If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
It was always going to be such a tough selection. Assuming Bradshaw is OK, this was the going to be the very best team the Football department could put on the field. (No disrepect to Craig Bird, but I do not think he would have made the top 22 if fully fit, maybe the top 25, but not the top 22).
Yes there are some disappointments, notably the three emergencies. Smith, Bevan and Rohan. But who do you leave out? I can only suggest that Kennedy and Moore were surprises, and McGlynn and Malceski, although both deserving selection on current form, were nevertheless not amongst the first two picked.
How is Bradshaw's fitness? Will he interchange with White at FF?
JF
Roos mentioned in an article that he'd play 80 minutes, I imagine that means he'll play from the goal square and when he's not on either Goodes or White will take that spot.
I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time
For all the dash we now appear to have from the back line, ie; Mal, Tige, Shaw, I see a potentual weakness in tackling and hardness. Particually against a side like St Kilda which is full of hardbodied players. I also think Smith is unlucky not to be playing. He would of been a good matchup on Schnieds or Milne.
Also O'Dwyer did everything right in the preseason games, I'm surprised he didn't even make the emergencies.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT
It was always going to be such a tough selection. Assuming Bradshaw is OK, this was the going to be the very best team the Football department could put on the field. (No disrepect to Craig Bird, but I do not think he would have made the top 22 if fully fit, maybe the top 25, but not the top 22).
Bird is in our Top 22 for mine, he replaces one of Moore or Kennedy
I suspect Smith missed because he didn't have a great game against Milne in the Knob Cup and doesn't deserve a spot in front of other. I'm sad to see ROK.
As for tackling hardness on 2009 rankings Kirk (1st) and Jude (3rd) and ROK (12) ably assisted by a combination of nice hard bodies in Matter Melcho Jack and McVeigh I think we will be ok.
It's very exciting.
I suspect Smith missed because he didn't have a great game against Milne in the Knob Cup and doesn't deserve a spot in front of other. I'm sad to see ROK.
As for tackling hardness on 2009 rankings Kirk (1st) and Jude (3rd) and ROK (12) ably assisted by a combination of nice hard bodies in Matter Melcho Jack and McVeigh I think we will be ok.
It's very exciting.
"I'm sad to see ROK" ??? ke
In terms of tackling and hardness at the contest, I'm refering to the halfbacks listed as starting....mal, tige, shaw. Three great running players with excellent skills....but they're not good tacklers. Hopefully the others you mentioned will pick up the slack.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT
I suspect Smith missed because he didn't have a great game against Milne in the Knob Cup and doesn't deserve a spot in front of other. I'm sad to see ROK.
As for tackling hardness on 2009 rankings Kirk (1st) and Jude (3rd) and ROK (12) ably assisted by a combination of nice hard bodies in Matter Melcho Jack and McVeigh I think we will be ok.
It's very exciting.
Did you mean 'not to see MOD'?
I agree with you about Smithy, who is a favourite of mine. I suspect it goes to show how hard it will be to hold a place in this team. Good for us.
And I think you're right about the tackling power - you could add LRT and Reg, wouldn't want to be monstered by them either.
He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)
Comment