If Judd wasnt in the Carlton team friday night would they have won ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Auntie.Gerald
    Veterans List
    • Oct 2009
    • 6474

    If Judd wasnt in the Carlton team friday night would they have won ?

    For me I dont think they would have !

    So that made me think firstly Carlton spent a lot of coin on Chris but it was a great decision and worth every penny.

    It felt like against Geelong Chapman was the difference that sparked the final term and against Carlton Judd was the difference and on both occasion only in the final qtr

    So are we just one marque player short of other teams or two at least ?
    "be tough, only when it gets tough"

  • swansrule100
    The quarterback
    • May 2004
    • 4538

    #2
    yeh but you take say goodes out of our side then how would we go say against the eagles round 3. We lost end of story. I think judd was great but i think he has some mates flying under the radar.
    Theres not much left to say

    Comment

    • ScottH
      It's Goodes to cheer!!
      • Sep 2003
      • 23665

      #3
      Or Betts,

      Or if Jack hadn't rolled his ankle.

      Or if it had kept raining.

      yada yada yada

      Comment

      • goswannie14
        Leadership Group
        • Sep 2005
        • 11166

        #4
        Originally posted by ScottH
        Or Betts,

        Or if Jack hadn't rolled his ankle.

        Or if it had kept raining.

        yada yada yada
        Or if the interchange stupid had half a brain.
        Does God believe in Atheists?

        Comment

        • Big Al
          Veterans List
          • Feb 2005
          • 7007

          #5
          Or if Mum had a headache 42 years ago I may not have cared who won...
          ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

          Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

          Comment

          • BSA5
            Senior Player
            • Feb 2008
            • 2522

            #6
            Honestly, no. Judd won that game for them. However, he was in the side, and we couldn't negate his influence, so it doesn't really matter.
            Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

            Comment

            • Nich
              Senior Player
              • May 2010
              • 1291

              #7
              Originally posted by big al
              or if mum had a headache 42 years ago i may not have cared who won...
              :d

              Comment

              • CJK
                Human
                • Apr 2006
                • 2170

                #8
                He was bloody good. Let's get him in our team.
                -

                Comment

                • msb
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 827

                  #9
                  Yes we would of won IMO. What judd does for carlton is just unbelievable, when he gets that vital handball or kick that results in a goal (ie forward pocket the other night when the ball should of gone out of bounds) or crucial passage of play and the blues players then lift from that. It was the same against the crows last week, he won that game for carlton against them as well, they would be nowhere without judd.

                  Comment

                  • Mountain Man
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 907

                    #10
                    If Bevan was in their team............... would they have won?

                    Comment

                    • goswannie14
                      Leadership Group
                      • Sep 2005
                      • 11166

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Mountain Man
                      If Bevan was in their team............... would they have won?
                      Well.....we would have had one more goal because he would have given us one, they would have had one less goal from his stuff up and the interchange stupids decision would be overturned and we would have won!!!
                      Does God believe in Atheists?

                      Comment

                      • GongSwan
                        Senior Player
                        • Jan 2009
                        • 1362

                        #12
                        Without Judd they would look pretty ordinary, what he did in the final term was unbelievable, but considering Jack had him under control til he turned his ankle, and someone let Betts off the chain, I don't know, we had a few passengers in that game, but overall, I'd say no, without Judd, we probably win
                        You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

                        Comment

                        • robamiee
                          Regular in the Side
                          • Sep 2005
                          • 688

                          #13
                          def without Judd..but you can say that about any team....Without Jack would we have been ahead for so long.....Jack is i believe one of only a couple of players in the comp that can hold Judd..why because not only does KJ have that burst of speed, but he also makes Judd accountable with his attacking abilities as well....Once you make Judd accountable you have won as it takes his focus away from his strengths....you need to have a tagger come attacking midfielder on Judd...
                          Just shows how far KJ has come and i think if he gets more media focus he can win a brownlow for the swans....

                          Comment

                          • Auntie.Gerald
                            Veterans List
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 6474

                            #14
                            Originally posted by robamiee
                            def without Judd..but you can say that about any team....Without Jack would we have been ahead for so long.....Jack is i believe one of only a couple of players in the comp that can hold Judd..why because not only does KJ have that burst of speed, but he also makes Judd accountable with his attacking abilities as well....Once you make Judd accountable you have won as it takes his focus away from his strengths....you need to have a tagger come attacking midfielder on Judd...
                            Just shows how far KJ has come and i think if he gets more media focus he can win a brownlow for the swans....
                            Rob that is exactly what I am alluding too.............we are one or two marque players short right now...........i have had a reality check !
                            "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                            Comment

                            • Doctor
                              Bay 29
                              • Sep 2003
                              • 2757

                              #15
                              I think the more pertinent question is "would Judd have had the impact he did had Jack not left the ground"? Had that impact not happened, Carlton wouldn't have won whether or not the interchange thing happened.

                              Quick grammar lesson too people (to some not all). It's "could HAVE" not "could OF". Just because people pronounce it as "of" doesn't mean you spell it that way. Please note, I mean this with respect and not to pick on anyone in particular, but it has been annoying me for a hell of a long time - on this site and everywhere else to be honest.
                              Today's a draft of your epitaph

                              Comment

                              Working...