I know Dermott is not to everyone's taste but I was always a fan of the insights he gave into specific nuances of the game - rather than just stating the bland obvious that is the trade of most commentators.
Here he provides - in written form this time - an interesting critique of Hall's game last weekend.
There are a couple of minor issues I'd take issue with - like the suggestion that his team mates are looking for alternative options more, something that was maybe true against the Power and Dogs but hasn't been obvious in most other games. And I am not sure which the two "no-brainer" frees are that he refers to. Presumably the hip and shoulder one is not one of the two, given there have been no rules changes that make that a free this year and not last.
In any case, it's a pretty interesting read, despite coming from the Hun.
Here he provides - in written form this time - an interesting critique of Hall's game last weekend.
There are a couple of minor issues I'd take issue with - like the suggestion that his team mates are looking for alternative options more, something that was maybe true against the Power and Dogs but hasn't been obvious in most other games. And I am not sure which the two "no-brainer" frees are that he refers to. Presumably the hip and shoulder one is not one of the two, given there have been no rules changes that make that a free this year and not last.
In any case, it's a pretty interesting read, despite coming from the Hun.

@@@@ing Nuff nuffs.
Comment