West Coast Deserved It

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NMWBloods
    Taking Refuge!!
    • Jan 2003
    • 15819

    #31
    Originally posted by Damien
    Not sure I can ever watch the replay, but my feeling all day was that we were being outplayed but somehow staying close enough to make a charge
    I think part of the reason we stayed close is they weren't able to put us away, which goes to their key problem of a poor forward line.
    Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

    "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

    Comment

    • ScottH
      It's Goodes to cheer!!
      • Sep 2003
      • 23665

      #32
      Originally posted by NMWBloods
      I think part of the reason we stayed close is they weren't able to put us away, which goes to their key problem of a poor forward line.
      Yep, I think they missed just as many goals as we did.

      Comment

      • Sanecow
        Suspended by the MRP
        • Mar 2003
        • 6917

        #33
        Originally posted by ScottH
        Yep, I think they missed just as many goals as we did.
        But not nearly as many as I expected them to.

        Comment

        • liz
          Veteran
          Site Admin
          • Jan 2003
          • 16763

          #34
          Originally posted by ScottH
          Yep, I think they missed just as many goals as we did.
          They did - but probably nothing to rival the sitters that Hall and Bolton missed. Plus Monty and Tiger's mistakes gifted them two goals, and at least three others came from pretty ordinary defensive errors by Sydney. On the other hand, the O'Keefe goal had a significant element of luck / defensive error.

          Still think that West Coast were the better team but the Swans certainly managed to create enough opportunities to steal it.

          Comment

          • ScottH
            It's Goodes to cheer!!
            • Sep 2003
            • 23665

            #35
            Originally posted by liz
            They did - but probably nothing to rival the sitters that Hall and Bolton missed. Plus Monty and Tiger's mistakes gifted them two goals, and at least three others came from pretty ordinary defensive errors by Sydney. On the other hand, the O'Keefe goal had a significant element of luck / defensive error.

            Still think that West Coast were the better team but the Swans certainly managed to create enough opportunities to steal it.
            And ROK's smothered kick was another bad mistake, which resulted in a goal, too.

            Comment

            • liz
              Veteran
              Site Admin
              • Jan 2003
              • 16763

              #36
              Originally posted by ScottH
              And ROK's smothered kick was another bad mistake, which resulted in a goal, too.
              That was one of the three "others" that I referred too. There were a couple of other occasions where two Swans defenders went to the same contest and went to ground, leaving an Eagle to run onto an easy ball and stroll towards goal. One involved Richards and B2. The other was Mathews and someone else, maybe B2 as well. The first was probably Richards' error because I reckon B2 had the contest covered.

              Comment

              • The Big Cat
                On the veteran's list
                • Apr 2006
                • 2355

                #37
                You can go through all the what if's you like but as I've posted before, you change one of those and you change the whole game. You can't add up the "what ifs" because each "what if" creates more or cancels later "what ifs". If BBBH kicked the first sitter he missed, the other quoted "what ifs" don't eventuate. Besides, you can't count all the goals we kicked and then add on the misses we should have got to somehow achieve a winning total. For example - After BBBH's first miss the ball went to the wing for a fewmoments then came back in to where MOL kicked his first goal. If BBBBH kicks that first goal then MOL play doesn't happen. Perhaps if Hall kicked that goal and it goes back to the centre WCE may have kicked the next 8. Game over! Who knows? Nobody does!
                Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

                Comment

                • Agent 86
                  Senior Player
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 1686

                  #38
                  Originally posted by liz
                  One involved Richards and B2. The other was Mathews and someone else, maybe B2 as well. The first was probably Richards' error because I reckon B2 had the contest covered.
                  The Richard's one hurt the most because it gifted Hunter his first (and only) goal. And it probably was the moment that changed the momentum from being with us back to even. Can't blame Ted, though (although I might change my mind if I see a replay), as I thought he was among our best & you have to back your guys to play it how they see it.

                  As for whether they deserved it more than us... I thought they choked in 2nd half & chokers deserve to lose. They only deserved it in that they were a point in front on the final siren - had we managed another 2 points would we "not have deserved it"?
                  Last edited by Agent 86; 2 October 2006, 09:00 PM.

                  Comment

                  Working...