Sydney Score Equality funds.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ScottH
    It's Goodes to cheer!!
    • Sep 2003
    • 23665

    Sydney Score Equality funds.

    $7.2 mill over the next 5 years.

  • DeadlyAkkuret
    Veterans List
    • Oct 2006
    • 4547

    #2
    Let's recruit Franklin and Pendlebury and employ them as "Co-Managers of Equality Funds"

    Comment

    • wolftone57
      Veterans List
      • Aug 2008
      • 5857

      #3
      Originally posted by ScottH
      $7.2 mill over the next 5 years.


      AFL addresses inequality - AFL.com.au
      Did you notice who got the most? The Kangas & Bullies got 10.2 mill each. Two clubs that have proven over the years that they can't stand alone. I feel sorry for the Bullies but not the Kangas as they have been offered everything on the planet & turned it down. The sooner these clubs merge the better off the AFL & footy public will be. Melb, St Kilda & Richmond are next! The Saints make the GF two years running & are still in trouble, it makes me wonder what financial genious is running that club! the other twoo need to merge too, imagine the strip, blood red, blue, black & yellow oh @@@@! they are the Crows!!

      Comment

      • Kanga
        On the Rookie List
        • Aug 2007
        • 274

        #4
        Originally posted by wolftone57
        Did you notice who got the most? The Kangas & Bullies got 10.2 mill each. Two clubs that have proven over the years that they can't stand alone. I feel sorry for the Bullies but not the Kangas as they have been offered everything on the planet & turned it down. The sooner these clubs merge the better off the AFL & footy public will be. Melb, St Kilda & Richmond are next! The Saints make the GF two years running & are still in trouble, it makes me wonder what financial genious is running that club! the other twoo need to merge too, imagine the strip, blood red, blue, black & yellow oh @@@@! they are the Crows!!
        Don't let the facts get in the way of your story mate. Perhaps if your home games were paying off Etihad you may have a different view. More informed minds than those that appear in these forums have determined the compensation and how it has been arrived at. And it isn't as if Sydney has not been a beneficiary of the AFL's largesse before. Good luck next season.
        Last edited by goswannie14; 27 September 2011, 08:24 PM. Reason: fixed quote

        Comment

        • msb
          On the Rookie List
          • Mar 2006
          • 827

          #5
          Originally posted by wolftone57
          Did you notice who got the most? The Kangas & Bullies got 10.2 mill each. Two clubs that have proven over the years that they can't stand alone. I feel sorry for the Bullies but not the Kangas as they have been offered everything on the planet & turned it down. The sooner these clubs merge the better off the AFL & footy public will be. Melb, St Kilda & Richmond are next! The Saints make the GF two years running & are still in trouble, it makes me wonder what financial genious is running that club! the other twoo need to merge too, imagine the strip, blood red, blue, black & yellow oh @@@@! they are the Crows!!
          Agree, get rid of the kangas IMO or send them down to hobart, they are such an irrelevant, no one gives a @@@@ about team....if they went down to tassie they may actually get a decent supporter base and also have more than 15,000 turning up to their games each week. Why they never went to the gold coast just baffles me.

          Comment

          • AnnieH
            RWOs Black Sheep
            • Aug 2006
            • 11332

            #6
            Originally posted by Kanga
            Originally posted by wolftone57
            Did you notice who got the most? The Kangas & Bullies got 10.2 mill each. Two clubs that have proven over the years that they can't stand alone. I feel sorry for the Bullies but not the Kangas as they have been offered everything on the planet & turned it down. The sooner these clubs merge the better off the AFL & footy public will be. Melb, St Kilda & Richmond are next! The Saints make the GF two years running & are still in trouble, it makes me wonder what financial genious is running that club! the other twoo need to merge too, imagine the strip, blood red, blue, black & yellow oh @@@@! they are the Crows!!
            Don't let the facts get in the way of your story mate. Perhaps if your home games were paying off Etihad you may have a different view. More informed minds than those that appear in these forums have determined the compensation and how it has been arrived at. And it isn't as if Sydney has not been a beneficiary of the AFL's largesse before. Good luck next season.
            Do you get many Boo-a-Roo supporters at your home games these days?
            Last edited by goswannie14; 27 September 2011, 08:25 PM. Reason: fixed quote
            Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
            Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

            Comment

            • Untamed Snark
              Senior Player
              • Feb 2011
              • 1375

              #7
              The Tasmanians deserve their own team-a real one, not some cast of scrap that couldn't pull a crowd if they paid them.
              It's quite fair to suggest sending the Roos to them
              Chillin' with the strange Quarks

              Comment

              • longmile
                Crumber
                • Apr 2011
                • 3367

                #8
                18 teams is too many.
                Have to scrap the Kangas and another Melbourne based club, Bulldogs or Carlton perhaps?

                Comment

                • Lucky Knickers
                  Fandom of Fabulousness
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 4220

                  #9
                  I think that's good at goes someway to provided clubs with the ability to fund their football department and other off-field activities/staff.
                  Happy to see Sydney with a good slice.

                  Comment

                  • ScottH
                    It's Goodes to cheer!!
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 23665

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Lucky Knickers
                    I think that's good at goes someway to provided clubs with the ability to fund their football department and other off-field activities/staff.
                    Happy to see Sydney with a good slice.
                    Is Arizona big enough for 18 teams?

                    Comment

                    • goswannie14
                      Leadership Group
                      • Sep 2005
                      • 11166

                      #11
                      Originally posted by msb
                      Agree, get rid of the kangas IMO or send them down to hobart, they are such an irrelevant, no one gives a @@@@ about team....if they went down to tassie they may actually get a decent supporter base and also have more than 15,000 turning up to their games each week. Why they never went to the gold coast just baffles me.
                      My Brother in law barracks for the Roos and is good friends with a number of the players. The reason they said no to GC was because they had no facilities or a stadium when they were asked about going there.
                      Does God believe in Atheists?

                      Comment

                      • jono2707
                        Goes up to 11
                        • Oct 2007
                        • 3326

                        #12
                        Originally posted by longmile
                        18 teams is too many.
                        Have to scrap the Kangas and another Melbourne based club, Bulldogs or Carlton perhaps?
                        What about scrapping a team with a minuscule supporter base in an area where there is too much competition, very few juniors and will need to be propped up by the AFL for apparently the next 20 years. GWS?????

                        Comment

                        • Damien
                          Living in 2005
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 3713

                          #13
                          Originally posted by goswannie14
                          My Brother in law barracks for the Roos and is good friends with a number of the players. The reason they said no to GC was because they had no facilities or a stadium when they were asked about going there.
                          They were promised a stadium though, as well as something like 100 million over a number of years.

                          They need to make something work over the next 5 years. The AFL have no reason to prop them up forever, they were so successful for so long over two eras in the 70s and 90s and still struggle for support. I think their Hobart move is pretty smart, has the biggest population in Tasmania and could maybe get something going there similiar to Hawthorn in Launceston, but the reality is they have to drive growth in Melbourne for them to survive there. Can't see it happening.

                          Comment

                          • Kanga
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Aug 2007
                            • 274

                            #14
                            Originally posted by AnnieH
                            Do you get many Boo-a-Roo supporters at your home games these days?
                            Yes that was a very mature campaign wasn't it!

                            Comment

                            • AnnieH
                              RWOs Black Sheep
                              • Aug 2006
                              • 11332

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Kanga
                              Yes that was a very mature campaign wasn't it!
                              Mature, and obviously successful.
                              I think one of our better marketing campaigns.
                              Last edited by AnnieH; 28 September 2011, 10:28 AM.
                              Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                              Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                              Comment

                              Working...