-
"be tough, only when it gets tough"
-
Do we really have "extra spots" on the list. I think at the moment there are 5 spots, of which one is earmarked for Bradshaw. If Kennelly returns he takes one (my starting numbers are on the basis he is gone); if Playfair retires he frees up a spot. Nominating outside vets could increase it by up to two, but rookie elevations would decrease it - these two factors could easily net each other off.
So as things stand, it is entirely conceivable that the club could take as few as 3 youngsters in the draft as it is.Comment
-
Well I'm like everyone else and hope that Playfair is able to kick on but he may go as well.Comment
-
-
Swans apparently have shown interest in the U18's championships best player medalist Andrew hooper...
His height though may be an issue, but seems a good player..
Rebel pushes his cause - AFL.com.auComment
-
i think i would prefer hooper in the middle myself, but haven't seen enough nick smith to say other wiseComment
-
Crouch was (still is!) only 173cm tall and he managed to carve himself a pretty respectable career.
How quick is Hooper? A combination of lack of lightning speed and short stature might count against him.Comment
-
Smith has proven to be a ball magnet in his couple of seasons in the 2's. Trust me, he is just learning the ropes and waiting for his slight frame to bulk up a bit before he moves into that role in the seniors.
He won't spend the rest of his career minding the likes of Eddie Betts and Steven Milne as he did towards the end of 2009, he has way too much natural ball getting instinct to be wasted there in the long term.Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09Comment
-
He's pretty quick: 2.90 over 20m at Draft Camp (3rd), and 7.98 in the agility test (2nd). He's also got a good standing vertical leap, coming in at 3rd with 70, somewhat cancelling out his height deficiency.
He didn't rank in the top 10 for repeat sprints though, suggesting fitness is quite a problem. Hopefully nothing a good couple of preseasons in a professional environment can't remedy though.Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!Comment
-
Hooper would be okay with me. Small forwards seem to be a problem for us and Hooper would give us a direct option.
Smith would be wasted in maintaining that role. Midfield for Smitty.
I'm still torn between Lucas and Rohan and i'm hoping Talia gets to us at 14.Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.
Comment
-
Just spent half an hour watching those vidoes. What a great site.
I would be happy with any of Cunnington, Rohan, Talia or Hooper, although have no idea what our draft strategy is - they all seem quite accomplished. Didn't have time to view others, so just focused on these palyers.
Cunnington, that guy has glue on his hands. Would be difficult to match up on as is slightly taller as a midfielder, but would outmark a lot of taggers. Also seems to have good evasive skills and racks up the numbers.
Rohan - no doubt he is very fast and has some great evasive skills. Even though he did well at the draft camp on the new kick test, I reckon he is a bit of a kick and pray sort of guy from what I saw. Not sold, based on what I saw (but hey, just video grabs, I'll leave it to the pundits). We need speed.
Talia - Hadn't really seen him before, but has CHB in the style of Jakovich written all over him. Seems to be quite mobile for a guy 194cm and a lot of his highlights reel was actually in the midfield. This guy would be perfect for us I reckon - would potentially complete a spine of White, Johnston, Talia.
Hooper - So many cliches apply, nuggety, chunk etc. etc. Someone has to replace Buchanen and Courch, surely, or our average height will get dangerously...precipitous, particualry with all our new ruckmen. He's such an old fashioned looking footy player, how could you not love Hooper. I reckon Bevo would be up against it if we drafted Hooper. Looks more of a back than forward to me, but I guess that's just where he has been playing U18 footy.He had observed that people who did lie were, on the whole, more resourceful and ambitious and successful than people who did not lie.Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 04:18 AM.
Comment