Why did we overlook Michael Barlow?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dawson
    Senior Player
    • Mar 2003
    • 1007

    #16
    Obviously all trade analysis is 20/20. For the most part we have done well. The only pick which really annoys me was Will Sangster

    Comment

    • ugg
      Can you feel it?
      Site Admin
      • Jan 2003
      • 15976

      #17
      Obviously Freo weren't that keen on him either, otherwise they would have picked him in the national draft. From what I understand, he had a few deficiencies in his game at the time of the draft that seem to have been fixed by the Freo coaching staff. So kudos to Freo's recruiting and coaching departments.
      Reserves live updates (Twitter)
      Reserves WIKI -
      Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

      Comment

      • dawson
        Senior Player
        • Mar 2003
        • 1007

        #18
        Originally posted by ugg
        Obviously Freo weren't that keen on him either, otherwise they would have picked him in the national draft. From what I understand, he had a few deficiencies in his game at the time of the draft that seem to have been fixed by the Freo coaching staff. So kudos to Freo's recruiting and coaching departments.
        Yeah at least we aren't Richmond who passed on him adding him to the illustrious list that includes having not one but two picks before Buddy Franklin went at Pick 5 and taking Aaron Fiora over Matthew Pavlich!

        Comment

        • Reggi
          On the Rookie List
          • Jan 2003
          • 2718

          #19
          The Melbourne papers during the draft period said we were going to pick him with our last pick, which we didn't do - going for TDL instead - who was touted to go earlier

          Once could have bought Manhattan for $2, what do you do, it happens
          You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby Ziegler

          Comment

          • ScottH
            It's Goodes to cheer!!
            • Sep 2003
            • 23665

            #20
            Originally posted by BSA5
            We've already got one.

            Comment

            • caj23
              Senior Player
              • Aug 2003
              • 2462

              #21
              Originally posted by dawson
              Obviously all trade analysis is 20/20. For the most part we have done well. The only pick which really annoys me was Will Sangster
              Oi!!!

              Comment

              • hammo
                Veterans List
                • Jul 2003
                • 5554

                #22
                Barlow would be competing for a spot with Bird and Hannebery, and probably also Kennedy and McGlynn, not to mention young mids like Meredith, Nick Smith, even Patty Veszpremi if he's going to eventually move into the centre. So while he's going really well for Freo, they (and Essendon!) had a greater need for him than the Swans.
                "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                Comment

                • giant
                  Veterans List
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 4731

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Will Sangster
                  Oi!!!
                  756 posts in 7 years? Must try harder!

                  Comment

                  • Big Al
                    Veterans List
                    • Feb 2005
                    • 7007

                    #24
                    Originally posted by giant
                    756 posts in 7 years? Must try harder!
                    Maybe he has a life...
                    ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                    Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                    Comment

                    • Primmy
                      Proud Tragic Swan
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 5970

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Reggi
                      The Melbourne papers during the draft period said we were going to pick him with our last pick, which we didn't do - going for TDL instead - who was touted to go earlier

                      Once could have bought Manhattan for $2, what do you do, it happens
                      If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                      Comment

                      • Captain
                        Captain of the Side
                        • Feb 2004
                        • 3602

                        #26
                        Originally posted by 707
                        Barlow was Freo's first pick in the Rookie Draft who took him two picks before our first pick so that is why we couldn't consider him.

                        I've had a look a the Rookie Draft thread, Matthew Panos who went with Rookie Draft pick 47 to the Bulldogs was the one most forumites were keen on, no mention by anyone of Barlow.

                        Let's see if Panos makes the grade.
                        Excellent points. Lot of pre season chat about Panos, none about Barlow.

                        Comment

                        • satchmopugdog
                          Bandicoots ears
                          • Apr 2004
                          • 3691

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Will Sangster
                          Oi!!!
                          I'm with you Will..that was a bit harsh....nearly spluttered my drink over the screen when I read that.
                          "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

                          Comment

                          • stellation
                            scott names the planets
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 9723

                            #28
                            Not pretty enough IMO.
                            I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                            We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                            Comment

                            Working...