Umpiring to watch off the ball NOW BBB has gone!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kanga
    On the Rookie List
    • Aug 2007
    • 274

    #16
    Originally posted by goswannie14
    They are probably spending more time wondering about the value of the money they pump into North Melbourne only for them to continually flounder.
    And how much would that be exactly?

    Continually flounder? Premierships in 75 77 96 & 99. Hmmmm....

    Comment

    • Kanga
      On the Rookie List
      • Aug 2007
      • 274

      #17
      Originally posted by Bloody Hell
      A. The Swans won't bottom out - they haven't even missed the 8 yet.

      B. Ask Eddie. Since he changed his tune seems the rest of the footballing world has followed suit...except you of course.

      And Eddie gives the AFL advice that they listen to? Is the addition $800k funding spread across the playing group? Or just used to buy a name player??


      Good luck against the Tigers by the way - not sure the Swans play the G that well so will be interesting game.

      Comment

      • Industrial Fan
        Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
        • Aug 2006
        • 3317

        #18
        Originally posted by Kanga
        The AFL can:
        A. Listen to Roos' whingeing about not being able to bottom out?
        B. Wonder how much value there is in the extra $800k the Swans get in their salary cap.
        To pose another question, which is the bigger problem:

        A. Your team cant afford a box of special K
        B. Your team does not have enough fans to finish a box of special K

        So many dilemmas.
        He ate more cheese, than time allowed

        Comment

        • Industrial Fan
          Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
          • Aug 2006
          • 3317

          #19
          Oh and at least we know Barry will be well looked after at the dogs.

          Maybe Barry will take part in the next moon landing?
          He ate more cheese, than time allowed

          Comment

          • laughingnome
            Amateur Statsman
            • Jul 2006
            • 1624

            #20
            Originally posted by Industrial Fan
            To pose another question, which is the bigger problem:

            A. Your team cant afford a box of special K
            B. Your team does not have enough fans to finish a box of special K

            So many dilemmas.
            Ouch, Very ouch.
            10100111001 ;-)

            Comment

            • DeadlyAkkuret
              Veterans List
              • Oct 2006
              • 4547

              #21
              Originally posted by Puppy Eyes
              Hi Kanga, welcome to our forum. Question. Do you know why the Swans get extra money in their salary cap?
              Originally posted by Kanga
              And Eddie gives the AFL advice that they listen to? Is the addition $800k funding spread across the playing group? Or just used to buy a name player??
              In other words you're a troll who has no clue.

              Originally posted by Kanga
              Good luck against the Tigers by the way - not sure the Swans play the G that well so will be interesting game.
              Good luck surviving, not that I mean it.

              Comment

              • Trickster
                On the Rookie List
                • Jul 2009
                • 377

                #22
                Originally posted by Industrial Fan
                Oh and at least we know Barry will be well looked after at the dogs.

                Maybe Barry will take part in the next moon landing?
                Barry and Aker in the same team-either a power combo or a feud waiting to happen!

                Comment

                • Kanga
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 274

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Industrial Fan
                  To pose another question, which is the bigger problem:

                  A. Your team cant afford a box of special K
                  B. Your team does not have enough fans to finish a box of special K

                  So many dilemmas.
                  Have a look at the membership figures for both clubs and come back to me then IF.

                  Comment

                  • Kanga
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 274

                    #24
                    [QUOTE=DeadlyAkkuret;452194]In other words you're a troll who has no clue.


                    Enlighten me if you are up to it DA!!

                    Comment

                    • Margo
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 138

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Kanga
                      :


                      Good luck against the Tigers by the way - not sure the Swans play the G that well so will be interesting game.

                      What a nasty little peanut you are !!

                      Why would you spend time on RWO ? Wouldn't you rather talk about "your" team among like peanuts ?

                      Our team doesn't need your brand of "good luck" thank you very much.

                      Comment

                      • Kanga
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Aug 2007
                        • 274

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Margo
                        What a nasty little peanut you are !!

                        Why would you spend time on RWO ? Wouldn't you rather talk about "your" team among like peanuts ?

                        Our team doesn't need your brand of "good luck" thank you very much.
                        I have noted your join date Margo. Not too sure that you are in a position to really comment on who and when is on RWO....? Alternatively just ignore my posts! (I can live without your responses!!)

                        If you think that I am overly negative feel free to review/search my previous posts.
                        Last edited by Kanga; 6 August 2009, 12:19 PM. Reason: Spelling correction

                        Comment

                        • Cardinal
                          Regular in the Side
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 932

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Margo
                          What a nasty little peanut you are !!

                          Why would you spend time on RWO ? Wouldn't you rather talk about "your" team among like peanuts ?

                          Our team doesn't need your brand of "good luck" thank you very much.
                          For what it's worth I actually find it really interesting to see what fans of other clubs have to say. It's why I like to read the other bulletin boards. There's a lot of same same but different persepctives to be found.

                          Also confirms that it's only the most biased of other club supporters who think the Swans aren't the most harshly penalised team in the comp.

                          Comment

                          • Margo
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Jul 2009
                            • 138

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Kanga
                            I have noted your join date Margo. Not too sure that you are in a position to really comment on who and when is on RWO....? Alternatively just ignore my posts! (I can live without your responses!!)

                            If you think that I am overly negative feel free to review/search my previous posts.
                            I don't need to explain anything to you, but I can say that I have been reading these posts for 3 years. Not that that has anything to do with my opinion of what you are banging on about today, (and many, many times in the past),What I said to someone on a different matter 6 years ago, I am pretty sure, would not alter what you think of what I have said today. But then again, maybe it would.
                            Also, I don't need your advice/permission on what I can comment on.
                            You can roll your eyes again now when I say, Get over the extra $ paid to the Swans !! Harping on about the same thing makes you seem very old and admitting to confusion doesn't help.

                            Comment

                            • Kanga
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Aug 2007
                              • 274

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Margo
                              I don't need to explain anything to you, but I can say that I have been reading these posts for 3 years. Congrats!
                              Not that that has anything to do with my opinion of what you are banging on about today, (and many, many times in the past),What I said to someone on a different matter 6 years ago, I am pretty sure, would not alter what you think of what I have said today. Re-read the posts first before you comment....
                              But then again, maybe it would.

                              Also, I don't need your advice/permission on what I can comment on. That was my entire point!
                              You can roll your eyes again now when I say, Get over the extra $ paid to the Swans !! Is that the best you can do? Can't justify the extra $$?
                              Harping on about the same thing makes you seem very old (its a forum - lots of people here harp on....)and admitting to confusion doesn't help. Confusion as to your comments not mine!!
                              Didn't think you would bother reviewing my previous posts on other topics..


                              Dare I say it Good Luck on the weekend!

                              Comment

                              • Melbournehammer
                                Senior Player
                                • May 2007
                                • 1815

                                #30
                                I actually don't mind Kanga - knows his footy, supports his team, but doesn't dislike the swans (overly much) and often has a useful point or two (for example rightly said that us beating them wasn't exactly all that impressive given their recent form)

                                Comment

                                Working...