Jake, son of Greg Williams qualifies for Father-son

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • james_law90

    Jake, son of Greg Williams qualifies for Father-son

    this is great news for the swans. if we can pick up talent in the third round under the father-son ruling, this will greatly increase our chance of snaring the players the club needs (Everitt, Tarrant).

    Source - http://www.thedrafter.net/articles/a...s.asp?ad_id=23

    I would think we would require the second round draft pick and another fringe player (vogels or grunts) to snare Tarrant and Everitt, i'm not too sure what we would give up to get him.

    Thoughts...?

    James
  • NMWBloods
    Taking Refuge!!
    • Jan 2003
    • 15819

    #2
    He's probably going to go to Carlton.
    Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

    "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

    Comment

    • liz
      Veteran
      Site Admin
      • Jan 2003
      • 16773

      #3
      Originally posted by NMWBloods
      He's probably going to go to Carlton.
      Not necessarily. Carlton have three players eligible to be taken under the FS this year so they'll have some decisions to make about which they prefer and whether a second choice is worth a second round pick.

      I see Williams was named as one of the better Calder players in the TAC Cup final.

      Comment

      • swantastic
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2006
        • 7275

        #4
        Re: Jake, son of Greg Williams qualifies for Father-son

        Originally posted by james_law90
        this is great news for the swans. if we can pick up talent in the third round under the father-son ruling, this will greatly increase our chance of snaring the players the club needs (Everitt, Tarrant).

        Source - http://www.thedrafter.net/articles/a...s.asp?ad_id=23

        I would think we would require the second round draft pick and another fringe player (vogels or grunts) to snare Tarrant and Everitt, i'm not too sure what we would give up to get him.

        Thoughts...?

        James
        We've already got slow midfielders we need a fast one.(Apples dont fall far from the tree)
        Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

        Comment

        • dread and might
          Back, strapped and intact
          • Apr 2004
          • 949

          #5
          Re: Jake, son of Greg Williams qualifies for Father-son

          Originally posted by james_law90
          increase our chance of snaring the players the club needs (Everitt, Tarrant).

          Thoughts...?

          We do not need Tarrant. Unless we get him for nothing. There is no doubt he has talent, I just think he's been around long enough to show he's a headcase. Maybe a change of scenery is what his career needs. I'd prefer not to take the risk.
          I wish my weed was EMO so it would cut itself

          Comment

          • beejw1
            On the Rookie List
            • Jul 2003
            • 12

            #6
            We do not need Tarrant. Unless we get him for nothing. There is no doubt he has talen

            I remember two head cases named Tony Lockett and Barry Hall who came to Sydney and look what they did to change their lives and attitudes on the ground. I think Tarrant should be seriously considered especially looking at the age of O'Loughlan. I know he had a great year but may start to slow down. Imagine a fwd line of ROK, Hall, MOL and Tarrant working in tandem.

            Comment

            • dazza
              On the Rookie List
              • Feb 2004
              • 155

              #7
              I highly agree and think that Tarrant should be worth pursuing as he has talent and can play for a few years yet

              Also to try and get Everitt as well would be a huge bonus for the Swans

              Let the trade season commence

              Comment

              • dread and might
                Back, strapped and intact
                • Apr 2004
                • 949

                #8
                I guess it would be nice from a "recycyling Collingwood players" POV. Perhaps spared the spotlight of Melbourne's media circus he could come good......
                He just doesn't look like he cares about not playing well.
                I wish my weed was EMO so it would cut itself

                Comment

                • Legs Akimbo
                  Grand Poobah
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 2809

                  #9
                  Re: Re: Jake, son of Greg Williams qualifies for Father-son

                  Originally posted by swantastic
                  We've already got slow midfielders we need a fast one.(Apples dont fall far from the tree)
                  Depends who and what he mated with. Heard the one about what you get if you cross a centipede with an ostrich...?
                  He had observed that people who did lie were, on the whole, more resourceful and ambitious and successful than people who did not lie.

                  Comment

                  • james_law90

                    #10
                    Re: We do not need Tarrant. Unless we get him for nothing. There is no doubt he has talen

                    Originally posted by beejw1
                    I remember two head cases named Tony Lockett and Barry Hall who came to Sydney and look what they did to change their lives and attitudes on the ground. I think Tarrant should be seriously considered especially looking at the age of O'Loughlan. I know he had a great year but may start to slow down. Imagine a fwd line of ROK, Hall, MOL and Tarrant working in tandem.
                    Agee 100%. A froward line with the likes of thos 4 + Davis is one that people dream of. Hall, Willo and Lockett switched clubs and never dreams of playing better footy. They were stars and I know Tarrant will be one too should he choose to come to sydney.

                    Anyone have any news on Tarrant and whereabvouts we are with trades?

                    Comment

                    • dimelb
                      pr. dim-melb; m not f
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 6889

                      #11
                      The first question about a F/S pickup - Is he any good? IMO Collingwood have had their fingers badly burned by rushing in to grab sons who turned out to be blocks off the old chip. In any case I suspect we already have a better candidate for the same sort of job - young bloke called Moore.
                      I might be interested in Tarrant, but to try him in defence rather than as a forward - could do very well.
                      He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                      Comment

                      • robbieando
                        The King
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 2750

                        #12
                        Re: Re: We do not need Tarrant. Unless we get him for nothing. There is no doubt he has talen

                        Originally posted by james_law90
                        Agee 100%. A froward line with the likes of thos 4 + Davis is one that people dream of.
                        That's all we can do DREAM of it, because its pointless to go after a player that we have no need for and would cost us more than "just" a 2nd Round draft pick.

                        For starters the long-term replacement for O'Loughlin at Full Forward going forward is Heath Grundy, so why block his path to the senior team by getting a player that is questionable at best. Second of all Collingwood are after a Quick, Young Midfielder and a 1st Round Draft Pick. So unless we are all willing to give up Nick Malceski and our 1st Rounder don't EVEN BOTHER entertaining the thought of going after Tarrant.

                        He just isn't worth it at the price Collingwood will put on his head.
                        Once was, now elsewhere

                        Comment

                        • Mike
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Sep 2006
                          • 120

                          #13
                          Re: Re: Re: We do not need Tarrant. Unless we get him for nothing. There is no doubt he has talen

                          Originally posted by robbieando
                          He just isn't worth it at the price Collingwood will put on his head.
                          Hear hear.

                          Comment

                          • Triple B
                            Formerly 'BBB'
                            • Feb 2003
                            • 6999

                            #14
                            Re: Re: Re: We do not need Tarrant. Unless we get him for nothing. There is no doubt

                            Originally posted by robbieando
                            He just isn't worth it at the price Collingwood will put on his head.
                            The problem is Collingwood are neither here nor there with moving Tarrant on. This isn't an Everitt or Akermanis case where they are going, it's just a matter of getting the best deal. Unless Collingwood get their price or better he won't be moving on.

                            As Robbie say's, we most certainly do not want to pay that price.

                            BTW. Haven't we got the best forward line in the competition anyway? We need backmen and some speed in the midfield as our #1 priority. Let's not get hung up on Magic finishing in a year or 2. If Reg doesn't come up, options for forwards will always be found. Magic did start as a HBF after all.
                            Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                            Comment

                            Working...