Changes for Rnd 7 v Bulldogs (Nipper Gordon to debut!)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BSA5
    Senior Player
    • Feb 2008
    • 2522

    #76
    Originally posted by ugg
    Interesting that in this afternoon's press conference, Nathan Gordon was the first name to come out of Horse's mouth when asked who may replace Kieren and/or changes to the side. Obviously not a like-for-like swap but Nipper's been getting the votes in the reserves. He named Luke Parker, Lewis Johnston and almost as an afterthought Brett Meredith.
    Even though I don't think Gordon has what it takes to make it at AFL level, there's only one way to find out for sure, so it could be worth a go.
    Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

    Comment

    • swansrule100
      The quarterback
      • May 2004
      • 4538

      #77
      Originally posted by liz
      Don't think it is that straightforward. I never understood exactly why Fosdike's retirement didn't qualify as a LTI - maybe it was because he didn't actually have an injury then and there that prevented him from taking to the ground. But when Paul Williams was forced into retirement midway through a season with a shoulder injury, we elevated a rookie in his place - Phillips, I believe it was, who made his debut the very week Willo retired.
      isnt it linked to the the vetrans list? if you dont have two nominated you can promote a rookie instead the year willo went down did we only have one on the vetran list? or was phillips just promoted to fill his spot for the 8 weeks

      Bolton would still be clogging our list as a vetran rather than on the LTI cos he retired.
      So only player we could elevate for would be possibly bradshaw, malceski etc if we thought were indefinite because we must have goodsey and someone else as vetrans
      Theres not much left to say

      Comment

      • ugg
        Can you feel it?
        Site Admin
        • Jan 2003
        • 15970

        #78
        I believe our two vets are Goodes and the other Bolton

        In Fosdike's case he retired at the start of the season. That might have something to do with his ineligibility for the LTI
        Reserves live updates (Twitter)
        Reserves WIKI -
        Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

        Comment

        • swansrule100
          The quarterback
          • May 2004
          • 4538

          #79
          Originally posted by ugg
          I believe our two vets are Goodes and the other Bolton

          In Fosdike's case he retired at the start of the season. That might have something to do with his ineligibility for the LTI
          yeah think your right so he was never technically on the LTI, should of just chucked him there, though only gives you 8 weeks doesnt it?
          Theres not much left to say

          Comment

          • ugg
            Can you feel it?
            Site Admin
            • Jan 2003
            • 15970

            #80
            I think 8 weeks is the minimum time needed on the list, not the maximum.
            Reserves live updates (Twitter)
            Reserves WIKI -
            Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

            Comment

            • Hartijon
              On the Rookie List
              • May 2008
              • 1536

              #81
              My Team to Thrash the Dogs

              FF: McGlynne Mumford TDL (awesome line!)
              HF ROK Goodes Bolton
              MF Parker Hanneberry Bird
              HB Shaw Grundy Kennelly
              FB Mattner Richards Smith

              Followers: Pyke Kennedy Mc Veigh

              I/C : Reid , Johnston(Its time!) ,LRT (ease him back in)

              SUB: Moore (pocket rocket can fire for a quarter)

              Emergency: Sumner,Jetta,Everitt,Seaby

              Comment

              • liz
                Veteran
                Site Admin
                • Jan 2003
                • 16770

                #82
                Originally posted by ugg
                I believe our two vets are Goodes and the other Bolton
                Pretty sure that one is nominated as an "inside vet" and one an "outside vet", giving us the ability to have 39 on the senior list. That does mean we are allowed one designated rookie but I think you have to designate them at the start of the year, not when you feel like it.

                But it is probably a moot point if we just want to promote one rookie as I am pretty sure Bolts qualifies as a LTI.

                All clubs are allowed to promote another rookie, without the LTI requirement, but that doesn't kick in until about halfway through the season.

                Comment

                • ugg
                  Can you feel it?
                  Site Admin
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 15970

                  #83
                  Originally posted by Hartijon
                  FF: McGlynne Mumford TDL (awesome line!)
                  HF ROK Goodes Bolton
                  MF Parker Hanneberry Bird
                  HB Shaw Grundy Kennelly
                  FB Mattner Richards Smith

                  Followers: Pyke Kennedy Mc Veigh

                  I/C : Reid , Johnston(Its time!) ,LRT (ease him back in)

                  SUB: Moore (pocket rocket can fire for a quarter)

                  Emergency: Sumner,Jetta,Everitt,Seaby
                  That's one incredibly tall bench you have there.
                  (All the better to mark the ball with, my dear)
                  Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                  Reserves WIKI -
                  Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                  Comment

                  • aardvark
                    Veterans List
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 5685

                    #84
                    Originally posted by Hartijon
                    FF: McGlynne Mumford TDL (awesome line!)
                    HF ROK Goodes Bolton
                    MF Parker Hanneberry Bird
                    HB Shaw Grundy Kennelly
                    FB Mattner Richards Smith

                    Followers: Pyke Kennedy Mc Veigh

                    I/C : Reid , Johnston(Its time!) ,LRT (ease him back in)

                    SUB: Moore (pocket rocket can fire for a quarter)

                    Emergency: Sumner,Jetta,Everitt,Seaby
                    I'm starting to like the idea of Mummy at FF. Could be the answer to all our problems. He's a good ruckman but could be a great FF. Plugger lives again.....

                    Comment

                    • Captain
                      Captain of the Side
                      • Feb 2004
                      • 3602

                      #85
                      In: Seaby, TDL, Meredith, Grundy, Rohan
                      Out: White, Jack, Everitt, Moore, Bird

                      Comment

                      • Bas
                        Veterans List
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 4457

                        #86
                        Originally posted by Captain
                        In: Seaby, TDL, Meredith, Grundy, Rohan
                        Out: White, Jack, Everitt, Moore, Bird
                        Rohan out for 3 weeks with injury.
                        In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

                        Comment

                        • Hartijon
                          On the Rookie List
                          • May 2008
                          • 1536

                          #87
                          Originally posted by aardvark
                          I'm starting to like the idea of Mummy at FF. Could be the answer to all our problems. He's a good ruckman but could be a great FF. Plugger lives again.....
                          Exactly! He would go right under the radar and be a major headache. Why would you sacrifice a top ruckman to make him a KPP??? Coz thats how you win matches! It enables us to get full value from having 3 good ruckmen. Tall on a dry day is good!

                          Comment

                          • jono2707
                            Goes up to 11
                            • Oct 2007
                            • 3326

                            #88
                            Originally posted by Hartijon
                            Exactly! He would go right under the radar and be a major headache. Why would you sacrifice a top ruckman to make him a KPP??? Coz thats how you win matches! It enables us to get full value from having 3 good ruckmen. Tall on a dry day is good!
                            Someone his size will never go under the radar....

                            Comment

                            • Wazza
                              Regular in the Side
                              • May 2004
                              • 805

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Scottee
                              Why would you sub Pyke off in the last quarter? He allowed Mumford to go forward and kick 2 goals and nearly get a 3rd against Carlton.
                              To allow Mummy to stay on the ball last qtr and bring on a fresh runner for the last, Pyke gave us nothing around the ground and we lacked an extra runner IMHO. Mummy can still go forward for 3/4 game I dont understand your point?. You want our best ruckman to sit in the fwd line in the last qtr?
                              The otherpoint i was trying to make was to give Jesse a full game at ff and not put him on the ball- ff is probably the hardest position to learn (given his basketball background)he needs time at ff not trying to play backup ruckman.

                              Cheers

                              Waz

                              Comment

                              • Kirkari
                                On the Rookie List
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 1036

                                #90
                                Reg, Seaby, Nipper for Bevo, Jack, Everitt.
                                Superman still wears Brett Kirk Pyjamas

                                Comment

                                Working...