Hanners and the Rising Star

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • swansrob
    Senior Player
    • May 2009
    • 1265

    Hanners and the Rising Star

    I just read this article about Dustin Martin, and at the end, it goes through the top 5 Rising Star nominees in a number of stats. Hanners makes these lists once (4th for contested possesions).
    Does that seem a little strange to anyone else given he's the favourite to take it out?
    Link - He's strong and he's bold
  • BSA5
    Senior Player
    • Feb 2008
    • 2522

    #2
    A bit odd perhaps, but it makes a certain sort of sense. Hanners is a very complete player with no particular dominant aspect. He can win both contested and uncontested ball, he can drift forward and kick goals, he has at times had to deal with tags, and he is a very good mark (but obviously can't be expected to compete with his KP fellow nominees). He is also playing with a far more experienced and well established midfield than most others, meaning he is often relegated to roles on the wing and with less game time than he might otherwise get, but his class, talent and input is still very obviously there to see despite this. He has also played very, very regularly, while some others clogging up those top 5 stats have played less than 5 games this year. He has also, importantly, shown an ability to take charge, show leadership, and put in genuine BOG (or near enough) performances, which very few RS eligible players have done.

    While I don't think Hanners is anywhere near a certainty for the RS, stats certainly don't tell the whole story. He'd be top 10 in all of those stats mentioned the article, which I would hazard to guess few other nominees could boast, has done this with less opportunity (structurally speaking) than most, and has at times taken his game to a greater, more dominant level than most, if not all, of the nominees.

    In saying that, if Martin was eligible, I reckon he'd deserve it. He has been fantastic for the Tigers this year.
    Last edited by BSA5; 1 August 2010, 06:12 PM.
    Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

    Comment

    • RogueSwan
      McVeigh for Brownlow
      • Apr 2003
      • 4602

      #3
      Originally posted by BSA5
      ...
      In saying that, if Martin was eligible, I reckon he'd deserve it. He has been fantastic for the Tigers this year.
      Worthy of pick 7 and 14?
      "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

      Comment

      • BSA5
        Senior Player
        • Feb 2008
        • 2522

        #4
        Originally posted by RogueSwan
        Worthy of pick 7 and 14?
        Yes, but maybe not pick 6 and 14!
        Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

        Comment

        • RogueSwan
          McVeigh for Brownlow
          • Apr 2003
          • 4602

          #5
          Originally posted by BSA5
          Yes, but maybe not pick 6 and 14!
          oops, missed by a behind.
          "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

          Comment

          • smasher
            On the Rookie List
            • Jan 2005
            • 627

            #6
            The money is coming for Hurley from Essendon.

            Comment

            • UglyDuckling
              On the Rookie List
              • Aug 2008
              • 452

              #7
              Originally posted by smasher
              The money is coming for Hurley from Essendon.
              It because hurley is ridiculously overrated in melbourne. He plays 1 good game and the media start talking about him like he's Gary Ablett.

              Comment

              Working...