Melbourne Storm Salary Cap Breach. What would it do to the Swans.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Matty10
    Senior Player
    • Jun 2007
    • 1331

    #46
    I suppose that the difference with the Swans is that you have a long history to look back on and remember fondly - even if for most of their history they were not really that successful. Individual games, players performances, brownlow medalists, the history of community and re-establishment etc. The current players, coaches and administrators can all be replaced and the club would still have a great past to look back on with admiration and respect.

    The problem for the Storm is that when you strip them back there really isn't any other history to fall back on.

    Comment

    • Bloods05
      Senior Player
      • Oct 2008
      • 1641

      #47
      Originally posted by Primmy
      cheques and balances
      Love it.

      Comment

      • Damien
        Living in 2005
        • Jan 2003
        • 3713

        #48
        Carlton got to play and accrue points, they just lost draft picks. A lot different to the Storm situation where every game is a dead rubber. It would be so hard for fans to deal with 20 rounds of that.


        Originally posted by goswannie14
        That would be way above average for an NRL game.
        Slightly below average. 17K is the 2010 average for NRL, was 16K plus last year.

        Comment

        • goswannie14
          Leadership Group
          • Sep 2005
          • 11166

          #49
          Originally posted by Damien
          Carlton got to play and accrue points, they just lost draft picks. A lot different to the Storm situation where every game is a dead rubber. It would be so hard for fans to deal with 20 rounds of that.
          To say I am extremely pissed off would be an understatement.
          Does God believe in Atheists?

          Comment

          • ash3
            On the Rookie List
            • Jan 2008
            • 195

            #50
            Originally posted by goswannie14
            Just because you don't want it doesn't mean that is the general consensus. On the other hand, there are many people who say the same thing about Aussie Rules in Sydney. That being the case, the Swans should pack up and come back to Melbourne? Or does the argument you have put only work when it fits your parameters?
            By all means bring the swans back to Melbourne and take that crap back up to Sydney.

            Comment

            • smasher
              On the Rookie List
              • Jan 2005
              • 627

              #51
              Maybe the NRL should have given Storm the extra million in the salery cap that we get.(and Brisbane as well).Hindsight is a great thing.

              Comment

              • goswannie14
                Leadership Group
                • Sep 2005
                • 11166

                #52
                Originally posted by smasher
                Maybe the NRL should have given Storm the extra million in the salery cap that we get.(and Brisbane as well).Hindsight is a great thing.
                I had thought the same thing, although they wouldn't need anywhere need that much. For the previous 4 seasons the breach totalled $1,000,000.

                Interestingly, the Bulldogs were that amount over in 2 seasons and only copped a slap on the wrist compared to the Storm.
                Does God believe in Atheists?

                Comment

                • stellation
                  scott names the planets
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 9723

                  #53
                  I think that Sydney and Brisbane were allowed 115% of the salary cap and it looks lilke the Storm with their breaches would have spent about 110% of the salary cap.
                  I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                  We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                  Comment

                  • ROK Lobster
                    RWO Life Member
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 8658

                    #54
                    Pity that the NRL plays for a trophy and not prize like ours. The we could have made jokes about storms in premiershiip cups etc.

                    From a RWO point of view it would have been so much better if this had have blown up in the off season. We could have merged the thread with a death penalty one.

                    Comment

                    • goswannie14
                      Leadership Group
                      • Sep 2005
                      • 11166

                      #55
                      Originally posted by ROK Lobster
                      Pity that the NRL plays for a trophy and not prize like ours. The we could have made jokes about storms in premiershiip cups etc.

                      From a RWO point of view it would have been so much better if this had have blown up in the off season. We could have merged the thread with a death penalty one.
                      What happened to that annual thread this off season???
                      Does God believe in Atheists?

                      Comment

                      • Triple B
                        Formerly 'BBB'
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 6999

                        #56
                        Originally posted by goswannie14
                        What happened to that annual thread this off season???
                        That's what you get for punting Layby.

                        He was integral to all the feisty threads.
                        Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                        Comment

                        Working...