HA HA! McLAREN....douchebag.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SwansFan1972
    On the Rookie List
    • Nov 2008
    • 621

    #16
    Originally posted by Matty10
    Considering how many games we have on Fox this year, if they were trying to hide him week-in, week-out, we would probably be the team most likely to get him. Although having said that, the results of the Richmond games have barely been in question this year - so that is where they should put McLaren if they wanted to lesson the potential for more controversy.
    Poor Tiges ... nothing like being kicked when you're down hey!

    Comment

    • Matty10
      Senior Player
      • Jun 2007
      • 1331

      #17
      Now I am really confused (and clearly the AFL are also):

      Rush of blood? No, Cale Hooker decision a good call says AFL | Herald Sun

      This rule is now a complete mess. If the AFL are stating that Hooker was not under pressure then how could the say that Slattery was in the game against the Hawks. The difference is slight and is a matter of degree not of kind. By taking that line it also makes the decision to drop McLaren disgraceful.

      As I stated in an earlier post the rule was introduced to stop players kicking or walking the ball through after a behind had been scored etc, or when there was no pressure at all - it was not meant for this type of scenario. If Hooker had fumbled the ball a second time and let Koschitzke get a metre closer, would he then be entitled to thump it over the line?

      Gieschen is a twit and the AFL should re-evaluate what they are tying to achieve (and then make it clear to all and sundry).

      Comment

      • dimelb
        pr. dim-melb; m not f
        • Jun 2003
        • 6889

        #18
        Originally posted by Triple B
        I agree.

        Let's start with Ray McChamberlain.
        I wish I'd said that, Oscar!
        He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

        Comment

        Working...