Chick is scum with no credibility

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cruiser
    What the frack!
    • Jul 2004
    • 6114

    Chick is scum with no credibility

    Just when you thought that Daniel Chick couldn't stoop any lower ...
    Occupational hazards:
    I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
    - animal psychic Amanda de Warren
  • 573v30
    On the bandwagon...
    • Sep 2005
    • 5017

    #2
    It should've been an automatic suspension for lying to the tribunal, having no case and obviously reluctant to back up his claims. Pathetic.
    I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

    Comment

    • dread and might
      Back, strapped and intact
      • Apr 2004
      • 949

      #3
      one of my fondest memories is of dunkley "mistiming" a spoil and hitting the (then) Hawk in the head.
      I wish my weed was EMO so it would cut itself

      Comment

      • AnnieH
        RWOs Black Sheep
        • Aug 2006
        • 11332

        #4
        what a tosser.
        the criminals are a dirty bunch.
        Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
        Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

        Comment

        • goswannie14
          Leadership Group
          • Sep 2005
          • 11166

          #5
          I already knew he was scum with no credibility, but in this case he should have a case to answer. If anyone should be taking legal action for having their name besmirched it should be Carr against Chick.
          Does God believe in Atheists?

          Comment

          • Margie
            Regular in the Side
            • Sep 2003
            • 800

            #6
            Originally posted by goswannie14
            I already knew he was scum with no credibility, but in this case he should have a case to answer. If anyone should be taking legal action for having their name besmirched it should be Carr against Chick.
            Reported on Fox Sports News that Chick was arrogant and refusing to answer questions. Must be the quickest decision ever made at the tribunal. The Eagles definitely have a culture problem and unfortunately it reflects badly on AFL in general and in particular to those who follow other sports.

            Comment

            • Chow-Chicker
              Senior Player
              • Jun 2006
              • 1602

              #7
              Chick should receive the 3 week suspension that Carr was facing.

              There is an obvious culture of being deceitful and untruthful on dispicable proportions within the club.

              Although there are some on RWO who seem to think they are "misunderstood".....
              Last edited by Chow-Chicker; 19 April 2007, 10:38 AM.

              Comment

              • nat
                On the Rookie List
                • Oct 2006
                • 501

                #8
                Chick appeared agitated throughout his testimony. He yawned, refused to answer a question about when he left the field, talked down to Donaldson and regularly referred to him as "mate" and "buddy".
                Haha, he's a tool.

                Comment

                • woo
                  double vodka lemon pls
                  • Sep 2005
                  • 961

                  #9
                  you know, I ahve been following footy for a long time, over different codes, I dont reckon I have ever heard a case like this before. I agree...Chick should be suspended or at the very least fined by his own club.

                  I am trying to stay very unbiased towards the eagles but every week something happens...no other club has the behaviour problems which are appearing here at the moment. Sorry I have just zero sympathy for them anymore.
                  you know what they say, dirty pants- clean botty

                  Comment

                  • Carolyn
                    Randomness muchly
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 986

                    #10
                    The tribunal has the power to suspend or fine a player for giving unsatisfactory evidence, but did not exercise that power last night.
                    And why didn't they??
                    My Pokemon brings all the boys to the yard and they're like "Wanna trade cards?"
                    "Damn right, I wanna trade cards. I can beat you, I've got Charizard!"

                    Comment

                    • cruiser
                      What the frack!
                      • Jul 2004
                      • 6114

                      #11
                      In one article I read today the journo (a Dockers supporter) referred to them as the West Coast Evils.
                      Occupational hazards:
                      I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
                      - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

                      Comment

                      • hammo
                        Veterans List
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 5554

                        #12
                        Chick is an absolute grub. he is just wasting everyone's time and should be fined or suspended by the AFL.

                        The AFL should also slap the Eagles with a heavy fine as they are the ones who lodged the complaint and for good measure include it under their salary cap. That should wipe the smile of Trevor Nesbitt's arrogant dial once and for all.
                        "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                        Comment

                        • cruiser
                          What the frack!
                          • Jul 2004
                          • 6114

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Carolyn
                          And why didn't they??
                          Well you might ask. Why do they also consider Selwood's comments about a woman to be OK. Why have they not taken action against Kerr for his drug use? What about the Evils player flatlining in Vegas? On and on it goes and the AFL sits on its hands and does almost nothing while the Evils snigger away to themselves, seemingly untouchable.
                          Occupational hazards:
                          I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
                          - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

                          Comment

                          • swansrock4eva
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 1352

                            #14
                            That's the biggest problem - the untouchable image they have developed through the AFLs weakness. When you read the accounts of Chick's testimony, it is so blatant the lack of respect that was there, and it's so very typical these days - they have no respect, no scruples and nothing is being done to fix it, to let them know they need to pull their heads in. It reflects so poorly on the whole league, and makes our administrators look so incompetent it's not funny.

                            Comment

                            • snajik
                              Senior Player
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 1115

                              #15
                              Originally posted by cruiser
                              Well you might ask. Why do they also consider Selwood's comments about a woman to be OK. Why have they not taken action against Kerr for his drug use? What about the Evils player flatlining in Vegas? On and on it goes and the AFL sits on its hands and does almost nothing while the Evils snigger away to themselves, seemingly untouchable.
                              Plus they get an armchair ride from the umpires. It will leave a very sour taste in many a mouth if these arrogant toss bags somehow pull off another premiership.

                              I was dismayed to hear that Nick Stevens won't be playing this weekend which I thought would lessen Carlton's chance of victory. Then I thought, "Hang on, I've never wanted Carlton to win a game ever". Times must be a changing.
                              It's very hard to live in a studio apartment in San Jose with a man who's learning to play violin. That's what she told the police when she handed them the empty revolver.
                              The Scarlatti Tilt - Richard Brautigan

                              Comment

                              Working...