If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
When I read the article I simply took it as Tadhg stating that he and Andrew play a similar role, which I certainly believe they do, and he is taking the opportunity to learn from him.
That's exactly how I read it. It was just in the way of expressing it.
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
That's exactly how I read it. It was just in the way of expressing it.
I assumed you probably had, to be honest I saw nothing wrong with his comments or with most of the comments by folks in the thread because it looked like gentle ribbing.
Well actually one thing did puzzle me, does Tadhg really play a similar role to Andrew? Andrew is the guy that, if not invented, certainly perfected the modern half back flanker role of "quarterback"- I was under the impression that Paul Bevan did that at Sydney?
I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time
I assumed you probably had, to be honest I saw nothing wrong with his comments or with most of the comments by folks in the thread because it looked like gentle ribbing.
Well actually one thing did puzzle me, does Tadhg really play a similar role to Andrew? Andrew is the guy that, if not invented, certainly perfected the modern half back flanker role of "quarterback"- I was under the impression that Paul Bevan did that at Sydney?
Bevan is that man, and Kennelly only takes over on those odd occasions when Bevo isn't driving us forward...
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
What a pissweak thread. Saying a player is similar to another player doesn't mean they are as good as each other. Guess what? When I played rugby union, I used to play a similar role to what Jonah Lomu did. Does that mean I was as good as Jonah Lomu? @@@@ no. But I was a big, quick (for the level I was playing at) winger. When I played cricket, I played a similar role to Nathan Bracken. I was a pace bowler that wasn't very quick, but swung the ball well, and was accurate, and I could go for a tonk in the tail. But I wasn't as good as Bracken. I just had a similar role. Well, it's the same as Kennelly. All he said was he was a similar type of player to McLeod. He doesn't insinuate in any way that he is as good as McLeod.
What a pissweak thread. Saying a player is similar to another player doesn't mean they are as good as each other. Guess what? When I played rugby union, I used to play a similar role to what Jonah Lomu did.
Would you have said Lomu played a similar role to you?
When I played cricket, I played a similar role to Nathan Bracken.
Would you have said Bracken played a similar role to you?
So I'm just clarifying what I was referring to earlier - ie: the order in which people say the names - exactly as BSA5 did above.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
Would you have said Lomu played a similar role to you?
Would you have said Bracken played a similar role to you?
So I'm just clarifying what I was referring to earlier - ie: the order in which people say the names - exactly as BSA5 did above.
Yeah, I would have, if it had been appropriate. Say somebody I knew had never seen a game of rugby and watched me play. Then later, I was trying to explain how Jonah Lomu played. I would say "You saw how I was playing, right? Well, Lomu plays a similar role to me." Now that isn't a common scenario, because Lomu is more well known than me (but only a little! :P). It's nothing to do with who is better. It's to do with who is the subject, and who is the basis for comparison, and that depends on context.
Who'd have thunk that semantics would be more important than football in a thread on RWO
For what it is worth I think Nick is just chuckling at the structure of the comments and doesn't really frown at all on Tadhg... and I think that finding well natured humour in that is admirable, verging on adorable.
I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
Who'd have thunk that semantics would be more important than football in a thread on RWO
For what it is worth I think Nick is just chuckling at the structure of the comments and doesn't really frown at all on Tadhg... and I think that finding well natured humour in that is admirable, verging on adorable.
And I am a pedant. I know, bad habit, but I argue. Semantics is one of my favourite topics!
Wow! Posted it a few days ago and haven't been back since. Didn't quite expect the level of anger. I did think the made my intention to be lighthearted clear.
Yes they play similar roles, yes Tadgh's comments showed deference and respect to Macleod, but for my "clownlike" behaviour I apologise unreservedly.
I will now stick to only contributing serious material to the "Nick davis is the best player ever/ is a complete hack." Threads.
Saw that too, and guessed it would be mere hours for some clown to take it out of context and triviliase one of our great players. You came through for me, Dread.
I don't see much of McCleod so I can't compare the two, but it's pretty obvious Tadhg was talking in terms of style, not talent.
Comment