Jolly not in AA list

[Captain]

O'Keefe was quite unlucky, though.

Think his poor start to the season hurt him. IIRC lots of the AA selectors were speaking at the time how he didn't look 'happy'.

[Plugger46]

Think his poor start to the season hurt him. IIRC lots of the AA selectors were speaking at the time how he didn't look 'happy'.

Yeah, it wasn't long though. Improved against Carlton (R4) and was very consistent thereafter.

[Bleed Red Blood]

Jolls can feel ripped off - as can Rhys Shaw who made more forward progress for his team than anyone else in the competition.

Please, Shaw's a long way off that squad.

[Plugger46]

Please, Shaw's a long way off that squad.

Agreed but so is Andrew Mackie. Can't believe how highly rated he is. Good player but that's it. Ironically, he played his best game of the year against us.

[Lohengrin]

Sandilands and Clark have been very good this year, so Jolly should be in third or fourth place. McIntosh has been pretty good. The three above Jolly tend to do more around the ground.

O'Keefe probably unlucky, but I'm not sure who you'd drop out from my quick glance down the list.

[giant]

Would have had Jolly ahead of McIntosh - but it's probably Sandilands and Clark for the final 22 anyway. Clark's effort on Saturday was outstanding - he looks like a superstar in the making.

[Lohengrin]

Agreed but so is Andrew Mackie. Can't believe how highly rated he is. Good player but that's it. Ironically, he played his best game of the year against us.

Everyone else rates him. Lyon specifically brought in a player to tag him in the GF.

[Darren Thomson]

No Jolly = Disgrace

Agree, carried the ruck pretty much single handed and set records all year, kicked goals, made tackles took marks etc etc etc, what does a bloke have to do to get an AA nom? I won't go into the obvious