Jetta signs contract extension

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ScottH
    It's Goodes to cheer!!
    • Sep 2003
    • 23665

    #16
    Originally posted by Captain
    I reckon that Bevan will most likely go to GWS.
    Wishful thinking??

    Comment

    • i'm-uninformed2
      Reefer Madness
      • Oct 2003
      • 4653

      #17
      A bit of a 'what if' question.

      Apparently prior to the draft in which we nabbed Rohan and Jetta we offered Richmond pick 6 and 14 in exchange for pick 3, knowing Dustin Martin would be available given Melbourne's commitment to Scully and Trengrove.

      No offence to either Rohan or Jetta, but after watching Martin's game yesterday against Norf, it's easy to see why we were so red hot on nabbing him.

      On balance, I reckon we needed the pace of the two we got, but Martin is one mother...... of a player.
      'Delicious' is a fun word to say

      Comment

      • Captain
        Captain of the Side
        • Feb 2004
        • 3602

        #18
        Originally posted by ScottH
        Wishful thinking??
        haha maybe. It makes sense though - feels hard done by, is a Western Suburbs boy and sought a trade last year. If he gets dropped at some stage this year and is out of the team for a while, he will go.

        Would be a good get for GWS.

        Comment

        • Bas
          Veterans List
          • Jan 2003
          • 4457

          #19
          Don't forget free agency coming in at the end of this year.

          So if GWS throws a bag of money at either Goodes, ROK, Bolton and anyone else who qualifies then it can become an issue.
          In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

          Comment

          • liz
            Veteran
            Site Admin
            • Jan 2003
            • 16786

            #20
            Originally posted by Bas
            Don't forget free agency coming in at the end of this year.

            So if GWS throws a bag of money at either Goodes, ROK, Bolton and anyone else who qualifies then it can become an issue.
            I think we're pretty safe with Goodes and Jude, and probably so with ROK given he's stuck it out to this point in his career. It is the players in the 25-27 age range that will be at risk. We don't really have too many of those at the moment but our 19-24 year olds will get there sooner rather than later.

            Comment

            • Auntie.Gerald
              Veterans List
              • Oct 2009
              • 6483

              #21
              My guess is that GWS will target

              i) Bevo
              ii) Pyke
              iii) ROK
              iv) a tall back ?........Spangher depending on contract??

              I am guessing that ROK will be offered some decent coin to go to GWS which we probably cant match if we want to keep all our important youth..........where as Jude I think we can retain for one more year if he is keen and has the energy in the legs for another season as Kirky looked like he lost the spring in his step in his last year of footy.

              I would be surprised if Luke Parker and Rohan are not ready for a midfield rotation 2012..........
              "be tough, only when it gets tough"

              Comment

              • swansrule100
                The quarterback
                • May 2004
                • 4538

                #22
                Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
                My guess is that GWS will target

                i) Bevo
                ii) Pyke
                iii) ROK
                iv) a tall back ?........Spangher depending on contract??
                ....
                wouldnt be the end of the world to lose any of those
                Theres not much left to say

                Comment

                • Auntie.Gerald
                  Veterans List
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 6483

                  #23
                  young Tom Mitchell sounds very very exciting also hence me thinking we need to spread our money around the juniors next year

                  Swans swoop on Barry Mitchell's son
                  "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                  Comment

                  • RogueSwan
                    McVeigh for Brownlow
                    • Apr 2003
                    • 4602

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Matt79
                    I'd imagine we'd have some cash to splash around too? Goodsey and perhaps ROK would come under the Vetren's list? I do not know the fine print, however, I think that means they are / would be exempt from the salary cap?
                    From the AFLPA's CBA 2007-2011

                    13.2 Player is eligible for inclusion on an AFL Club?s Veterans List or to be classified
                    as a veteran, on the Primary List if:

                    (a) the Player has been at the AFL Club on the Primary List for at least ten (10) years; and

                    (b)the Player is 30 years of age or older as at 30 September in the relevant AFL Season,
                    and
                    13.3

                    For Total Player Payment purposes, a proportion (as set out in the following table)
                    of Football Payments to each Veteran shall be excluded from Total Player
                    Payments, such proportion to vary depending on the number of Veterans at each
                    Club:

                    I s'pose that is why some contracts are back ended, to limit the impact on the salary cap.
                    "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                    Comment

                    • DST
                      The voice of reason!
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 2705

                      #25
                      Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                      A bit of a 'what if' question.

                      Apparently prior to the draft in which we nabbed Rohan and Jetta we offered Richmond pick 6 and 14 in exchange for pick 3, knowing Dustin Martin would be available given Melbourne's commitment to Scully and Trengrove.

                      No offence to either Rohan or Jetta, but after watching Martin's game yesterday against Norf, it's easy to see why we were so red hot on nabbing him.

                      On balance, I reckon we needed the pace of the two we got, but Martin is one mother...... of a player.
                      We had always targeted Martin in that draft at pick 6, we were red hot for him and you can see why immediately when he plays.

                      Unfortunately his draft testing was so good he went from 6 to 3 (picks 4 and 5 were already heading elswhere with for those clubs).

                      You can definately see why we offered picks 6 and 14 for 3 and I don't think any of us would be upset if that deal was done.

                      DST
                      "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

                      Comment

                      • swansrob
                        Senior Player
                        • May 2009
                        • 1265

                        #26
                        Didn't Rohan say in an interview that he signed a three year deal??

                        Comment

                        • ABloodsMan
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Apr 2011
                          • 232

                          #27
                          Originally posted by swansrob
                          Didn't Rohan say in an interview that he signed a three year deal??
                          I remember something similar. I thought we signed him on a 3 year contract when we drafted him.

                          Comment

                          • Nico
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 11343

                            #28
                            Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                            A bit of a 'what if' question.

                            Apparently prior to the draft in which we nabbed Rohan and Jetta we offered Richmond pick 6 and 14 in exchange for pick 3, knowing Dustin Martin would be available given Melbourne's commitment to Scully and Trengrove.

                            No offence to either Rohan or Jetta, but after watching Martin's game yesterday against Norf, it's easy to see why we were so red hot on nabbing him.

                            On balance, I reckon we needed the pace of the two we got, but Martin is one mother...... of a player.
                            Richmond plays Martin every week so he is developing rapidly. Rohan has been our sub of the month for April. For crying out bloody loud get this bloke in the 21 and leave him there.
                            http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                            Comment

                            • Nico
                              Veterans List
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 11343

                              #29
                              Originally posted by DST
                              We had always targeted Martin in that draft at pick 6, we were red hot for him and you can see why immediately when he plays.

                              Unfortunately his draft testing was so good he went from 6 to 3 (picks 4 and 5 were already heading elswhere with for those clubs).

                              You can definately see why we offered picks 6 and 14 for 3 and I don't think any of us would be upset if that deal was done.

                              DST
                              Lets hope Mitchell lives up to expectations. If he is the best of his age then hopefully we get the equal of martin.
                              http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                              Comment

                              • Auntie.Gerald
                                Veterans List
                                • Oct 2009
                                • 6483

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Nico
                                Richmond plays Martin every week so he is developing rapidly. Rohan has been our sub of the month for April. For crying out bloody loud get this bloke in the 21 and leave him there.
                                i think Rohan is still best as an impact player for now..............in 6 rounds could be different ?

                                reason being he is not consistent enough yet in the larger minutes he played lat year and he has real impact when he strolls on in the last qtr
                                "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                                Comment

                                Working...