Schneider & Dempster in the GF....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • reigning premier
    Suspended by the MRP
    • Sep 2006
    • 4335

    Schneider & Dempster in the GF....

    Saw a few comments on another thread re these two so rather than de-railing that one, and considering it's as close as we got to the GF this year , thought it worthy of a discussion.

    Didn't see much of Dempster but Thought Schneider played OK. Didn't deserve the pasting some have given him. He was the Saints leading goal scorer and kicked 2.3. Had he kicked 4.1, he would of won the Norm Smith (And I had $5 on him too).
  • SwansFan1972
    On the Rookie List
    • Nov 2008
    • 621

    #2
    Yep - he went ok - but as we all know, Grand Finals require a bit more than ok.

    Same flaws as when he was with us - butchers opportunities that should be converted. Still kicks with his tongue out (maybe should try keeping it in)!

    Still sad for him and all the Saints though - had it in the bag and let it slip.

    Comment

    • AnnieH
      RWOs Black Sheep
      • Aug 2006
      • 11332

      #3
      Speaking of past players ... did anyone watch the VFL granny on Friday night?

      Saddo is still getting in trouble every time the ball comes near him.
      Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
      Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

      Comment

      • Hartijon
        On the Rookie List
        • May 2008
        • 1536

        #4
        Originally posted by SwansFan1972
        Yep - he went ok - but as we all know, Grand Finals require a bit more than ok.

        Same flaws as when he was with us - butchers opportunities that should be converted. Still kicks with his tongue out (maybe should try keeping it in)!

        Still sad for him and all the Saints though - had it in the bag and let it slip.
        Yeah,that says it all! against Geelong ok is not good enough,neither is typical
        missed chances. I really thought with the weather it was Milne's and Schneider's day.It wasn't,Schneider played ok, Milne was terrible. Dempster,well he had the rare chance to almost seal the game in the last quarter and never looked like doing it,was slow and I can see why we let him go. Rather have Shaw and Mal or Mattner on our half back line any day.

        Comment

        • Cardinal
          Regular in the Side
          • Sep 2008
          • 932

          #5
          Originally posted by reigning premier
          Saw a few comments on another thread re these two so rather than de-railing that one, and considering it's as close as we got to the GF this year , thought it worthy of a discussion.

          Didn't see much of Dempster but Thought Schneider played OK. Didn't deserve the pasting some have given him. He was the Saints leading goal scorer and kicked 2.3. Had he kicked 4.1, he would of won the Norm Smith (And I had $5 on him too).
          Yep - cost me my $2 at 101 as well

          Comment

          • 573v30
            On the bandwagon...
            • Sep 2005
            • 5017

            #6
            I was glad to see Schneider kick a couple of goals on the big occasion but at the same time very disappointed to see him blatantly dive for free kicks inside the forward 50. Leave that to the filthy rodent (Milne).
            I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

            Comment

            • hammo
              Veterans List
              • Jul 2003
              • 5554

              #7
              St Kilda lost the game because they blew their chances inside 50 and Schneider was the chief offender. His 3 behinds were all howlers, his second goal simply because he was in the right place at the right time a dodgy free kick was given.

              He did all the hard work in the last quarter to get inside his man, get onto his left and kick from about 45 but it never went close.
              "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

              Comment

              • Cardinal
                Regular in the Side
                • Sep 2008
                • 932

                #8
                Originally posted by 573v30
                I was glad to see Schneider kick a couple of goals on the big occasion but at the same time very disappointed to see him blatantly dive for free kicks inside the forward 50. Leave that to the filthy rodent (Milne).
                Originally posted by hammo
                St Kilda lost the game because they blew their chances inside 50 and Schneider was the chief offender. His 3 behinds were all howlers, his second goal simply because he was in the right place at the right time a dodgy free kick was given.

                He did all the hard work in the last quarter to get inside his man, get onto his left and kick from about 45 but it never went close.
                And didn't his playing for frees cost him in the end. Mind you the entire Hawthorn team and Selwood seem to have done ok from their acting. Don't think Milne will be so lucky though.

                Comment

                • Lohengrin
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 641

                  #9
                  Schneider had a deadset shocker. Missed 2 gimmes and 1 gettable goal. Cost the Saints the flag with his poor efforts. With that much experience in GFs he should have done a lot better, but missing the easy shots is what we were used to with him.

                  He kicked one real goal (the second doesn't count for assessing his perfomance) - 1.3 for the day was wasteful.

                  Dempster was ineffective.

                  Comment

                  • lachlanc
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 92

                    #10
                    Also think Schneider had a shocker, and I could see why we traded him, for all his liveliness this year. When he really has to do it, like kick a goal in the Grand Final, you can't rely on him. It was same when he wore red and white - you just couldn't be confident he would nail the big goals. His scoreline of two goals flattered him - one was a free kick at point blank range.

                    Best thing you could say is that he was infinitely better than Milne.
                    lachlanc

                    Comment

                    • Melbournehammer
                      Senior Player
                      • May 2007
                      • 1815

                      #11
                      actually I think most of this thread misses the point. Schneider and Dempster did their job under the lyons game plan - keep the ball in - don't let mackie, harley run off you. Don't let them go third man up too often. And don't let geelong get uncontested possessions. They tackled hard and kept the ball in which was what they were there for.

                      The reality is that neither is an A grade goal sneak - in fact milne is better than both at that by quite some distance.

                      I remain frustrated with schneider because he has a good footy brain but he does have (barring that final quarter v the saints) an unerring ability to miss gettable goals, and a little frustrated with dempster because as father sons go he wasn't scarlett or ablett

                      The thing that stuffed the saints was the weather - st kilda had better big man forwards, geelong better little man forwards. The weather made it a day for little men forwards....and neither schneider nor dempster are in the top echelon for this.

                      I'm happy we traded them (although I still think we traded "light" to a mate rather than what they were worth) but they did their jobs

                      Comment

                      • mcs
                        Travelling Swannie!!
                        • Jul 2007
                        • 8168

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Melbournehammer
                        actually I think most of this thread misses the point. Schneider and Dempster did their job under the lyons game plan - keep the ball in - don't let mackie, harley run off you. Don't let them go third man up too often. And don't let geelong get uncontested possessions. They tackled hard and kept the ball in which was what they were there for.

                        The reality is that neither is an A grade goal sneak - in fact milne is better than both at that by quite some distance.

                        I remain frustrated with schneider because he has a good footy brain but he does have (barring that final quarter v the saints) an unerring ability to miss gettable goals, and a little frustrated with dempster because as father sons go he wasn't scarlett or ablett

                        The thing that stuffed the saints was the weather - st kilda had better big man forwards, geelong better little man forwards. The weather made it a day for little men forwards....and neither schneider nor dempster are in the top echelon for this.

                        I'm happy we traded them (although I still think we traded "light" to a mate rather than what they were worth) but they did their jobs
                        They might have done their job on the day, but surely part of Schneiders job, especially on a wet day at the G is to kick any goals that present themselves. His misses (especially that one from about 10 out) were criminal, and in a low scoring, close tussle, he could very well have made the difference for the Saints. He can do very good things at times, but I'm not convinced about his ability to step it up a gear and put the proverbial foot in when the opponent is on the ropes.

                        As for Dempster, he did ok but that is all he ever does imo. I'm still not unhappy we traded them, apart from what we recieved in return for them in terms of a draft pick, but thats footy.
                        "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                        Comment

                        • satchmopugdog
                          Bandicoots ears
                          • Apr 2004
                          • 3691

                          #13
                          I thought Dempster did some excellent work.. In the pack situations he did some excellent shepherds to free space for others. Nothing flashy but a lot of self sacrificing stuff. I kept saying to my brother"Did you see what Dempster did then..that was so good." Maybe because I was looking for him, but also I look for that stuff..like the stuff Bird does for us that doesn't get noticed.
                          "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

                          Comment

                          • Darren Thomson
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 291

                            #14
                            I'm not certain about iether players game. Under the conditions, and with the number of inside 50's the Saints had,you would have expected them to win by about blot. Geelong's defence is pretty bloody good though, and there isn't a team that has licked a big score on them this year, or the last three years, well, from memory. I think these players were serviceable without being Lenny Hayes, who had a blinding first quarter then trailed off a bit. Saints spent their petrol tickets creating opportunities that were not capitalised on and yes, Schneider may well have a kicked afew more, but show me a team that hasn't struggled to kick goals against Geelong.


                            Paul Roos for PM

                            Comment

                            • mcs
                              Travelling Swannie!!
                              • Jul 2007
                              • 8168

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Darren Thomson
                              I'm not certain about iether players game. Under the conditions, and with the number of inside 50's the Saints had,you would have expected them to win by about blot. Geelong's defence is pretty bloody good though, and there isn't a team that has licked a big score on them this year, or the last three years, well, from memory. I think these players were serviceable without being Lenny Hayes, who had a blinding first quarter then trailed off a bit. Saints spent their petrol tickets creating opportunities that were not capitalised on and yes, Schneider may well have a kicked afew more, but show me a team that hasn't struggled to kick goals against Geelong.
                              All that you say is completely true DT, but at the end of the day Schneider (Along With Milne) missed clear cut opportunities against the Geelong defence. Every team struggles to kick goals against Geelong, but it wasn't the case on Saturday that St Kilda simply didn't have enough chances to win the game. They had plenty of opportunities (Especially considering how good their defence is) to kick enough goals to win, but they wasted several golden chances, and Schneider was one of the worst offenders. It was never going to be about St Kilda kicking 20 goals and flogging Geelong- if St Kilda was going to win it was going to be a close game, and that it was, and St Kilda had their chances, but didn't take them.
                              "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                              Comment

                              Working...