Chick is scum with no credibility

[giant]

I know the lawyer well - he would have had Chick looking like a chook.

[NMWBloods]

The AFL should fine West Coast for what was obviously a trumped-up charge.

[573v30]

Plus they get an armchair ride from the umpires. It will leave a very sour taste in many a mouth if these arrogant toss bags somehow pull off another premiership.

And that's what many of their fans ultimately care about as shown time and time again on BigFooty aka BigEagle (well we're the premiers = lame comeback). Chick had no reason to single out Carr and he shouldn't have even bothered testifying when he had no evidence whatsoever.

[Damien]

I'd love to hear an explanation from the Tribunal as to why they didn't exercise their right to discipline Chick for his unsatisfactory evidence.

[DeadlyAkkuret]

That's the biggest problem - the untouchable image they have developed through the AFLs weakness. When you read the accounts of Chick's testimony, it is so blatant the lack of respect that was there, and it's so very typical these days - they have no respect, no scruples and nothing is being done to fix it, to let them know they need to pull their heads in. It reflects so poorly on the whole league, and makes our administrators look so incompetent it's not funny.

They should be losing premiership points for all the times they've brought the game into disrepute. 20 points seems fair.

[bandwagon]

WCE = proof that there is more to football than winning.

[giant]

WCE = proof that there is more to football than winning.

Hear hear.

[16.SFC]

Apparently Chick's evidence is going to be reviewed by the AFL.

Let's hope they see Chick's effort for what it was - blatant lies.

Source

[Chow-Chicker]

Apparently Chick's evidence is going to be reviewed by the AFL.

Let's hope they see Chick's effort for what it was - blatant lies.

Source

And he should be forthrightly suspended. You can't treat this game with utter contempt and get away with it. Dispicable.

[cruiser]

Apparently Chick's evidence is going to be reviewed by the AFL.

Let's hope they see Chick's effort for what it was - blatant lies.

Source

The AFL states that it hasnt received an official complaint about Chick's behaviour yet. How does one lodge such an official complaint?

[hammo]

The AFL states that it hasnt received an official complaint about Chick's behaviour yet. How does one lodge such an official complaint?

Surely they could lodge one themselves!

[16.SFC]

The AFL states that it hasnt received an official complaint about Chick's behaviour yet. How does one lodge such an official complaint?

Maybe RWO could band together and lodge a class action against Chick - for bringing the game into disrepute - and for playing the the Evils.

[Chow-Chicker]

The AFL states that it hasnt received an official complaint about Chick's behaviour yet.

So why has Anderson made a comment then? Does anyone know what they're doing in the AFL????????????

[giant]

Doesn't really matter what the AFL does - Chick will be judged by his peers every week for the rest of his career.

[573v30]

Doesn't really matter what the AFL does - Chick will be judged by his peers every week for the rest of his career.

His teammates are probably congratulating him for his "efforts."