WC could be counting the cost of Cousins / Eagles investigation (merged thread)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • goswannie14
    Leadership Group
    • Sep 2005
    • 11166

    #31
    Originally posted by Annie Haddad
    Don't you roll your eyes at me sonny!!

    (She says, poking her finger into his chest).

    I was wishful thinking out loud. Can we still try for option 2???
    Plllleeeeaaaaasssssseeeeeeeeeeee
    Actually Annie the rolleyes was at the Fat Controller not wanting to call an earlier meeting of the commission to deal with the problem. I wonder if it is because he doesn't want to come back from his holidays?
    Does God believe in Atheists?

    Comment

    • swantastic
      Veterans List
      • Jan 2006
      • 7275

      #32
      Originally posted by Chow-Chicker
      Ah yes, you see, WCE had a "duty of care" to the AFL and they failed to protect the reputation of the league and their sponsors.

      What dya reckon hammo?
      Great point CC.
      Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

      Comment

      • reigning premier
        Suspended by the MRP
        • Sep 2006
        • 4335

        #33
        Originally posted by Sanecow
        Factually incorrect.
        More than once is repeatedley

        Comment

        • swantastic
          Veterans List
          • Jan 2006
          • 7275

          #34
          Originally posted by chaz
          you guys are all a bunch of dick heads you all have the @@@@s cos he carved it up last time you played,and if you think hes the only guy in the afl on the gear think again i can guarantee you that there are swans players on it so if you want wc to lose points for it better hope noone from the swans gets caught!!
          Alright big mouth name the Swans.

          Benny is an idiot plain and simple.
          Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

          Comment

          • goswannie14
            Leadership Group
            • Sep 2005
            • 11166

            #35
            Originally posted by chaz
            i can guarantee you that there are swans players on it so if you want wc to lose points for it better hope noone from the swans gets caught!!
            Where's your proof? It's fine to make statements, but if you have no proof it's BS.
            Does God believe in Atheists?

            Comment

            • Sanecow
              Suspended by the MRP
              • Mar 2003
              • 6917

              #36
              Originally posted by reigning premier
              More than once is repeatedley
              According to the AFL:

              1. Three players have tested positive twice for illicit drug use. Source

              2. Cousins has never tested positive for illicit drugs. Source

              Comment

              • hammo
                Veterans List
                • Jul 2003
                • 5554

                #37
                Originally posted by swantastic
                Great point CC.
                "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                Comment

                • reigning premier
                  Suspended by the MRP
                  • Sep 2006
                  • 4335

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Sanecow
                  According to the AFL:

                  1. Three players have tested positive twice for illicit drug use. Source

                  2. Cousins has never tested positive for illicit drugs. Source
                  1. Tuesday. Caught in posession, refused test.
                  2. Banned for 6mths by club for turning up to training in an unacceptable state.

                  Comment

                  • swantastic
                    Veterans List
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 7275

                    #39
                    Originally posted by hammo
                    WCE had a "duty of care" to the AFL and they failed to protect the reputation of the league and their sponsors
                    Hammo if people think the AFL and WC have a duty of care to Benny boy,well Beeny and WC have a duty of care to the AFL.
                    Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

                    Comment

                    • Sanecow
                      Suspended by the MRP
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 6917

                      #40
                      Originally posted by reigning premier
                      1. Tuesday. Caught in posession, refused test.
                      2. Banned for 6mths by club for turning up to training in an unacceptable state.
                      It's irrelevant (and debatable) whether or not Cousins has been "caught repeatedly" when the fact that three others have been caught is enough to demonstrate that "he's the only one dumb enough to get caught repeatedly" is factually incorrect. QED.

                      Comment

                      • AnnieH
                        RWOs Black Sheep
                        • Aug 2006
                        • 11332

                        #41
                        Originally posted by goswannie14
                        Actually Annie the rolleyes was at the Fat Controller not wanting to call an earlier meeting of the commission to deal with the problem. I wonder if it is because he doesn't want to come back from his holidays?
                        I know. I was trying to be funny.

                        He wants to wait until the after the world cup final ... he has tickets.
                        Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                        Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                        Comment

                        • reigning premier
                          Suspended by the MRP
                          • Sep 2006
                          • 4335

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Sanecow
                          It's irrelevant (and debatable) whether or not Cousins has been "caught repeatedly" when the fact that three others have been caught is enough to demonstrate that "he's the only one dumb enough to get caught repeatedly" is factually incorrect. QED.
                          Not debatable.

                          But yes. Others have been caught as well.

                          I'll correct my statement.

                          He's the only one stupid enough to get caught repeatedley in such spectacular circumstances.

                          Comment

                          • R&WtilIDie
                            Blood 4 ever
                            • Oct 2007
                            • 105

                            #43
                            The Eagles wont be hauled in front of the AFL commission again, because they handled it already. They sacked him. They we only in trouble before because they were too lenient. Therefore, they wont be docked any points or draft picks. Nor should they.

                            Comment

                            • robbieando
                              The King
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 2750

                              #44
                              Originally posted by goswannie14
                              Given that the Fat Controller said this morning, in an interview on ABC radio, that the commission weren't meeting until November sometime (ie. after the draft) it would be pretty difficult for them to take away their draft picks.
                              The AFL Commission is meeting on November 19 and the AFL National Draft is November 24, so the Eagles could very well lose their picks. But I doubt they will lose any picks because the Eagles acted to delist Cousins so quick.

                              But if they do lose picks 5 days before the draft it is nothing compared to the 2 days Carlton had in 2002 when they lost 2 rounds worth of picks for their salary cap breeches after a AFL Commission meeting.
                              Once was, now elsewhere

                              Comment

                              • ernie koala
                                Senior Player
                                • May 2007
                                • 3251

                                #45
                                Originally posted by chaz
                                you guys are all a bunch of dick heads you all have the @@@@s cos he carved it up last time you played,and if you think hes the only guy in the afl on the gear think again i can guarantee you that there are swans players on it so if you want wc to lose points for it better hope noone from the swans gets caught!!
                                Tell em chaz, are you play acting, or are you a village idiot in real life ?
                                Concentrate chaz....watch the birdy.
                                Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                                Comment

                                Working...