top 4 have the double chance for a reason, because they're the most likely teams to win the premiership...
      I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

      Comment

      • Zlatorog
        Senior Player
        • Jan 2006
        • 1748

        #4
        Re: Re: Finals System

        Originally posted by Mike_B
        That's crazy! What's the benefit in finishing 1st when you play a stronger team than the team that finished 8th?

        The old system was 1v8, 2v7, 3v6, 4v5 and gave Adelaide a 2nd chance after finishing 5th even though they were belted in week 1 of the finals.

        I much prefer the current system.
        He, he, that's why it was changed, so it wouldn't happen again.

        Comment

        • ScottH
          It's Goodes to cheer!!
          • Sep 2003
          • 23665

          #5
          Re: Finals System

          Originally posted by swantastic
          IMO the finals should be
          1 v 5
          2 v 6
          3 v 7
          4 v 8
          The last time finals were similar to that was back in 98 when Adelaide won the flag from fifth,what are your thoughts people.?Can that work?
          You want to give Collingwood a better chance of winning a Flag!!

          Nope.

          Comment

          • goswannie14
            Leadership Group
            • Sep 2005
            • 11166

            #6
            My preferred system is

            WEEK 1
            Game A 1v3
            Game B 2v4
            Game C 5v7
            Game D 4v6

            WEEK 2
            Game E Loser A v Winner C
            Game F Loser B v Winner D

            WEEK 3
            PF 1 Winner A v Winner E
            PF 2 Winner B v Winner F

            WEEK 4
            GF Winner PF1 v Winner PF 2

            In this scenario Teams finishing 1 & 2 on the ladder can only meet in the GF, thus eliminating the possibility of them playing in a PF as happened last year. It also gives the top 4 teams a double chance.
            Does God believe in Atheists?

            Comment

            • ugg
              Can you feel it?
              Site Admin
              • Jan 2003
              • 15970

              #7
              Poor team 4, having to play twice in the one week

              Actually gs14, I believe the reason why that happened is the league prefers not to have the same teams play the PF as the QFs.
              Reserves live updates (Twitter)
              Reserves WIKI -
              Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

              Comment

              • desredandwhite
                Click!
                • Jan 2003
                • 2498

                #8
                The current system is actually pretty good, I reckon.

                The biggest obvious change is in the first week of finals. Each team knows EXACTLY what is at stake when they start their match.

                Top 4 - Win, and you get a home prelim. Lose, and you get a home semi.
                Bottom 4 - Win, and you get an away semi. Lose, and you get knocked out.

                Your destiny is essentially in your own hands. Much better than:

                1-2 - Win, and you get a home prelim. Lose, and you get a home semi.
                3 - Win, and you get a home prelim if one of 1/2 lose, otherwise you get a home semi. Lose, and get a home semi.
                4 - Win, and you get a home prelim if both of 1/2 lose, otherwise you get a home semi. Lose, and get a home semi.
                5 - Win, and you progress to a home prelim if 1/2/3 lose, otherwise you get a home semi. Lose, and you get knocked out if 2 or more of 6/7/8 win, otherwise you get an away semi.
                6 - Win, and you progress to a home prelim if 1/2/4 lose, otherwise you get a home semi. Lose, and you get knocked out if 2 or more of 7/8 win, otherwise you get an away semi.
                7 - Win, and you progress to a home semi. Lose, and you get knocked out.
                8 - Win, and you progress to a home semi. Lose, and you get knocked out.

                As you can see, I prefer the current system.....

                177th Senior AFL Match - Round 4, 2009 - Sydney vs Carlton, SCG. This is obviously out of date. I suppose I'll update it once I could be bothered sitting down with the fixture and working it out....
                Des' Weblog

                Comment

                • graystar
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 543

                  #9
                  I like th current system as you can get any combination of top 4 teams in the GF if they are good enough, due to cross over at semi finals.
                  I will be a member again when I return.

                  Comment

                  • ROK Lobster
                    RWO Life Member
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 8658

                    #10
                    I like the current system.

                    I would also like to see the introduction of a bottom 8 finals series, set up pretty much the same way, except that it is the losers that have to play the following week, the team losing on the last day of September taking home a wooden spoon. Sort of an anti-grand final. I think it would be great.

                    Comment

                    • BeeEmmAre
                      Commentary Team Captain
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 2509

                      #11
                      Originally posted by ROK Lobster
                      I like the current system.

                      I would also like to see the introduction of a bottom 8 finals series, set up pretty much the same way, except that it is the losers that have to play the following week, the team losing on the last day of September taking home a wooden spoon. Sort of an anti-grand final. I think it would be great.
                      Or the winners continue with the prize being the No.1 draft pick.
                      "It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.

                      YOU BETCHA!!!!!!

                      Comment

                      • ROK Lobster
                        RWO Life Member
                        • Aug 2004
                        • 8658

                        #12
                        Originally posted by BeeEmmAre
                        Or the winners continue with the prize being the No.1 draft pick.
                        Where's the public humiliation?

                        Comment

                        • BeeEmmAre
                          Commentary Team Captain
                          • Aug 2005
                          • 2509

                          #13
                          At the SCG last Sunday.
                          "It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.

                          YOU BETCHA!!!!!!

                          Comment

                          • swantastic
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2006
                            • 7275

                            #14
                            Originally posted by ROK Lobster
                            Where's the public humiliation?
                            Dont you remember 92,93 and 94? I try not too.
                            Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

                            Comment

                            Working...