White knight turns tide for Swans

[Red]

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/white-knight-turns-tide-for-swans-20100417-slf0.html

A fair if somewhat sobering assessment of our game yesterday and chances this year.

Apols if already posted.

[magic.merkin]

good article, though I take issue with:

"Bradshaw's hard work in tight traffic - not something for which the occasionally petulant Hall was always renowned - was just as important as his late goals."

Barry was unselfish and very hard working at ground level for the team.

[Kirkari]

A fair if somewhat sobering assessment of our game yesterday and chances this year.

Swans once again being short-changed by a journalist. Haaners just "used the ball well"? "Had a freakin' blinder" more like it. And as for Jesse turning the game around - give me a break!

[goswannie14]

Swans once again being short-changed by a journalist. Haaners just "used the ball well"? "Had a freakin' blinder" more like it. And as for Jesse turning the game around - give me a break!

Hmmm, no mention of North's best on ground.....umpire 17. As well as the fact that, apart from the umpires, North could only score 3 goals!!!!!

Also no mention of the amazing Mumford and the game he played. Oh well, in reality, who cares, he's only a journalist, not someone who actually knows anything.

[Primmy]

You wonder sometimes whether or not they actually watch the game, or whether its between pints at the bar, or half time reports over the back fence at a barbeque. Truly twit like.

[alison.z]

I don't normally take issue with these sort of articles but i seriously do not think that the person who wrote this (richard hinds i think??) actually watched the game - the analysis of the players and the game was almost completely incorrect!!