Saints dump Lovett after rape charge

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • COBHC
    On the Rookie List
    • May 2009
    • 78

    Saints dump Lovett after rape charge

    ST KILDA has sacked recruit Andrew Lovett the day after he was officially charged by Victoria Police with one count of rape.

    Club CEO Michael Nettlefold, coach Ross Lyon and vice president Ross Levine announced the decision at Moorabbin on Tuesday.

    Saints dump Lovett after rape charge
  • Industrial Fan
    Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
    • Aug 2006
    • 3317

    #2
    Boy am I glad we didnt land that loose cannon.
    He ate more cheese, than time allowed

    Comment

    • ScottH
      It's Goodes to cheer!!
      • Sep 2003
      • 23665

      #3
      Originally posted by Industrial Fan
      Boy am I glad we didnt land that loose cannon.
      He was a big risk, and the saints took it and lost.

      Be interesting to see what happens if he is accquitted of the charges.

      Comment

      • CureTheSane
        Carpe Noctem
        • Jan 2003
        • 5032

        #4
        Indeed.

        Seeems a bit of guilty until proven innocent to me.

        I cannot see how St.Kilda's reputation has 'suffered' because of all of this.

        But I shouldn't really be saying this - I'm sure I will be accused of condoning rape or something crazy like that.

        Carry on
        The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

        Comment

        • goswannie14
          Leadership Group
          • Sep 2005
          • 11166

          #5
          Originally posted by CureTheSane
          Indeed.

          Seeems a bit of guilty until proven innocent to me.

          I cannot see how St.Kilda's reputation has 'suffered' because of all of this.

          But I shouldn't really be saying this - I'm sure I will be accused of condoning rape or something crazy like that.

          Carry on
          The only way that St Kildas "reputation" will be harmed is if there is any truth in the reported rumour that this happened whilst he was in the company of some of his team mates.

          This could all blow up in the face of the Aints, with the Players Association now weighing in, and hopefully it does and they go another year without a flag..
          Does God believe in Atheists?

          Comment

          • ScottH
            It's Goodes to cheer!!
            • Sep 2003
            • 23665

            #6
            Milne and Montagna already soiled their reputation.

            Comment

            • Cheer Squad
              Sydney Swans
              • Apr 2007
              • 1948

              #7
              Originally posted by CureTheSane
              Indeed.

              Seems a bit of guilty until proven innocent to me.

              I cannot see how St.Kilda's reputation has 'suffered' because of all of this.

              But I shouldn't really be saying this - I'm sure I will be accused of condoning rape or something crazy like that.

              Carry on
              I totally agree. Innocent until proven guilty is probably the most important principle underlying our society, and it's always getting put under pressure.

              That said, Lovett is probably his own worst enemy.

              Comment

              • liz
                Veteran
                Site Admin
                • Jan 2003
                • 16735

                #8
                The timing seems a bit odd. If he is guilty of the various contractual breaches the Saints have referred to, why did they wait until the day after he was charged with a criminal charge to sack him? Why didn't they do it some time ago?

                Comment

                • AnnieH
                  RWOs Black Sheep
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 11332

                  #9
                  Originally posted by liz
                  The timing seems a bit odd. If he is guilty of the various contractual breaches the Saints have referred to, why did they wait until the day after he was charged with a criminal charge to sack him? Why didn't they do it some time ago?
                  Because at the time they said that would wait until the official police investigation was over.

                  The police obviously think they have enough evidence to charge him.

                  It was the right time to terminate the contract.
                  Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                  Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                  Comment

                  • laughingnome
                    Amateur Statsman
                    • Jul 2006
                    • 1624

                    #10
                    Originally posted by goswannie14
                    The only way that St Kildas "reputation" will be harmed is if there is any truth in the reported rumour that this happened whilst he was in the company of some of his team mates.
                    It is possible, I feel, that if this goes to trial then football players will be called to give evidence in a public court of law. I believe this outcome likely given the alledged incident is meant to have happened at a team-mates house during a Christmas get-together. And that has the chance to destroy not only St Kilda's reputation but also their season.
                    10100111001 ;-)

                    Comment

                    • beameup
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 152

                      #11
                      If that is the case there is a good chance the season will be destroyed. Hopefully the case can be dealt with a little more than the much delayed Brett Stewart (NRL if anyone cares) charge. Long delays hurt everyone including the alleged victim.

                      Comment

                      • Dunger
                        Mudlark
                        • Jul 2007
                        • 122

                        #12
                        Originally posted by laughingnome
                        It is possible, I feel, that if this goes to trial then football players will be called to give evidence in a public court of law. I believe this outcome likely given the alledged incident is meant to have happened at a team-mates house during a Christmas get-together. And that has the chance to destroy not only St Kilda's reputation but also their season.
                        I think the legal system is gazelle like in it's agility and speed and will deal with this between season 2010 and 2011 just like Manly moron Brett Stewart.

                        Off topic: Manly kicked up a stink about Willie Mason... what about Stewart? I wouldn't want him near any club after his efforst. Masons biggest problem is he has a size 17 mouth with a size 16 foot in it all the time.

                        Comment

                        • Trickster
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Jul 2009
                          • 377

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Dunger
                          I think the legal system is gazelle like in it's agility and speed and will deal with this between season 2010 and 2011 just like Manly moron Brett Stewart.

                          Off topic: Manly kicked up a stink about Willie Mason... what about Stewart? I wouldn't want him near any club after his efforst. Masons biggest problem is he has a size 17 mouth with a size 16 foot in it all the time.
                          Read in the paper that the Roosters sold 56 memberships within two hours of announcing Mason was leaving the club, their membership has been going up a lot compared to last season, conversely the Cowboys have had a decrease in the number of people signing up since signing the lard mouth

                          Comment

                          • beameup
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 152

                            #14
                            THe smart ones were the Bulldogs who flicked him first chance they got. Clubs just cannot afford to keep idiots any more. Between media, sponsors and the commercial realities Saints have just told Lovett to get lost and we will wear the consequences. Smart decision I reckon

                            Comment

                            • cruiser
                              What the frack!
                              • Jul 2004
                              • 6114

                              #15
                              What is the issue with Willie Mason?

                              I dont think the Saints had much choice with Lovett although I agree that someone isnt guilty until the charges are proven.
                              Last edited by cruiser; 17 February 2010, 05:51 PM.
                              Occupational hazards:
                              I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
                              - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

                              Comment

                              Working...