Interchange fiasco

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nomae
    Regular in the Side
    • May 2006
    • 523

    #31
    Reading that Herald Sun article and the comments by the ferals reminded me of that North game last year - just out of curiosity, what were our collective thoughts on that? Did we get away with one?

    Ps. Rule is a joke, free kick yes, 50m no, it is way too harsh of a punishment.

    Pps. DROP JETTA

    Comment

    • BSA5
      Senior Player
      • Feb 2008
      • 2522

      #32
      Originally posted by nomae
      Reading that Herald Sun article and the comments by the ferals reminded me of that North game last year - just out of curiosity, what were our collective thoughts on that? Did we get away with one?
      A couple of important details about that match are lost when people talk about it. Firstly, the 19th man was White, and he didn't touch it. Jolly was the one who touched it. Jolly then left the field, being White's rather late replacement, but White was the 19th man, Jolly was the player who had the touch. White had no impact on the play at all, so those saying the 19th man impacted the play in those 30 seconds are completely wrong.

      Secondly, the Swans were robbed because Kirk had a snap shot which went through, but was called touched on the line despite being a good half a metre over. It was the last score of the game. The Swans should have won that game.
      Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

      Comment

      • ugg
        Can you feel it?
        Site Admin
        • Jan 2003
        • 15968

        #33
        The umpiring department are backing their man at the moment, and so they should. However, I have heard from one of the statsmen that the Swans in fact did have 5 on the interchange for about 20 seconds before the whole thing blew up.
        Reserves live updates (Twitter)
        Reserves WIKI -
        Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

        Comment

        • stellation
          scott names the planets
          • Sep 2003
          • 9718

          #34
          In Bay Hatley we're right behind the interchange bench, the Swans are correct. I assume that it all came down to the steward seeing Dan's stuttered entry to the ground as Goodesy ran off the field and assuming Dan was going on for Goodesy (as nobody had just come off that second for Dan to be replacing).
          I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
          We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

          Comment

          • Jesse Richards
            On the Rookie List
            • Mar 2010
            • 292

            #35
            The steward could have checked. But no, self-importantly pounced, as per instructions. FFS it's not rocket science. And not having those 6 points taken off the score is atrocious. Our percentage is so bad at present could it have an impact at the end of the season?

            Comment

            • stellation
              scott names the planets
              • Sep 2003
              • 9718

              #36
              Originally posted by Jesse Richards
              The steward could have checked. But no, self-importantly pounced, as per instructions. FFS it's not rocket science. And not having those 6 points taken off the score is atrocious. Our percentage is so bad at present could it have an impact at the end of the season?
              People make mistakes, but not checking when it's a dead ball situation anyway and an entire bench is pointing and saying "look! we have enough!" is what really gets me about it. If they can't overturn it once it's been called then that's a problem for the AFL to fix quickly, but if they can and the steward didn't even double check then that's pretty awful.
              I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
              We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

              Comment

              • Primmy
                Proud Tragic Swan
                • Apr 2008
                • 5970

                #37
                Stella they recalled a wrong decision out at ANZ last year against.....(not us).....and the game proceeded, so yes they can definitely cancel the call. Just a twit bignoting himself.
                If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                Comment

                • johnno
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 1102

                  #38
                  IF I was Longmire, and I knew at that moment in time that we had 5 on the bench(which I'm sure somebody MUST have radio-ed it to him!!!), I would have instructed a runner to deliver a message to either Goodes or McVeigh to run to the umpire and call for a count.

                  Surely this could have fixed things up?

                  Comment

                  • Chilcott
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 595

                    #39
                    Shocking decision by the steward and the Swans interchange bench.

                    It may have been only 20 seconds, but why would we have 17 men on the field at a very crtical time of the match.

                    Comment

                    • robamiee
                      Regular in the Side
                      • Sep 2005
                      • 688

                      #40
                      the AFL have just released that the decision was incorrect and rang the swans to apologise....(too f#@&$^ late)....
                      Critical time and critical decision. gave the blues more momentum...and they say momentum is everything

                      Comment

                      • GongSwan
                        Senior Player
                        • Jan 2009
                        • 1362

                        #41
                        Originally posted by dimelb
                        Yes, as distinct from being on the ground too soon!
                        I would have said, who notices him when he's on the ground? other than 2 or 3 touches a game
                        You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

                        Comment

                        • ScottH
                          It's Goodes to cheer!!
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 23665

                          #42
                          THE INTERCHANGE steward who incorrectly paid a free kick against the Sydney Swans during their loss to Carlton at the SCG on Friday night is expected to be stood down for a week.

                          Steward error - AFL.com.au


                          And we get an apology. How sweet.

                          Comment

                          • ScottH
                            It's Goodes to cheer!!
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 23665

                            #43
                            It is a simple solution.
                            The Sub works with a coloured vest.

                            Why not have 3 batons, similar to an athletic relay?
                            Each of the I/C players has a baton and cannot take to the ground whilst they are holding one.
                            As each player comes off, a baton is exchanged.

                            In the Fridays instance, Hanners would've had no baton, and would've been free to enter the field.

                            Comment

                            • Big Al
                              Veterans List
                              • Feb 2005
                              • 7007

                              #44
                              Originally posted by ScottH
                              It is a simple solution.
                              The Sub works with a coloured vest.

                              Why not have 3 batons, similar to an athletic relay?
                              Each of the I/C players has a baton and cannot take to the ground whilst they are holding one.
                              As each player comes off, a baton is exchanged.

                              In the Fridays instance, Hanners would've had no baton, and would've been free to enter the field.
                              Do we get penalised if say Jesse gets Interchanged and drops the baton or when Bevan comes off and hands the baton to the opposition.
                              ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                              Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                              Comment

                              • aardvark
                                Veterans List
                                • Mar 2010
                                • 5685

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Big Al
                                Do we get penalised if say Jesse gets Interchanged and drops the baton or when Bevan comes off and hands the baton to the opposition.
                                Don't we already get penalised any time either of them enter the ground ?

                                Comment

                                Working...