Teams v Carlton

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • satchmopugdog
    Bandicoots ears
    • Apr 2004
    • 3691

    #16
    I like Sergio...his barrel chest just does something for me
    "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

    Comment

    • 573v30
      On the bandwagon...
      • Sep 2005
      • 5017

      #17
      Great to see Thornton make his debut.
      I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

      Comment

      • dimelb
        pr. dim-melb; m not f
        • Jun 2003
        • 6889

        #18
        Originally posted by satchmopugdog
        I like Sergio...his barrel chest just does something for me
        I think his surname might be pronounced in the Spanish way: "Viyagra".
        He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

        Comment

        • SimonH
          Salt future's rising
          • Aug 2004
          • 1647

          #19
          Originally posted by BSA5
          Also, does anybody else think it's odd that Ablett is an emergency? Surely if he was injured, he wouldn't be named at all? And if he isn't injured, then he must simply be dropped, and based on past comments by Roos (such as "our midfield just doesn't work without him"), that seems unlikely.
          Yes, I do. His inclusion in the leadership group (which is synonymous with an 'automatic inclusion if fit' group, up to this point) only accentuates the oddness.

          While it's probably of mere theoretical interest, good to see Grundy named at CHF and Ted at CHB, where for the last couple of weeks it's been the other way around.

          Comment

          • annew
            Senior Player
            • Mar 2006
            • 2164

            #20
            That is 13 players named that were not in the Premiership team and they say we haven't changed our team much!

            Comment

            • goswannie14
              Leadership Group
              • Sep 2005
              • 11166

              #21
              Originally posted by annew
              That is 13 players named that were not in the Premiership team and they say we haven't changed our team much!
              We haven't, given this is the forth season since the premiership, it is a verrrrrry slow change of personnel.
              Does God believe in Atheists?

              Comment

              • satchmopugdog
                Bandicoots ears
                • Apr 2004
                • 3691

                #22
                Originally posted by dimelb
                I think his surname might be pronounced in the Spanish way: "Viyagra".
                Like your work.
                "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

                Comment

                • annew
                  Senior Player
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 2164

                  #23
                  Originally posted by goswannie14
                  We haven't, given this is the forth season since the premiership, it is a verrrrrry slow change of personnel.
                  Maybe so but it is only 2 full years since we lost a GF by 1 point.

                  Comment

                  • Kanga
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 274

                    #24
                    If Hall doesn't play who will be the major goal kickers for you guys?

                    Carlton have Fev to take care of their goal efforts......

                    Will be a cracker match at the SCG - no one (even me) could accuse the Swans of not having a go at their home ground.

                    Comment

                    • Gary
                      Regular in the Side
                      • Sep 2005
                      • 608

                      #25
                      Barlow?

                      Sometimes I can admit mistakes e.g. Ted Richards has now done enough to be at least rated a reasonable pick up...& Bevan has recovered his career...but after early promise...is it not obvious to everyone...including the selection panel...that Barlow just hasn't got it?
                      The guy makes trouble out anything...no peripheral vision...no football brain...he only looks half decent if he is a long way from anyone & can run...even then he is still likely to run into trouble or dispose of the ball poorly.
                      I thought Goodes decision making early (i.e. until I turned off) was woeful for a player of his stature. That certainly doesn't help a Barlow to start thinking.
                      All that silly hand passing in a crowd while the rain poured down...do they get any instructions?
                      On selection I still say that any team that can carry both LRT & Grundy on a regular basis has a serious problem.
                      Buchanan has been on the slide for a couple of years...sad to watch...is he carrying some sort of injury?

                      Comment

                      • Mr Magoo
                        Senior Player
                        • May 2008
                        • 1255

                        #26
                        Originally posted by annew
                        Maybe so but it is only 2 full years since we lost a GF by 1 point.
                        Thought it was interesting that Brian taylor said that Richmonds decision to cut a lot of its premiership group in one go just a year or so after winning it in the early 80s was the start of Richmonds culture problems which he believed has permeated through even to this day.

                        He believed that the result of doing this was a selfish culture in which everyone looked out for themselves and the large cut of premiership players left no one to carry on the good culture that had developed during the premiership years. Interesting comment from a person who was on the inside at the time

                        Comment

                        • Midfield
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Apr 2009
                          • 196

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Gary
                          Sometimes I can admit mistakes e.g. Ted Richards has now done enough to be at least rated a reasonable pick up...& Bevan has recovered his career...but after early promise...is it not obvious to everyone...including the selection panel...that Barlow just hasn't got it?
                          The guy makes trouble out anything...no peripheral vision...no football brain...he only looks half decent if he is a long way from anyone & can run...even then he is still likely to run into trouble or dispose of the ball poorly.
                          I thought Goodes decision making early (i.e. until I turned off) was woeful for a player of his stature. That certainly doesn't help a Barlow to start thinking.
                          All that silly hand passing in a crowd while the rain poured down...do they get any instructions?
                          On selection I still say that any team that can carry both LRT & Grundy on a regular basis has a serious problem.
                          Buchanan has been on the slide for a couple of years...sad to watch...is he carrying some sort of injury?
                          Amon did his calf in the ressies a couple of weeks back but should have never been dropped. Without a doubt the most underrated player in the team. We are a poorer team without him.

                          Comment

                          • Mike_B
                            Peyow Peyow
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 6267

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Midfield
                            Amon did his calf in the ressies a couple of weeks back but should have never been dropped. Without a doubt the most underrated player in the team. We are a poorer team without him.
                            Yes, I agree that we are a poorer team without him at his best. The way he played in 2005 he was crucial to our performance. I don't know what it is - attitude, injuries or just a change in the way the game is played now compared to 2005, but the 2007-8 version of Amon was a far cry from that and deserved to be dropped. As far as being underrated, well, after 2 years of performing poorly, you have to start questioning whether he is underrated or just underperforming.

                            I'm on the Chandwagon!!!

                            If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.

                            Comment

                            • 10Totti10
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Apr 2009
                              • 443

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Midfield
                              Amon did his calf in the ressies a couple of weeks back but should have never been dropped. Without a doubt the most underrated player in the team. We are a poorer team without him.
                              I disagree. Amon does give it his all, and runs his guts out BUT his distribution of the ball is shocking. Can't kick a goal from a simple set shot (just as bad if not worse than Playfair). Inconsistent and gives away to many free kicks.
                              He was right to be dropped but to b honest I'd rather have him than Barlow at the moment.
                              Also he is not underrated. Sometimes I wish he left instead of Schnieder.

                              Comment

                              • Mr Magoo
                                Senior Player
                                • May 2008
                                • 1255

                                #30
                                Amon would only be underrated if he was as fit and firing as he was in 2005. He had the ability to really influence games at that time but for whatever reason (it seems to be alluded to that he has had a lot of underlying injury problems) he is almost a bit part player these days.

                                Amon in 2009 is overrated if anything and in his current form is not worth perservering with over giving a younger guy the opportunity to learn in the midfield while we still have Kirk and Bolton to support them.

                                Comment

                                Working...