Swans 22 for Rd 1 (Teams named)
Collapse
X
-
My 22
B - Richards, Bolton, Barry
HB - Kennelly, LRT, Mattner
C - Ablett, Goodes, Bolton
HF - Buchanan, Hall, O'Keefe
F - Davis, O'Loughlin, McVeigh
Rucks - Jolly, Kirk, Fosdike
I/C - Everitt, Barlow, Bevan, Schmidt
Emergencies - Bird, Grundy, Jack
If Malceski is fit .. slot him in for Bolton ... drop Bevan from the bench
The team with Malceski in is stonger on paper than the Premiership team... big call i know ... to me the big question marks are whether Hall, Barry and Kirk can maintain their performance given they are over 30 .. good depth too ... with Matthews, Crouch, Brennan, Laidlaw, Playfair all unlucky (that's 400 games plus experience on tap to replace poor performers/injury)...
There is no excuses -top 4 this year ... as you can see i am very excited about our chances this year!
Comment
-
I just like the way we're going in to 2008 without the "grand finalist" bull@@@@ pressure behind us.
I think it's made a difference.Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.Comment
-
I'd rather not have Davis in the side. I'm tired of his skitting and mazza type play. Reality says he will be selected, but if he continues to be a passenger, dump him immediately. Other than that, the rest is OK.Comment
-
B - Richards, Bolton, Barry
HB - Kennelly, LRT, Mattner
C - Ablett, Goodes, Bolton
HF - Buchanan, Hall, O'Keefe
F - Davis, O'Loughlin, McVeigh
Rucks - Jolly, Kirk, Fosdike
I/C - Everitt, Barlow, Bevan, Schmidt
Emergencies - Bird, Grundy, Jack
If Malceski is fit .. slot him in for Bolton ... drop Bevan from the benchWhenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MTComment
-
Originally posted by Dr DiabolicalYeah, those 33 goals last year weren't much use (second most goals per game for the team)...Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr DiabolicalDavis' job is to kick goals - he does that very well. He also contributes in the forward line not too dissimilar to MOL and not much behind Hall (who is clearly the main target). He also gives away less free kicks than either of them, has less clangers, and clears the ball more often, and has less time on ground.
Per game
Hall 1.2 assists, 1.2 tackles, 2.4 I50s, 0.0 clearances, 3.2 clangers
Davis 0.7 assists, 1.3 tackles, 2.3 I50s, 1.3 clearances, 1.6 clangers
MOL 0.9 assists, 1.4 tackles, 1.7 I50s, 0.3 clearances, 2.0 clangersComment
-
Everyone thinks Davo could be even more....suggesting he should be dropped is really ridiculous."I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005Comment
-
I have a gut feeling that Birdy, will play in all 22 games, and hopefully take home the AFL's Rising Star Award.Comment
-
I had a gut feeling.
I sat on the toilet for a while ....
(Sorry guys, I couldn't resist!!)Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.Comment
-
And you can avoid the facts all you want but saying Davis doesn't do the things he actually does do is just plain, well I would like to say stupid, but blind is probably more accurate.
Everyone thinks Davo could be even more....suggesting he should be dropped is really ridiculous.Comment
-
If Davis finally starts playing to his potential, and
If Barry Hall really can see and move this year, and
If Goodes is in the form he seems to be in, and
If the kids like Bird fit in, and
If Kennelly comes back as good as ever, and
If we have no major injuries (ie those players listed above)
I think we could go Top Four - and that Premiership membership premium could even be worthwhile.Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr DiabolicalDavis' job is to kick goals - he does that very well. He also contributes in the forward line not too dissimilar to MOL and not much behind Hall (who is clearly the main target). He also gives away less free kicks than either of them, has less clangers, and clears the ball more often, and has less time on ground.
Per game
Hall 1.2 assists, 1.2 tackles, 2.4 I50s, 0.0 clearances, 3.2 clangers
Davis 0.7 assists, 1.3 tackles, 2.3 I50s, 1.3 clearances, 1.6 clangers
MOL 0.9 assists, 1.4 tackles, 1.7 I50s, 0.3 clearances, 2.0 clangers
Im not a Davis fan either same as Chow Chicker, though he is in our best 22; no doubt. He kicks goals !!
Assists : Least out of the 3. Looks after himself most of the time.
Tackles : For a mobile player doesnt work hard enough
Inside 50s : The other 2 play forward all the time . Davo is in the middle and up the ground far more than them.
Clearances : As Above.
Clangers : For a guy of his abiliity and skills and the amount of disposals he gets per game ( Averages 12 ) is poor
Look, he just a guy I wish would give more as he could be anything.Go get it , chase makes things happen. Just dont demand it all the time and then get @@@@ty when they dont kick it to him . Micky O was a gun when Plugger was around because he wanted the pill, he wanted to chase , moved around , worked off Plugger made things happen even with a bung knee.
The reason why Davo spends more time on the woodwork than the other 2 guys is simple. Barry and Micky O work all day , where Nick is more of a impact player and the other 2 demand better defenders and Davos opponents generally rebound off him .
Nick Davis : My Only Whipping Boy !!Est 1874
SMFC
09.18.33.2005Comment
-
We need to be quicker and cleaner round the packs and have much more precise delivery to moving forward targets rather than static ones. QED.
The ball was far too easily cleared form our forward line in 2007.Comment
Comment