Double Standards?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ScottH
    It's Goodes to cheer!!
    • Sep 2003
    • 23665

    Double Standards?

    Raw deal for Ramanauskus
    Essendon greats are outraged that the AFL granted West Coast salary-cap concessions while Cousins underwent a $60,000 drug rehabilitation program, but rejected Essendon's bid for concessions to cover Ramanauskas's bills for cancer treatment.
    "Rama finds himself in a tough predicament through no fault of his and needs help," he said.

    "The other bloke has made a decision and gone down a path that involves illicit drugs and he gets the help. It's not fair."
  • goswannie14
    Leadership Group
    • Sep 2005
    • 11166

    #2
    I am certainly no Essendon fan, but this goes beyond that. It is just wrong that Essendon is not allowed an exemption for his cancer treatment. Unethical, hypocritical and just plain stupid. It really sums up the AFL under the Fat Controller and Anderson...pathetic.
    Does God believe in Atheists?

    Comment

    • swansrock4eva
      On the Rookie List
      • Jan 2003
      • 1352

      #3
      Also:
      Essendon chief executive Peter Jackson said the club was told its 2003 request for a salary cap exemption was rejected because the illness was not a "football injury"
      Firstly, how is becoming addicted to drugs a football injury? A ruptured ACL I can understand, a drug addiciton I cannot! "Oh dammit I just fell over and my nose happened to land right on this rolled up $100 note just as I breathed in..."

      And I wonder what the outcome might have been if it was Rama on drugs and Cousins with cancer instead?

      Comment

      • BBBBH
        Warming the Bench
        • Apr 2007
        • 147

        #4
        Originally posted by swansrock4eva
        Also:


        Firstly, how is becoming addicted to drugs a football injury? A ruptured ACL I can understand, a drug addiciton I cannot! "Oh dammit I just fell over and my nose happened to land right on this rolled up $100 note just as I breathed in..."

        And I wonder what the outcome might have been if it was Rama on drugs and Cousins with cancer instead?
        "Cuzzy finds himself in a tough predicament through no fault of his and needs help," he said.

        "The other bloke has made a decision and gone down a path that involves illicit drugs and he gets the help. It's not fair."

        Comment

        • Chow-Chicker
          Senior Player
          • Jun 2006
          • 1602

          #5
          The walls need to be torn down at AFL House and a big bloody broom brought in to sweep out the @@@@. This is totally unacceptable. I suspect those within the AFL have sympathy for Cousins because they have experienced what he's gone through but they haven't experienced Rama's condition.

          Comment

          • swantastic
            Veterans List
            • Jan 2006
            • 7275

            #6
            I know what cancer does to people,my mum died from it and IMO the AFL are a bloody disgrace.All the other 14 clubs should get behind Essendon and go the AFL hard take them to court what ever it takes so they reverse the decision for wet toast or at least reimburse Essendon.
            Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

            Comment

            • dimelb
              pr. dim-melb; m not f
              • Jun 2003
              • 6889

              #7
              This stinks.
              He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

              Comment

              • liz
                Veteran
                Site Admin
                • Jan 2003
                • 16773

                #8
                Oops.

                I think most people arguing "for" WCE getting the relief were doing so on the basis that any reasonable medical expenses would qualify for such relief. It is clearly daft that a "no fault" non-football related illness doesn't qualify when one that includes some element of culpability on part of the patient does.

                Did someone at the AFL seriously mess-up and not realise that Essendon's request was rejected?

                Comment

                • Chow-Chicker
                  Senior Player
                  • Jun 2006
                  • 1602

                  #9
                  This goes in line with supplying free syringes to addicts while diabetics have to pay for theirs. Laughable and sickening at the same time.

                  Comment

                  • goswannie14
                    Leadership Group
                    • Sep 2005
                    • 11166

                    #10
                    Are scans and other medical procedures carried out on players included in the salary cap?
                    Does God believe in Atheists?

                    Comment

                    • reigning premier
                      Suspended by the MRP
                      • Sep 2006
                      • 4335

                      #11
                      People... Calm the @@@@ down.....

                      This is another media beat up by the Horrible Sun and those media shy bastards out at Windy Hill....

                      The salary cap concessions were given to WCE to accomodate the increasing costs of living in Perth. Sydney gets the same for the exact same reasons. i.e. A house here cost $700k as opposed to what it costs in Melbourne/Adelaide/Brisbane. Believe it or not, Perth is the same.

                      The concessions have nothing to do with player treatments for injuries/afflictions.

                      How teams and their players treat and pay for the injuries and rehabilitation has nothing to do with the salary cap. Just another case of Essendon crying poor....

                      Comment

                      • ScottH
                        It's Goodes to cheer!!
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 23665

                        #12
                        Originally posted by goswannie14
                        Are scans and other medical procedures carried out on players included in the salary cap?
                        No. Any football injuries and rehabs are outside the cap, AFAIK.

                        Comment

                        • ScottH
                          It's Goodes to cheer!!
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 23665

                          #13
                          Originally posted by reigning premier
                          People... Calm the @@@@ down.....

                          This is another media beat up by the Horrible Sun and those media shy bastards out at Windy Hill....

                          The salary cap concessions were given to WCE to accomodate the increasing costs of living in Perth. Sydney gets the same for the exact same reasons. i.e. A house here cost $700k as opposed to what it costs in Melbourne/Adelaide/Brisbane. Believe it or not, Perth is the same.

                          The concessions have nothing to do with player treatments for injuries/afflictions.

                          How teams and their players treat and pay for the injuries and rehabilitation has nothing to do with the salary cap. Just another case of Essendon crying poor....
                          I don't think so.

                          It's a case of 2 clubs asking for help with a non football related "illness", and one gets a Yes, for a self inflicted "illness", while the other gets a No, due to an illness that a player has absolutely, no control over.

                          Now the AFL has set a precedent, any club applying for the same thing should be given a YES.

                          Comment

                          • goswannie14
                            Leadership Group
                            • Sep 2005
                            • 11166

                            #14
                            Originally posted by reigning premier
                            People... Calm the @@@@ down.....

                            This is another media beat up by the Horrible Sun and those media shy bastards out at Windy Hill....

                            The salary cap concessions were given to WCE to accomodate the increasing costs of living in Perth. Sydney gets the same for the exact same reasons. i.e. A house here cost $700k as opposed to what it costs in Melbourne/Adelaide/Brisbane. Believe it or not, Perth is the same.

                            The concessions have nothing to do with player treatments for injuries/afflictions.

                            How teams and their players treat and pay for the injuries and rehabilitation has nothing to do with the salary cap. Just another case of Essendon crying poor....
                            I think you will find that the facts speak differently to what you are telling us...Eagles after salary cap relief for Cousins saga
                            Does God believe in Atheists?

                            Comment

                            • reigning premier
                              Suspended by the MRP
                              • Sep 2006
                              • 4335

                              #15
                              Seems like I'm out of touch....

                              Anyways, neither should get any salary cap relief.

                              Comment

                              Working...