1. Sydney being allowed to draft Matt Davis as a local rookie, when he has no connection whatever to the state apart from being drafted here by an AFL team, is an absolute freaking disgrace. What on earth are the qualifying criteria? Is the fact that you once holidayed in Sydney enough?
2. Debate raged long and hard about which local rookie(s) Sydney would take. Jacob Wooden? Evan Duryea? Matt Suckling? Ed Wilson? James Bennett? Well, actually, none of them. Not one local player who hasn't already been on an AFL list was selected by Sydney. One did get taken, though: just not by Sydney. Hawthorn thought highly enough of Suckling to take him with their 2nd pick at #22. We could've had him for nothing. Instead, we passed. Nothing to do with veterans (the spot was there) or salary caps (rookie salaries don't count).
Let's face it, we're not talking about whether these kids have shown Judd-like qualities-- 10% is at the good end of a local rookie's statistical probability of making it as an AFL player. 'Give one of 'em a go, give 'em access to the best training and support, and see what happens' is the name of the game. But no, for the sake of saving $40,000 or so, we've completely abandoned the 2006 local crop. I'm sorry, but it's hard to read that decision as anything but Sydney sticking two fingers up at the 18-yo boys who've busted a gut in local comps, for the Rams and occasionally for the Swans Reserves, this year. Nice work in developing the market, guys.
2. Debate raged long and hard about which local rookie(s) Sydney would take. Jacob Wooden? Evan Duryea? Matt Suckling? Ed Wilson? James Bennett? Well, actually, none of them. Not one local player who hasn't already been on an AFL list was selected by Sydney. One did get taken, though: just not by Sydney. Hawthorn thought highly enough of Suckling to take him with their 2nd pick at #22. We could've had him for nothing. Instead, we passed. Nothing to do with veterans (the spot was there) or salary caps (rookie salaries don't count).
Let's face it, we're not talking about whether these kids have shown Judd-like qualities-- 10% is at the good end of a local rookie's statistical probability of making it as an AFL player. 'Give one of 'em a go, give 'em access to the best training and support, and see what happens' is the name of the game. But no, for the sake of saving $40,000 or so, we've completely abandoned the 2006 local crop. I'm sorry, but it's hard to read that decision as anything but Sydney sticking two fingers up at the 18-yo boys who've busted a gut in local comps, for the Rams and occasionally for the Swans Reserves, this year. Nice work in developing the market, guys.

Comment