Mitchell watch

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AnnieH
    RWOs Black Sheep
    • Aug 2006
    • 11332

    Originally posted by Dan
    Apparently the Hawks are offering a 5 year and 700k/year contract to Mitchell. I can handle losing him if we had to pay that much.
    Overs.
    Badly.


    They are taking Vickery. Apparently, you CAN have everyone.
    Are you sure they have a salary cap like everyone else?

    Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
    Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

    Comment

    • 0918330512
      Senior Player
      • Sep 2011
      • 1654

      Originally posted by Dan
      Apparently the Hawks are offering a 5 year and 700k/year contract to Mitchell. I can handle losing him if we had to pay that much.
      If $1M for 2 years for Vickery is accurate, the $700K/yr for Mitchell in comparison is probably relative. But most of the rest of their list must being under paid

      Comment

      • mcs
        Travelling Swannie!!
        • Jul 2007
        • 8150

        Originally posted by Dan
        Apparently the Hawks are offering a 5 year and 700k/year contract to Mitchell. I can handle losing him if we had to pay that much.
        so 700K a year for Mitchell, 500K a year for Vickery, who knows for O'Meara..... all I can say is there must be a big increase in the salary cap coming - veterans leaving or not, that is a lot of money to blow on 2 or maybe 3 players at most.
        "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

        Comment

        • waswan
          Senior Player
          • Oct 2015
          • 2047

          Play Hard ball, tell them there is no way we will deal with Hawks.
          Get him to Carlton and grab Gibbs

          Comment

          • 0918330512
            Senior Player
            • Sep 2011
            • 1654

            Originally posted by AnnieH
            AFL Trade Talk....
            39 minutes ago
            HARLEY HERE
            Sydney Swans GM of football Tom Harley has arrived and says the club has yet to hear from Tom Mitchell's manager. Phil Mullen.
            That reeks of Frank Cushman screwing over Jerry Maguire at the last minute. Phil, you unscrupulous little so&so

            Comment

            • goswannies
              Senior Player
              • Sep 2007
              • 3048

              I wonder if some of these player managers would be open to a little freelance work next time my EB is being negotiated at work

              Comment

              • Ludwig
                Veterans List
                • Apr 2007
                • 9359

                Originally posted by AnnieH
                Are you sure they have a salary cap like everyone else?
                Hawthorn were given our COLA as part of the Buddy Franklin deal. (Source: Tom Mitchell)

                Comment

                • goswannies
                  Senior Player
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 3048

                  I'm a bit miffed at this whole Tom situation. We pay him overs to sign in the first place (to keep him out of the clutches of GW$); we pay him overs to mainly play in the NEAFL for the first few years; he finally comes good & has publicly said he's happy at the Swans & is probably wanting market value (if the offers to Vickery & Wells are to be believed) & we look like send him off ... to Whorethorn (of all clubs!!). I understand list management issues (with Tip, Bud & securing our young talent in future) but it seems like such a waste.
                  Play hardball Swans. This isn't the same as other previous situations where we are a little more lenient in trades with players leaving for social/personal considerations, helping them to where they want to. If Tom is chasing the dollar, we should trade hard with no real care for his desires. Only our best interest!

                  Comment

                  • azzzr
                    Pushing for Selection
                    • Jun 2016
                    • 52

                    Originally posted by Dan
                    Apparently the Hawks are offering a 5 year and 700k/year contract to Mitchell. I can handle losing him if we had to pay that much.
                    That's from a very unreliable source the Twitter account it was "leaked" on was made today and that's it's first post... please if thats what we are trusting these days

                    Comment

                    • goswannies
                      Senior Player
                      • Sep 2007
                      • 3048

                      Originally posted by azzzr
                      That's from a very unreliable source the Twitter account it was "leaked" on was made today and that's it's first post... please if thats what we are trusting these days
                      LoL I hate this time of year for reason like this!

                      Comment

                      • Levii3
                        Regular in the Side
                        • Jun 2015
                        • 655

                        If Crows trade pick 13 for Bryce Gibbs we need Hawks pick 14 and something else in return otherwise its a bad deal for us.

                        Comment

                        • AnnieH
                          RWOs Black Sheep
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 11332

                          Whorethorn (goswannies... best. ever.) have just paid for Ty Vickery.
                          There's no way that they can afford Tom as well.
                          Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                          Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                          Comment

                          • swannymatt
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Oct 2016
                            • 10

                            Originally posted by AnnieH
                            Whorethorn (goswannies... best. ever.) have just paid for Ty Vickery.
                            There's no way that they can afford Tom as well.
                            Hope you're right there Annie. Does anyone else think that Vickery on $500k is a bit much??

                            Comment

                            • mattybloods
                              Warming the Bench
                              • Jul 2016
                              • 482

                              Originally posted by swannymatt
                              Hope you're right there Annie. Does anyone else think that Vickery on $500k is a bit much??
                              Yes

                              Comment

                              • Dosser
                                Just wild about Harry
                                • Mar 2011
                                • 1833

                                Mark Robinson on SEN thinks Mitchell is definitely gone.

                                Comment

                                Working...