Teams: Sydney v Collingwood

[ugg]

That would require some agile, quick-thinking crumbing small-ish forwards. The Magpies have Davis, Thomas, Didak, Dick and Lockyer. We have Moore, who isn't the best crumber, and maybe Bevan if they shift him up there...

[Xie Shan]

the article also forgot to mention that while we were a 'better' team than Collingwood in '05 / '06, that hasn't been the case since then.

[connolly]

I think a few of us would agree with this. Glenn Archer on how the Swans can beat their Pies hoodoo:





Magpie style casts a spell on the Swans - AFL.com.au

We can take if from that flash of brilliance that Archer isn't a candidate for the Kangas job.

[dimelb]

Can't agree. No-one is as bad as Neville as imposing themselves on the game unnecessarily and in guessing what happened rather than relying on what they actually saw.

With the newfangled attention to the umpies in mind, can some enterprising citizen put up a banner saying "Go Chamberpot" or some such?

[connolly]

Can't agree. No-one is as bad as Neville as imposing themselves on the game unnecessarily and in guessing what happened rather than relying on what they actually saw.

He is a serial pest. And it should come as no surprise that he is a "finance broker". Which makes him doubly useless.

[connolly]

I knew you'd find a way to turn Jeffers' comment into a positive

The Bevantor will revel in the heavy going. Its going to be a slog tonight. Not a night for mug lairs with bleached bonces.

[ShockOfHair]

I liked Archer's points about doing something unexpected to beat a jinx. If the Swans won contested ball, that'd catch everyone off-guard.

[shaun..]

We can take if from that flash of brilliance that Archer isn't a candidate for the Kangas job.

Nope that 'flash of brilliance' is just helping with the process..