Shaw

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mcs
    Travelling Swannie!!
    • Jul 2007
    • 8168

    #16
    Shaw was easily one of our best today I thought. Never stopped trying and got more than enough ball, and his disposal was ok. Stepped up well I thought in the absence of the Irishman.
    "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

    Comment

    • Jesse Richards
      On the Rookie List
      • Mar 2010
      • 292

      #17
      Last year he was the Irishman.

      Comment

      • Big Al
        Veterans List
        • Feb 2005
        • 7007

        #18
        Re: Shaw

        Originally posted by Southern Swan15
        Reece Shaw, he was good last year, 2010 however he is looking like a bloke who has no idear. Poor spoiling, poor decision making,poor maning up, poor everything really. He tries to get involved but his 1 good moment is outwayed by his 15 poor moments. God he is making bevan look like a brownlow medialist at the moment.

        why is this??? did he over achieve last year or is he just having a bad start to 2010?
        You need a sponsor... May I suggest the same mob who sponsors the umpires.
        ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

        Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

        Comment

        • goswannie14
          Leadership Group
          • Sep 2005
          • 11166

          #19
          Originally posted by Damien
          Shocked by this thread. Shaw was one of our better players today, his run off half back and 2nd efforts placed him in a minority.
          I was shocked by the spelling in this thread, then I saw the content and thought someone was really taking the piss.

          Originally posted by Big Al
          You need a sponsor... May I suggest the same mob who sponsors the umpires.
          Yep I agree, it helps if people actually watch the game before making stupid comments.
          Does God believe in Atheists?

          Comment

          • Lucky Knickers
            Fandom of Fabulousness
            • Oct 2003
            • 4220

            #20
            Originally posted by Robbo
            Could be forced out soon IMO. Heath looked very promising today and I would be dissapointed if he was dropped ahead of Shaw.
            Heath in for Shaw? If you meant Heath Shaw I would agree.

            Comment

            • Kirkari
              On the Rookie List
              • Aug 2009
              • 1036

              #21
              Originally posted by Lucky Knickers
              Heath in for Shaw? If you meant Heath Shaw I would agree.
              Ha ha ha - nice.
              Superman still wears Brett Kirk Pyjamas

              Comment

              • Wardy
                The old Boiler!
                • Sep 2003
                • 6676

                #22
                I noticed that he got more of a chance to have a run yesterday and the reason was that Kennelly was off the ground. Shaws game has been stiffled somewhat since TK's return - and he's been pushed a bit to the background. Yesterday he made some great breaks - like he did last year.
                I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
                Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
                AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

                Comment

                • Jewels
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 3258

                  #23
                  I was stunned when I read the first four posts of this thread and thought I must be going mad. I think Shaw was one of our better players yesterday and his run will be invaluable if Tiger is out for any length of time.

                  Comment

                  • Melbourne_Blood
                    Senior Player
                    • May 2010
                    • 3312

                    #24
                    I love Shaws run, but it seems like more often than not his kicks end up going to Nobody or to the opposition.

                    Can't fault his effort on the weekend though.

                    He does seem to be always whingeing to his teammates or umpires

                    Comment

                    • swansrule100
                      The quarterback
                      • May 2004
                      • 4538

                      #25
                      its bloody annoying how often the commentators call him heath
                      Theres not much left to say

                      Comment

                      • ScottH
                        It's Goodes to cheer!!
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 23665

                        #26
                        Shaw is no where near our best, but he is certainly no where near our worst either.
                        Without he and Tadgh, we'd have no drive at all out of the backline.

                        Comment

                        • Margo
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Jul 2009
                          • 138

                          #27
                          Very unfair comments. This guy puts in 100% all game, every game. Exciting to watch and usually reliable. The disposals across the team were relatively poor on Sat. but no need to put the boot in to one of our best on ground.

                          Comment

                          Working...