Even if your observation is limited just to WC (which was ambiguous), I think your observation is debatable. Most of those players aren't comparable in experience levels to the youngsters the OP of this thread was celebrating. And the major reason they have had far more opportunities than their closest equivalents on our list - the likes of Moore and Schmidt - is that West Coast's depth in 25-28 year olds was nothing like as good as Sydney's. They had no choice but to play those players early.
In terms of the players better comparable to Jack, Barlow and Bird in terms of experience:
McKinley's been very good but it's a bit rich to say he's achieved far greater success than Jack. Their efforts have been pretty comparable playing very different roles for their teams.
Kennedy's achieved absolutely nothing yet - he's not even played an AFL game yet.
Brown played a few good games last year but currently isn't in a position to make any contribution. Nor is Le Cras.
And yes, you could have thrown Masten, Selwood or Ebert in there. All look like players with promise. But none has achieved anything more than our equivalents.
In terms of the players better comparable to Jack, Barlow and Bird in terms of experience:
McKinley's been very good but it's a bit rich to say he's achieved far greater success than Jack. Their efforts have been pretty comparable playing very different roles for their teams.
Kennedy's achieved absolutely nothing yet - he's not even played an AFL game yet.
Brown played a few good games last year but currently isn't in a position to make any contribution. Nor is Le Cras.
And yes, you could have thrown Masten, Selwood or Ebert in there. All look like players with promise. But none has achieved anything more than our equivalents.

Comment