Some stats for round 8

[swantastic]

Efficiency Kings
Teddy 100%
Macca 100%
Leo 100 %
Melcho %
The rest of the players ranged from 72%(B1) to 92%(Davo) which is pretty good.

Every body had a few clangers,except for Melcho

BOG for the Swans,Tiger,MOL,Noggy,Leo and Melcho.

Goals came from Free's 1,Play 6 and Marks 10

Frees for 25,FA 28 so not so bad.

The only player with no tackles was Tiger,I wonder why?
The Swans had 4 fewer I50 entries than Port but had 46 effective disposals compared to Ports 32.

There was a few players down on there form Tiger,Hally,Captain,Jolly,ROK,Schneider and Fossie.
The players up were Noggy,MOL,Melcho,B2,Leo,B1,Nick,Goodes,Spida,Benny ,Macca,Bevan, and the rest were about the same.

The I50's went Melcho,Noggy 6,Hall,Davo 4.
Clearences Noggy 7,B1,Monty 4.

[Alibi Monday]

out of interest, where did you get this data from?

[ScottH]

out of interest, where did you get this data from?

Herald Sun (Melb), who source their data from Champion Data.

[swantastic]

Herald Sun (Melb), who source their data from Champion Data.

Thanks for spoiling my fun

[Alibi Monday]

Herald Sun (Melb), who source their data from Champion Data.

But some of that data is not on their site, such as clearances and I50s etc. Is this exclusive to the print version?

[ScottH]

But some of that data is not on their site, such as clearances and I50s etc. Is this exclusive to the print version?

Yes.

[swantastic]

But some of that data is not on their site, such as clearances and I50s etc. Is this exclusive to the print version?

Some of the stuff is in print but not on the web and visa versa.All the data isnt on the AFL site either or the Herald Sun site,go figure.AM if you need any more stats ask and if i can help i will.

[stellation]

Some of the stuff is in print but not on the web and visa versa.All the data isnt on the AFL site either or the Herald Sun site,go figure.AM if you need any more stats ask and if i can help i will.

Hello handsome- how many contested possessions and clearances for
ROK
Davo
Kirk
Goodes

[swantastic]

Hello handsome- how many contested possessions and clearances for
ROK
Davo
Kirk
Goodes

At least some one thinks so.

ROK=7 con/2 clear
Davo=3/1
Kirk=7/2
Goodes=3/1
B1=9/4 Just thought i would throw him in.

[ugg]

Hitout to advantages - I thought Spida got quite a few yesterday. Care to back up my hunch, stattastic?

[NMWBloods]

Hitout to advantages - I thought Spida got quite a few yesterday. Care to back up my hunch, stattastic?

Everitt was excellent yesterday - I don't think that's really been recognised a great deal.

[reigning premier]

Hitout to advantages - I thought Spida got quite a few yesterday. Care to back up my hunch, stattastic?

Don't know what the stats will say, But Lade was Spida's biatch yesterday..... Owned his knuckle dragging ass.... Jolly gave him a towelling up as well.

I did feel for Lade though. He was up against two ruckmen in form and he had absolutely no support whatsoever. Brogan was crap and Tredrea was bad enough to get dragged at one stage. By game's end, he was exhausted.

[swantastic]

Hitout to advantages - I thought Spida got quite a few yesterday. Care to back up my hunch, stattastic?

Nope Lade was better he had 18 HO with 33% Adv while Spida had 21 HO with 24% Adv.Over all the Swans had 39 HO/18% ADV while Port had 30 HO/23% ADV.

Sorry guys to dissapoint you.

[cruiser]

Everitt was excellent yesterday - I don't think that's really been recognised a great deal.

We dominated centre with great ruck work by Spida and Jolly.

Some of us have. His dominance in the ruck was particularly noticeable during the first quarter.

[ugg]

Don't know what the stats will say, But Lade was Spida's biatch yesterday..... Owned his knuckle dragging ass.... Jolly gave him a towelling up as well.

I did feel for Lade though. He was up against two ruckmen in form and he had absolutely no support whatsoever. Brogan was crap and Tredrea was bad enough to get dragged at one stage. By game's end, he was exhausted.

Didn't Brogan get injured and that forced Lade to ruck longer than usual.