Aside from the fact we're undisicplined and can't kick for @@@@...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mocaholic
    Regular in the Side
    • Oct 2003
    • 575

    Aside from the fact we're undisicplined and can't kick for @@@@...

    Does it bother anybody else that we haven't moved into footy played this decade?

    1st qr down, and i can't recall one play-on from a mark. Riewoldt slips over going for a grab leaving Teddy to mark uncontested, miles from anybody else. So what does he do - what Geelong, Collingwood, Essendon, Carlton, Hawthorn - even (ffs) Richmond do, and play on?

    No.

    He stops.

    Props.

    Goes back behind the mark, which is currently guarded by Riewoldt 5m behind him.

    He looks each way for a couple of options.

    He can't find anybody open (surprise surprise).

    He kicks to a contest.



    So does it frustrate anybody else? Or is it just me?
    Insert Your Life [HERE]
  • DeadlyAkkuret
    Veterans List
    • Oct 2006
    • 4547

    #2
    We're stuck in 2007, it's embarrassing.

    Comment

    • kangle4
      Warming the Bench
      • May 2003
      • 200

      #3
      Were all feeling the pain, along with anyone sitting near me while I watch this.

      Comment

      • lwjoyner
        Regular in the Side
        • Nov 2004
        • 952

        #4
        Yes it does, the swans dont understand the game. Everything is kick it to a contest or to the oppostion yet we cant man up how many times is a st player alone. I am not sure what the coaching staff is teaching them.

        Comment

        • BSA5
          Senior Player
          • Feb 2008
          • 2522

          #5
          Lol at this thread. We played on from marks at every opportunity at which there was an option to go to.
          Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

          Comment

          • SimonH
            Salt future's rising
            • Aug 2004
            • 1647

            #6
            You would hope that most people had learnt by now, not to post general observations about the team or club as a whole, arising from part of one match, while that match is still in progress.

            If I had owned a smartphone (were they even around?), and I had ignored the above rule, I certainly would have posted some pretty regrettable stuff during the 2nd and 3rd quarters of the 2005 semi-final.

            Comment

            • DeadlyAkkuret
              Veterans List
              • Oct 2006
              • 4547

              #7
              I don't see how the final result makes a difference. We played old school footy on numerous occasions yesterday.

              Comment

              • AnnieH
                RWOs Black Sheep
                • Aug 2006
                • 11332

                #8
                I can't believe we chucked a collingwood and won from behinds!!
                I'd be happy if Horse held a special clinic this week teaching the difference between behinds and goals. Surely he'd know a thing or two about it.
                Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                Comment

                • Nich
                  Senior Player
                  • May 2010
                  • 1291

                  #9
                  I'm still blaming the Coke- Zero In commercial. Fancy encouraging a bunch of players to hit the posts on purpose. They probably picked the Swans on purpose because they knew we were so good at it.

                  Comment

                  • BSA5
                    Senior Player
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 2522

                    #10
                    Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
                    I don't see how the final result makes a difference. We played old school footy on numerous occasions yesterday.
                    Yeah, and we did it well. Whenever there was an option, we played on. Whenever there wasn't, we stopped and either waited for a target or went to a contest that was weighted in our favour. On a couple of occasions the players got it wrong, but you can't expect any team to get it right 100% of the time.

                    Point is, there's nothing wrong with taking your time when there's little on offer, so long as you go quickly when you can. That's what we did, that's modern footy, and we smashed St.Kilda all over the park.
                    Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

                    Comment

                    • Hartijon
                      On the Rookie List
                      • May 2008
                      • 1536

                      #11
                      Originally posted by lwjoyner
                      Yes it does, the swans dont understand the game. Everything is kick it to a contest or to the oppostion yet we cant man up how many times is a st player alone. I am not sure what the coaching staff is teaching them.
                      Its teaching them to create a stoppage when we dominate in ruck(Mummy) Kick to a contest,manup so nobody breaks free and get a ball up then win the ball from there. Obviously a great tactic coz we won! When we played on and ran with handball we did not look like the Swans at all! Usually someone kicked a point at the end of this play to restore the faith of the old believers.Keeping the opposition hopeful till the end was the reason for that tactic so victory tastes better.

                      Comment

                      • DeadlyAkkuret
                        Veterans List
                        • Oct 2006
                        • 4547

                        #12
                        Originally posted by BSA5
                        Yeah, and we did it well. Whenever there was an option, we played on. Whenever there wasn't, we stopped and either waited for a target or went to a contest that was weighted in our favour. On a couple of occasions the players got it wrong, but you can't expect any team to get it right 100% of the time.

                        Point is, there's nothing wrong with taking your time when there's little on offer, so long as you go quickly when you can. That's what we did, that's modern footy, and we smashed St.Kilda all over the park.
                        You're simplifying it too much.

                        There's a reason we're struggling at the bottom of the 8, and it's not down to inaccuracy.

                        Comment

                        • dimelb
                          pr. dim-melb; m not f
                          • Jun 2003
                          • 6889

                          #13
                          Originally posted by BSA5
                          Yeah, and we did it well. Whenever there was an option, we played on. Whenever there wasn't, we stopped and either waited for a target or went to a contest that was weighted in our favour. On a couple of occasions the players got it wrong, but you can't expect any team to get it right 100% of the time.

                          Point is, there's nothing wrong with taking your time when there's little on offer, so long as you go quickly when you can. That's what we did, that's modern footy, and we smashed St.Kilda all over the park.
                          Also know as tempo footy. And when we bring our intensity, we're very good at it.
                          He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                          Comment

                          • Wardy
                            The old Boiler!
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 6676

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Nich
                            I'm still blaming the Coke- Zero In commercial. Fancy encouraging a bunch of players to hit the posts on purpose. They probably picked the Swans on purpose because they knew we were so good at it.
                            Agree that is still giving me heartburn as well - I want them to ALL practice goal kicking this week, BETWEEN THE BIG STICKS!!! set shots, on the run, from acute angles - I really dont care how long it takes - just bloody well do it Longmire and the coaching staff - we should have won by 50 yesterday. I was joking with Ange (yes Aussie Ange was back) during the game that I reckon we will get 37 behinds - I was only 14 off!!!
                            I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
                            Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
                            AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

                            Comment

                            • mocaholic
                              Regular in the Side
                              • Oct 2003
                              • 575

                              #15
                              Obviously hindsight is 20/20 but after the first quarter we did start playing on when we could, took some risks and despite some sloppy disposal (ill-disciplined, indiscriminate kicking into the 50 - Mal, I'm looking at YOU) the intensity was right up.

                              Generally given the type of game now played with the pressing up, opportunities to run and go following a turnover are critical to scoring. When we were doing it, we looked very good. When we stopped and propped, it meant the Saints could get back to cover the forwards.

                              Balance of the side looked good although - as may've been mentioned elsewhere - a crumber would be very, very handy.
                              Insert Your Life [HERE]

                              Comment

                              Working...