Trading talk thread

[ugg]

More Twitter scuttlebutt

http://twitter.com/SENNEWS

Rumours suggest the Cats might give Mumford and Wojcinski to Sydney ... negotiations continuing between two clubs.

[wearebloods]

The latest rumour is the Woszinski may be part of the Mumford deal. That either means pick 28 (surely not 14!) or a Swans player going in the other direction. The Swans player would have to play for peanuts to fit under their cap.

Perhaps a later draft choice + Playfair would suffice.

[hammo]

Perhaps a later draft choice + Playfair would suffice.

Playfair will be joining Nathan Brown and Russell Robertson in the pre season draft.

[CJK]

Perhaps a later draft choice + Playfair would suffice.

Brilliant

[UglyDuckling]

The latest rumour is the Woszinski may be part of the Mumford deal. That either means pick 28 (surely not 14!) or a Swans player going in the other direction. The Swans player would have to play for peanuts to fit under their cap.

Surely not 28 Geelong have to unload wojak who is 29 in order to give them some salary cap space so he doesnt add greatly to the value of the deal and Mumford isnt worth 28 he is a rookie with 20 games. 38 i think would be a fair deal maybe throw in 54. That would be 38 for the mummy and 54 for wojak.

[robamiee]

More Twitter scuttlebutt

http://twitter.com/SENNEWS

it would ahve to be pick 28 and a player..To get Woj as part of the deal...awesome finally some pace

though i like your reasoning UGG

[caj23]

More Twitter scuttlebutt

http://twitter.com/SENNEWS

Wojo is 29. If we trade pick 14 for him and Mumford I will smash my PC screen

[reigning premier]

I really don't think we need Mcglynn if it's going to cost us a package deal with Kennedy for Pick 14. It's obvious that is what Pelchin will be after.

Also if we traded 28 for Mumford which i hope we don't (pick 38 will do considering he's out of contract), it would severly hamper our chances to get Kennedy.

I'd give up pick 14 & 48 for both McGlynn & Kennedy. 38 looks to be the deal for Mumford leaving us with pick 6, 28, Seaby, Mumford, McGlynn, Kennedy.

[Cardinal]

Surely not 28 Geelong have to unload wojak who is 29 in order to give them some salary cap space so he doesnt add greatly to the value of the deal and Mumford isnt worth 28 he is a rookie with 20 games. 38 i think would be a fair deal maybe throw in 54. That would be 38 for the mummy and 54 for wojak.

Agreed, although I think Geelong will push for a straight up pick 28

[reigning premier]

it would ahve to be pick 28 and a player..To get Woj as part of the deal...awesome finally some pace

though i like your reasoning UGG

Wojo is 29. If we trade pick 14 for him and Mumford I will smash my PC screen

We don't want him at all...... Might be quick and all but turning 29. It's just not worth our while.

[DST]

A quick recap for all.

At this point Swans have:

Traded out;

Buchanan, Jolly, Hall

Traded In;

Seaby,

Our remaining picks are;

6, 14, 28, 39, 47

Strong possible pick ups are;

Mumford, Kennedy.

Rumoured pick up;

McGlynn.

Don't we have 38 as well?

DST

[hammo]

I'd give up pick 14 & 48 for both McGlynn & Kennedy. 38 looks to be the deal for Mumford leaving us with pick 6, 28, Seaby, Mumford, McGlynn, Kennedy.

14 should be off limits now unless someone of real quality becomes available. Kennedy and McGlynn do not fit into that category.

[Plugger46]

Don't we have 38 as well?

DST

Yeah but not 47 I think?

[DeadlyAkkuret]

Why couldn't we have pushed for Collingwood's pick 30? It should have been Jolly and pick 38 to Collingwood, pick 14 and 30 to Sydney.

Anyone suggesting we trade pick 14 in a deal to get Kennedy or McGlynn is crazy. Pick 39 for Kennedy and pick 28 (If we have to) for Mumford should be what we're aiming for.

[Donners]

Yeah but not 47 I think?

Right, we traded 47 to Brisbane.

The confusing thing is that we're still going to be swapping picks with Bulldogs at the end of the draft.