AFL pays $180k for Cousin's rehab

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BLT
    Razzle Dazzle
    • Aug 2006
    • 230

    AFL pays $180k for Cousin's rehab

    I heard on the radio this morning that the AFL and not the Weagles were picking up the tab for Cousins to go to rehab in the states at $3,000 a day for 60 days.

    Is this right? If so, it's an outrage! that money should be going to Auskick kids or struggling clubs or even towards lowering ticket prices for the fans....
    BLT. BOG.
  • liz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16772

    #2
    I don't understand why Cousins wouldn't pay for it himself. Does the AFL intend to pay for counselling for every player who gets himself into trouble, be it gambling addictions, anger management issues etc?

    Comment

    • AnnieH
      RWOs Black Sheep
      • Aug 2006
      • 11332

      #3
      they've set a precedent, haven't they!
      his rehab should come out of his own back pocket.
      Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
      Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

      Comment

      • Damien
        Living in 2005
        • Jan 2003
        • 3713

        #4
        Biggest joke ever if true.

        I could understand, from a duty of care point of view, West Coast hiring a therapist in PERTH to help him, but anything else needed to come from Ben.

        Comment

        • swansrock4eva
          On the Rookie List
          • Jan 2003
          • 1352

          #5
          This has to be a wind up? Aside from the precedent set, what does that teach Ben about responsibility? As much as I'd like to see him get it together, imo he needs to be the one suffering the financial hardship for it (not that you'd expect it to cause ruin the way it might an ordinary Joe Blow), if for nothing more than to help make him realise the consequences of it all! And why isn't the club contributing something seeing as they were the ones who let it go on unchecked?

          Comment

          • Margie
            Regular in the Side
            • Sep 2003
            • 800

            #6
            If that's true, it certainly does set a precedent. Did Angwin get the same treatment? What about Jon Hay?

            Comment

            • hammo
              Veterans List
              • Jul 2003
              • 5554

              #7
              This would be an absolute joke if true.

              I have no problem if his employer - the club - pays, but to have the AFL involved is disgraceful. It's almost as if they have condoned his illicit behaviour.
              "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

              Comment

              • Sanecow
                Suspended by the MRP
                • Mar 2003
                • 6917

                #8
                I heard SEN reporting that the AFL have also paid for Hall's upcoming knee reconstruction!

                Comment

                • Zlatorog
                  Senior Player
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 1748

                  #9
                  I think Cow might have a point here. Can we first confirm it's true?

                  Comment

                  • Lucky Knickers
                    Fandom of Fabulousness
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 4220

                    #10
                    Majority of large professional employers provide counselling to staff. Don't see that the AFL is any different.
                    I don't have a problem with either the AFL, AFLPA or any club providing financial assistance to getting an employee right. Whether it's a knee reco or a lobotomy.
                    Who do you think does pay for all the surgeries? I'd speculate it's NOT the players funding the medicare gap.

                    Comment

                    • stellation
                      scott names the planets
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 9720

                      #11
                      It is not out of the ordinary for an employer to pay for rehab/counselling of one of their employees, in pro sports there may be a blurred line on this between whether the club or the league pays. I don't have an issue with the AFL paying for it at all.
                      I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                      We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                      Comment

                      • ScottH
                        It's Goodes to cheer!!
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 23665

                        #12
                        It is understood the AFL will, at least in part, pay the bill for his treatment program and travel to the US.
                        Source

                        Comment

                        • sWAns63
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Apr 2003
                          • 572

                          #13
                          All Afl brands WCE, Syd Swans etc. are controlled by the AFL if they the AFL are aware of the the drug culture in the WCE as they were, the AFL has to take reasonable steps to stop it.
                          I guess that what it comes down to is they didn't so the AFL is responsible...at least in part.
                          It stinks

                          Comment

                          • swantastic
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2006
                            • 7275

                            #14
                            What a load of crap that the AFL is paying for it,i bet every ones boss wouldn't pay for treatment if an employee was on drugs.
                            Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

                            Comment

                            • sWAns63
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Apr 2003
                              • 572

                              #15
                              I guess if there were a few people at your workplace as with WCE taking drugs and your employer knows about and you get hooked that employer has to be at least partly responsible for allowing it to continue

                              Comment

                              Working...