Sydney Swans Vs Geelong Cats Game Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Reggi
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 2718

    Mum took priority. Any views on how Pyke went? Stats look Ok for a first game but can be miss-leading.

    Personally I think it's unrealistic to be competitive with a really good side missing LRT, C Bolton, McGlynn, Seaby, Hanners and Bird from our best side, plus I would be surprised if J Bolton, O'Keefe, Moore etc could back up after Brisbane

    Unfortunately our depth is being tested already
    You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby Ziegler

    Comment

    • hammo
      Veterans List
      • Jul 2003
      • 5554

      In the press conference Roos said he didn't bother tagging Ablett because he didn't think it would work. If coaches were awarded clangers surely that would be one of them. When the game was getting away from us in the third, a hard tag was required. Smith was the obvious choice for mine.

      In contrast our best midfielder - McVeigh - was taken out of the game by Ling. We had no one else capable of clearing it.
      "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

      Comment

      • Triple B
        Formerly 'BBB'
        • Feb 2003
        • 6999

        Originally posted by Reggi
        Any views on how Pyke went?
        He didn't star, but more than held his own.

        I'd reckon Roosy will sleep a bit better tonight with the thought of the next 3 months not being as big as a concern as it may have been.
        Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

        Comment

        • Triple B
          Formerly 'BBB'
          • Feb 2003
          • 6999

          Originally posted by hammo
          In the press conference Roos said he didn't bother tagging Ablett because he didn't think it would work. If coaches were awarded clangers surely that would be one of them. When the game was getting away from us in the third, a hard tag was required. Smith was the obvious choice for mine.

          In contrast our best midfielder - McVeigh - was taken out of the game by Ling. We had no one else capable of clearing it.
          Hammo, I know where he is coming from. Ablett is almost un-taggable and we certainly have nobody capable of putting a hard tag on him.

          Your last sentence may hold a clue to a solution of sorts. Although McV is past the tagger stage, if he is not getting a kick because Ling is smothering him, he may as well go and tag Ablett and let Bomber worry about what to do with Lingy.
          Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

          Comment

          • Robbo
            On the Rookie List
            • May 2007
            • 2946

            I think it's fair to say Ablett ripped us a few new one's today. Why wasn't he tagged again?

            Comment

            • Reggi
              On the Rookie List
              • Jan 2003
              • 2718

              Originally posted by Triple B
              He didn't star, but more than held his own.

              I'd reckon Roosy will sleep a bit better tonight with the thought of the next 3 months not being as big as a concern as it may have been.
              Great as long as he can hold his own and give Mumford a chop out our season stays alive, if he doesn't we're shot. Too hard to ruck through a season without support especially as actually Mumford only has about 20 games more experience
              You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby Ziegler

              Comment

              • liz
                Veteran
                Site Admin
                • Jan 2003
                • 16778

                Because we had no-one capable of tagging him.

                Commentators kept going on about how Ling was shutting down McVeigh, but I thought McVeigh's use when he did get the ball was good. He was one of the few out there, especially forward of the centre, who actually tried to use the ball constructively going forward, rather than just aimlessly bombing it towards the general direction of Bradshaw.

                Comment

                • Robbo
                  On the Rookie List
                  • May 2007
                  • 2946

                  Originally posted by liz
                  Because we had no-one capable of tagging him.

                  Commentators kept going on about how Ling was shutting down McVeigh, but I thought McVeigh's use when he did get the ball was good. He was one of the few out there, especially forward of the centre, who actually tried to use the ball constructively going forward, rather than just aimlessly bombing it towards the general direction of Bradshaw.


                  That may be true but you still have to try.

                  Richmond aren't capable of beating Geelong but they still had to rock up last week and have a crack at it.

                  Comment

                  • aardvark
                    Veterans List
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 5685

                    I thought Kennelly Smith and Mummy were ok in a team badly defeated. Pyke did better than i expected and could be ok. He already knows more about AFL than ED Barlow. Gary Rohan WILL be a player!!

                    Comment

                    • Bas
                      Veterans List
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 4457

                      Beaten by a superior team and hopefully some lessons learned.

                      Dare I say - "IT was the loss that we had to have"

                      From roosters to feather dusters, at least we are off the top of the ladder but still in the top 8.
                      In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

                      Comment

                      • hot potato
                        Sir Ashmole Gruntbucket
                        • Jun 2007
                        • 1122

                        What was the problem with LRT today, he was a big out.

                        hp
                        "He was proud of us when we won and he was still proud of us when we lost' Tami Roos about Paul Sept 06.

                        Comment

                        • aardvark
                          Veterans List
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 5685

                          Hammy tightness, will be right for the doggies

                          Comment

                          • giant
                            Veterans List
                            • Mar 2005
                            • 4731

                            Originally posted by liz
                            Because we had no-one capable of tagging him.

                            Commentators kept going on about how Ling was shutting down McVeigh, but I thought McVeigh's use when he did get the ball was good. He was one of the few out there, especially forward of the centre, who actually tried to use the ball constructively going forward, rather than just aimlessly bombing it towards the general direction of Bradshaw.
                            THought McV had a pretty good second half - if our clearance rate was up it was pretty much due to him, and he used it pretty well.

                            Comment

                            • giant
                              Veterans List
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 4731

                              Originally posted by aardvark
                              I thought Kennelly Smith and Mummy were ok in a team badly defeated. Pyke did better than i expected and could be ok. He already knows more about AFL than ED Barlow. Gary Rohan WILL be a player!!
                              Mummy was horrid - Pyke was considerably better than him. Varcoe kicked three goals on Tadhg. There were very few in the r&w who leaved Skill Stadium with any pride today I'm afraid.

                              Comment

                              • ugg
                                Can you feel it?
                                Site Admin
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 15970

                                Originally posted by giant
                                Mummy was horrid - Pyke was considerably better than him. Varcoe kicked three goals on Tadhg. There were very few in the r&w who leaved Skill Stadium with any pride today I'm afraid.
                                Pyke was good, didn't think Mummy was horrid. Blake probably took the points in the end, but not by much. Malceski was playing on Varcoe IIRC.
                                Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                                Reserves WIKI -
                                Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                                Comment

                                Working...