Changes for next week.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ScottH
    It's Goodes to cheer!!
    • Sep 2003
    • 23665

    Changes for next week.


    Big names to return for Swans - AFL.com.au


    "We think Ben McGlynn would be back and maybe Dan Hannebury, and Lewis Roberts-Thompson will definitely play," Roos said.
    Chop, Chop time!!

    Barlow, Rohan , Ted, Moore????
  • Jewels
    On the Rookie List
    • Oct 2006
    • 3258

    #2
    Originally posted by ScottH

    Big names to return for Swans - AFL.com.au




    Chop, Chop time!!

    Barlow, Rohan , Ted, Moore????
    I don't think Rohan should get the chop, I think Jets would benefit from a run in the 2's, get a feeling for the goals again and I wouldn't have thought Moore would go unless he's injured.

    Comment

    • Captain
      Captain of the Side
      • Feb 2004
      • 3602

      #3
      Barlow - definitely (for LRT)
      Moore - definitely (for McGlynn)
      Rohan or Smith - potentially (for Hanners)

      Comment

      • lwjoyner
        Regular in the Side
        • Nov 2004
        • 952

        #4
        Barlow, mark papers 2nds footballer only. Ted Richards struggled as did Moore,but so did Goodsey and Braddy. Agree that Lewis probably needs a run in 2's to regain some confidence.

        Comment

        • Turnz
          On the Rookie List
          • May 2010
          • 4

          #5
          Jetta needs a run in the 2nd's. His skills today I thought were very poor, his kicking needs to improve but his only young.

          Hopefully we don't see Barlow again, his was probably in our worst 5 players today.

          Changes might be something like this:

          INS: Mcglynn, Hanners, LRT
          OUTS: Barlow, Jetta, Smith
          Forget about Hall, it's all about Bradshaw

          Comment

          • Jewels
            On the Rookie List
            • Oct 2006
            • 3258

            #6
            Originally posted by Turnz
            Jetta needs a run in the 2nd's. His skills today I thought were very poor, his kicking needs to improve but his only young.

            Hopefully we don't see Barlow again, his was probably in our worst 5 players today.

            Changes might be something like this:

            INS: Mcglynn, Hanners, LRT
            OUTS: Barlow, Jetta, Smith
            Surely this is a mistake, I thought Nick was one of the few that could actually hold his head up.

            Comment

            • stellation
              scott names the planets
              • Sep 2003
              • 9720

              #7
              Outs should be Barlow, Moore, Richards IMO.
              I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
              We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

              Comment

              • goswannie14
                Leadership Group
                • Sep 2005
                • 11166

                #8
                @@@@ some of you are hard markers. One bad game for Moore and you have him in the 2's.
                Does God believe in Atheists?

                Comment

                • 31 hard at it
                  Regular in the Side
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 550

                  #9
                  Roos press conference made it clear that Ed Barlow needs to access where he is with his football and where he stands iin the playing list.
                  Clearly not good enough today despite a couple of good plays ... makes it all the more frustrating !

                  Comment

                  • stellation
                    scott names the planets
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 9720

                    #10
                    Originally posted by goswannie14
                    @@@@ some of you are hard markers. One bad game for Moore and you have him in the 2's.
                    I like Moore, he's one of my favourite guys in the team. If they have to make way for 3 spots and one of those a returning from injury McGlynn then I'm afraid I think I go with bulldog. I thought Rohan did enough hard work in that game to earn another run, and I do put the input of Jetta's value to the team's structure overall to be higher than Moore's.
                    Last edited by stellation; 9 May 2010, 08:07 PM. Reason: -'nt
                    I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                    We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                    Comment

                    • Gary
                      Regular in the Side
                      • Sep 2005
                      • 608

                      #11
                      It is a little hard to see why the fact that Barlow does not have the skills / composure to play firsts has taken this long to work out?

                      Comment

                      • liz
                        Veteran
                        Site Admin
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 16773

                        #12
                        Moore out only if he's injured. Anyone suggesting Smith is in even the slightest danger didn't watch the same game I did this afternoon (or last Saturday night). Barlow is a no-brainer. I am a Ted fan but he was out of his depth today trying to play key position. Not sure that the Dogs have enough tall foward targets to make him a priority next week.

                        If all three of the ins are ready (and Moore is fine), that probably leaves one of Jetta or Rohan to miss. I don't subscribe to the theory that "Jetta needs a run in the twos" but I think it would be rough on Rohan to depart after that baptism of fire. Jetta has had a chance to string some games together. Would be nice to see Rohan get a chance too.

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16773

                          #13
                          Originally posted by stellation
                          I thought Rohan didn't enough hard work in that game to earn another run.
                          Did or didn't??

                          Comment

                          • chalbilto
                            Senior Player
                            • Oct 2007
                            • 1139

                            #14
                            Originally posted by goswannie14
                            @@@@ some of you are hard markers. One bad game for Moore and you have him in the 2's.
                            Ditto.

                            Barlow, Ted, Jetta ( recharge in 2's if not then Rohan)

                            Comment

                            • gumby_bolts
                              Warming the Bench
                              • Jul 2006
                              • 255

                              #15
                              Originally posted by goswannie14
                              @@@@ some of you are hard markers. One bad game for Moore and you have him in the 2's.
                              I agree, can't believe moore and smith are even being mentioned.

                              Comment

                              Working...