Dirty Tactics!

[Chow-Chicker]

Again you are inventing things. I've not been apologetic towards WC. Rather I've observed your pathological obsession - "he must be guilty because he's from WC". Yes, now that's sensible...

Haha, what a classic hypocrite you are. I'm inventing things because I point out indescretions from players that happen to play for WC.

You've "observed a pathological obsession - he must be guilty because he's from WC". Seems like you are somehow dry reaching a bit. I'm supposedly the one with a pathological obsession....but not you with a propensity to invent imaginery motives. How old are you, child?

Perhaps, again, you should put away your biases and remove your blinkers so you can focus on the facts and the truth. Try it, it can't be that hard....

And while you're at it....what do you think of Judd's tactics? Try and make an effort to respond to the topic of the post (if you can).

[NMWBloods]

Haha, what a classic hypocrite you are. I'm inventing things because I point out indescretions from players that happen to play for WC.

How does that make me a hypocrite? Most of the time you comment about other sides it's to find something negative to say about WC.

You've "observed a pathological obsession - he must be guilty because he's from WC". Seems like you are somehow dry reaching a bit. I'm supposedly the one with a pathological obsession....but not you with a propensity to invent imaginery motives. How old are you, child?

"Dry reaching"...?
Not invented...

Perhaps, again, you should put away your biases and remove your blinkers so you can focus on the facts and the truth. Try it, it can't be that hard....

That's what I've been doing - given that many of your posts are about WC, I think you are the one who should try that.

And while you're at it....what do you think of Judd's tactics? Try and make an effort to respond to the topic of the post (if you can).

I haven't seen it. Strange though that there hasn't been a single comment on it on BF, except for one guy say Judd slapped Johnson's broken hand.

I've made myself clear on these sorts of tactics time and time again, however when players are being heavily tagged they often will strike back at their tagger (eg: Goodes against Godfrey, Bruce against McVeigh, etc etc etc). As Big Al said, this type of action is not a good look but hardly unusual or the worst thing to happen on the ground.

[Chow-Chicker]

I haven't seen it. Strange though that there hasn't been a single comment on it on BF, except for one guy say Judd slapped Johnson's broken hand.

Footage was shown on the 5th Quarter. It was a punch and not a slap.

So what are you insinuating? I made it up? Grow up....

[NMWBloods]

Again you make things up. All I said was no one had made a big fuss of it, so obviously it didn't seem to be a big deal to anyone else.

[Chow-Chicker]

Again you make things up. All I said was no one had made a big fuss of it, so obviously it didn't seem to be a big deal to anyone else.

How do you draw that conclusion? If a footy program decides to highlight the incident, they obviously thought it was a big deal. I couldn't care less if it were Judd, Goodes, Farmer, whoever....it was a dirty tactic.

[NMWBloods]

You're getting the sequence of comments out of order...

[Chow-Chicker]

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,21638885%255E19742,00.html

[Frog]

Whilst the thread itself is not a problem here, it has turned into a slanging match by two people. Please take your disagreement off the boards as per RWO rule 2.

2) Flaming/abusive threads
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the board. Everyone else doesn''t need to see your hissy
fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". If you don''t like a post, please don''t flame back - it makes our job
of moderation much harder. Just report the post to a moderator and let us handle it.

This thread has been closed.