Trading talk thread

[liz]

That is exact;y why we should be demanding their 2nd round pick. Their 3rd rounder is worth zilch

Depending on how many picks we expect to us, swapping their 2nd round for our 3rd round might be a reasonable deal. They lose around 8 spots; we gain them.

[ugg]

I think this is how it works out from our point of view
Seaby + 39 -> 22
39 + Buchanan -> 28

Sydney
In: Seaby and 28
Out: Buchanan and 22
West Coast
In: Dalziell and 22
Out: Staker, Seaby and 39
Brisbane
In: Buchanan, Staker and 39
Out: Dalziell and 28

[Reggi]

As for Collingwood and Jolly, I'd love to see them let Jolly slip through their hands just like Plugger did

Heh Heh hopefully Josh Fraser's dad is on the board

[Ludwig]

I think this is how it works out from our point of view
Seaby + 39 -> 22
39 + Buchanan -> 28

Sydney
In: Seaby and 28
Out: Buchanan and 22
West Coast
In: Dalziell and 22
Out: Staker, Seaby and 39
Brisbane
In: Buchanan, Staker and 39
Out: Dalziell and 28

Looks like a pretty good deal for all parties concerned. I think pick 39 is ours. The way a deal should be. Out of favour players go to new clubs and not much difference in the pick swaps. From our standpoint, picks 28 and 39 may be better than just 22. I'd definitely swap Buchanon for Seaby. Rucks are always more valuable. If Jolly goes, Seaby will be crucial.

[Tuhob]

Details of the Seaby trade

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/85739/default.aspx

so we got pick 39 as well???

I think if you actually analyse what they've said in the report, Brisbane receive pick 39 (39 -> Sydney -> Brisbane)

EDIT: Or what ugg has posted

[Ludwig]

I think if you actually analyse what they've said in the report, Brisbane receive pick 39 (39 -> Sydney -> Brisbane)

EDIT: Or what ugg has posted

I think pick 39 is ours. Pick 39 was originally Brisbane's. Doesn't make sense that they would get it back. Why bother mentioning it. I think UGG misspoke.

[i'm-uninformed2]

I think pick 39 is ours. Pick 39 was originally Brisbane's. Doesn't make sense that they would get it back. Why bother mentioning it. I think UGG misspoke.

Yep - 39 was swapped for Seaby and 22 after Brisbane sent 39 to WCE.

[hammo]

If Brisbane get 39 as well then they're laughing all the way to the bank.

[liz]

39 was originally West Coast's, not Brisbane's.

[The Big Cat]

Yep - 39 was swapped for Seaby and 22 after Brisbane sent 39 to WCE.

39 comes to us with Seaby in return for 22. (Not too bad given that we acquired 28 for Bucky) Thus Seaby cost us Bucky and six places in the draft

[caj23]

WTF didn't we hand over 28 instead of 22???

If we're lucky enough to screw the Lions over on the trade we shouldnt have pandered to the Eagles demands for pick 22

Seems like most of our trades are lopsided against us

[i'm-uninformed2]

39 was originally West Coast's, not Brisbane's.

Oops, sorry - well, we ended up with it anyway.

[ugg]

WTF didn't we hand over 28 instead of 22???

If we're lucky enough to screw the Lions over on the trade we shouldnt have pandered to the Eagles demands for pick 22

Seems like most of our trades are lopsided against us

the swans could have held out for those six places but is it really worth it. Seems the recruiting team already has its hands full with the Jolly and Hall deals so they probably wanted this one to clear

[10Totti10]

Dogs say third round pick too much for Hall - AFL.com.au

Pick 47 for Hall basically

[ugg]

Dogs say third round pick too much for Hall - AFL.com.au

Pick 47 for Hall basically

not according to that link. 47 is apparently too expensive for them