Changes for next week.

[ScottH]

Big names to return for Swans - AFL.com.au

"We think Ben McGlynn would be back and maybe Dan Hannebury, and Lewis Roberts-Thompson will definitely play," Roos said.

Chop, Chop time!!

Barlow, Rohan , Ted, Moore????

[Jewels]

Big names to return for Swans - AFL.com.au



Chop, Chop time!!

Barlow, Rohan , Ted, Moore????

I don't think Rohan should get the chop, I think Jets would benefit from a run in the 2's, get a feeling for the goals again and I wouldn't have thought Moore would go unless he's injured.

[Captain]

Barlow - definitely (for LRT)
Moore - definitely (for McGlynn)
Rohan or Smith - potentially (for Hanners)

[lwjoyner]

Barlow, mark papers 2nds footballer only. Ted Richards struggled as did Moore,but so did Goodsey and Braddy. Agree that Lewis probably needs a run in 2's to regain some confidence.

[Turnz]

Jetta needs a run in the 2nd's. His skills today I thought were very poor, his kicking needs to improve but his only young.

Hopefully we don't see Barlow again, his was probably in our worst 5 players today.

Changes might be something like this:

INS: Mcglynn, Hanners, LRT
OUTS: Barlow, Jetta, Smith

[Jewels]

Jetta needs a run in the 2nd's. His skills today I thought were very poor, his kicking needs to improve but his only young.

Hopefully we don't see Barlow again, his was probably in our worst 5 players today.

Changes might be something like this:

INS: Mcglynn, Hanners, LRT
OUTS: Barlow, Jetta, Smith

Surely this is a mistake, I thought Nick was one of the few that could actually hold his head up.

[stellation]

Outs should be Barlow, Moore, Richards IMO.

[goswannie14]

@@@@ some of you are hard markers. One bad game for Moore and you have him in the 2's.

[31 hard at it]

Roos press conference made it clear that Ed Barlow needs to access where he is with his football and where he stands iin the playing list.
Clearly not good enough today despite a couple of good plays ... makes it all the more frustrating !

[stellation]

@@@@ some of you are hard markers. One bad game for Moore and you have him in the 2's.

I like Moore, he's one of my favourite guys in the team. If they have to make way for 3 spots and one of those a returning from injury McGlynn then I'm afraid I think I go with bulldog. I thought Rohan did enough hard work in that game to earn another run, and I do put the input of Jetta's value to the team's structure overall to be higher than Moore's.

[Gary]

It is a little hard to see why the fact that Barlow does not have the skills / composure to play firsts has taken this long to work out?

[liz]

Moore out only if he's injured. Anyone suggesting Smith is in even the slightest danger didn't watch the same game I did this afternoon (or last Saturday night). Barlow is a no-brainer. I am a Ted fan but he was out of his depth today trying to play key position. Not sure that the Dogs have enough tall foward targets to make him a priority next week.

If all three of the ins are ready (and Moore is fine), that probably leaves one of Jetta or Rohan to miss. I don't subscribe to the theory that "Jetta needs a run in the twos" but I think it would be rough on Rohan to depart after that baptism of fire. Jetta has had a chance to string some games together. Would be nice to see Rohan get a chance too.

[liz]

I thought Rohan didn't enough hard work in that game to earn another run.

Did or didn't??

[chalbilto]

@@@@ some of you are hard markers. One bad game for Moore and you have him in the 2's.

Ditto.

Barlow, Ted, Jetta ( recharge in 2's if not then Rohan)

[gumby_bolts]

@@@@ some of you are hard markers. One bad game for Moore and you have him in the 2's.

I agree, can't believe moore and smith are even being mentioned.