Jetta signs contract extension
Collapse
X
-
A bit of a 'what if' question.
Apparently prior to the draft in which we nabbed Rohan and Jetta we offered Richmond pick 6 and 14 in exchange for pick 3, knowing Dustin Martin would be available given Melbourne's commitment to Scully and Trengrove.
No offence to either Rohan or Jetta, but after watching Martin's game yesterday against Norf, it's easy to see why we were so red hot on nabbing him.
On balance, I reckon we needed the pace of the two we got, but Martin is one mother...... of a player.'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
Comment
-
Don't forget free agency coming in at the end of this year.
So if GWS throws a bag of money at either Goodes, ROK, Bolton and anyone else who qualifies then it can become an issue.In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.Comment
-
I think we're pretty safe with Goodes and Jude, and probably so with ROK given he's stuck it out to this point in his career. It is the players in the 25-27 age range that will be at risk. We don't really have too many of those at the moment but our 19-24 year olds will get there sooner rather than later.Comment
-
My guess is that GWS will target
i) Bevo
ii) Pyke
iii) ROK
iv) a tall back ?........Spangher depending on contract??
I am guessing that ROK will be offered some decent coin to go to GWS which we probably cant match if we want to keep all our important youth..........where as Jude I think we can retain for one more year if he is keen and has the energy in the legs for another season as Kirky looked like he lost the spring in his step in his last year of footy.
I would be surprised if Luke Parker and Rohan are not ready for a midfield rotation 2012.........."be tough, only when it gets tough"
Comment
-
Comment
-
young Tom Mitchell sounds very very exciting also hence me thinking we need to spread our money around the juniors next year
Swans swoop on Barry Mitchell's son"be tough, only when it gets tough"
Comment
-
13.2 Player is eligible for inclusion on an AFL Club?s Veterans List or to be classified
as a veteran, on the Primary List if:
(a) the Player has been at the AFL Club on the Primary List for at least ten (10) years; and
(b)the Player is 30 years of age or older as at 30 September in the relevant AFL Season,
13.3
For Total Player Payment purposes, a proportion (as set out in the following table)
of Football Payments to each Veteran shall be excluded from Total Player
Payments, such proportion to vary depending on the number of Veterans at each
Club:
"Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017Comment
-
A bit of a 'what if' question.
Apparently prior to the draft in which we nabbed Rohan and Jetta we offered Richmond pick 6 and 14 in exchange for pick 3, knowing Dustin Martin would be available given Melbourne's commitment to Scully and Trengrove.
No offence to either Rohan or Jetta, but after watching Martin's game yesterday against Norf, it's easy to see why we were so red hot on nabbing him.
On balance, I reckon we needed the pace of the two we got, but Martin is one mother...... of a player.
Unfortunately his draft testing was so good he went from 6 to 3 (picks 4 and 5 were already heading elswhere with for those clubs).
You can definately see why we offered picks 6 and 14 for 3 and I don't think any of us would be upset if that deal was done.
DST"Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"
Comment
-
Comment
-
A bit of a 'what if' question.
Apparently prior to the draft in which we nabbed Rohan and Jetta we offered Richmond pick 6 and 14 in exchange for pick 3, knowing Dustin Martin would be available given Melbourne's commitment to Scully and Trengrove.
No offence to either Rohan or Jetta, but after watching Martin's game yesterday against Norf, it's easy to see why we were so red hot on nabbing him.
On balance, I reckon we needed the pace of the two we got, but Martin is one mother...... of a player.Comment
-
We had always targeted Martin in that draft at pick 6, we were red hot for him and you can see why immediately when he plays.
Unfortunately his draft testing was so good he went from 6 to 3 (picks 4 and 5 were already heading elswhere with for those clubs).
You can definately see why we offered picks 6 and 14 for 3 and I don't think any of us would be upset if that deal was done.
DSTComment
-
reason being he is not consistent enough yet in the larger minutes he played lat year and he has real impact when he strolls on in the last qtr"be tough, only when it gets tough"
Comment
Comment