1 year from now

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chilcott
    Regular in the Side
    • Jan 2008
    • 595

    1 year from now

    Bored at work and not much to read on RWO, so thought I'd put a side togther for 2013 based on our current list.

    Although 2012 will be a great year, I believe 2013 could be even better, taking into account player development.

    (2013 age in brackets)

    B - Smith (24), Richards (29), Johnson (20)
    HB - Armstrong (23), Grundy (26), J McVeigh (27)
    C - Rohan (19), Hanners (21), L Jetta (23)
    HF - Goodes (32), Reid (20),B McGlynn (27)
    F - Lamb (20), Walsh (24), Morton (25)
    R - Mumford (26), Kennedy (24), Jack (25)
    INT from- T Mitchell (19), L Parker (20), White (24), Shaw (31), O'Keeffe (32), Pyke (28), Sphangher (25), Bird (23), TDL (24), Gordon (22)

    Omitted from team due to age or competition for spots - J Bolton (32), M Mattner (30), Nick Mal (28), LRT (29), Seaby (28), Everitt (23).

    Include trades/draftees over the next few years, things are looking very good.

    Based on the age of players (and if all things go to plan, such as the re-signing of Reid) we could be in for a period of sustained success (top 4).

    Apologies if I left off any players.

    Don't know why I have done this - probably a waste of my time and yours, but had fun doing it.
  • Chilcott
    Regular in the Side
    • Jan 2008
    • 595

    #2
    Some players ages may be marginally out.

    Comment

    • Jewels
      On the Rookie List
      • Oct 2006
      • 3258

      #3
      We'll be premiers!!

      A girl can dream can't she??????

      Comment

      • swans_premiers
        On the Rookie List
        • Feb 2003
        • 1101

        #4
        Someone should invent a time machine so we can go forward 4 months from now.


        Off season is boring as bat @@@@
        Adam Goodes: Rising Star 99, Brownlow 2003, 2006
        Swans Premiers 1909, 1918,1933,2005, 2012

        Comment

        • kangle4
          Warming the Bench
          • May 2003
          • 200

          #5
          I would like to think Malceski will be back to his best and not gone.

          Comment

          • Auntie.Gerald
            Veterans List
            • Oct 2009
            • 6477

            #6
            gone baby gone
            "be tough, only when it gets tough"

            Comment

            • wolftone57
              Veterans List
              • Aug 2008
              • 5856

              #7
              I think Ryano & Shawie would have chucked it in by 2013. Probably end of next year. It doesn't get any easier as you get over thirty. Macca will not play permanent back flank he is probably not strong enough. Mitchell will play in 2012 & it wouldn't surprise me if he plays most of the season. Walsh wasn't brought here to bench sit so I think he will play all year if he is up to it. Fantastic tall forwardline & so many options at the back with our tall timber. Dunno if Mitch Morton will be a walk up start he has to get through 2012 first. Our mid is going to be sensational with Parker, Mitchell, Joey, Lamb chop, Bennie, Hannas Jack, Rohan, Goodes and Ryano WOWWWWW!!!!

              Comment

              • Bloody Hell
                Senior Player
                • Oct 2006
                • 3085

                #8
                I think Everitt has had his shot and is depth only now. Too many have gone past him, and can't really see a role for him in the 1's.
                The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

                Comment

                • SPC
                  Pushing for Selection
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 95

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Chilcott
                  Bored at work and not much to read on RWO, so thought I'd put a side togther for 2013 based on our current list.

                  Although 2012 will be a great year, I believe 2013 could be even better, taking into account player development.

                  (2013 age in brackets)

                  B - Smith (24), Richards (29), Johnson (20)
                  HB - Armstrong (23), Grundy (26), J McVeigh (27)
                  C - Rohan (19), Hanners (21), L Jetta (23)
                  HF - Goodes (32), Reid (20),B McGlynn (27)
                  F - Lamb (20), Walsh (24), Morton (25)
                  R - Mumford (26), Kennedy (24), Jack (25)
                  INT from- T Mitchell (19), L Parker (20), White (24), Shaw (31), O'Keeffe (32), Pyke (28), Sphangher (25), Bird (23), TDL (24), Gordon (22)

                  Omitted from team due to age or competition for spots - J Bolton (32), M Mattner (30), Nick Mal (28), LRT (29), Seaby (28), Everitt (23).

                  Include trades/draftees over the next few years, things are looking very good.

                  Based on the age of players (and if all things go to plan, such as the re-signing of Reid) we could be in for a period of sustained success (top 4).

                  Apologies if I left off any players.

                  Don't know why I have done this - probably a waste of my time and yours, but had fun doing it.
                  The good thing is, there are suddenly a lot more options (especially midfield, wing & attack) to play with given the inclusion of Mitchell, Morton, Walsh & Armstrong. I am looking more at 2012 and would have a few changes in that I cant have McVeigh in the back line - too many mistakes, but would be good value in the forward line, along with ROK & Bolton to allow the young guns to get stuck into the midfield.

                  B - Smith (23), Richards (28), Johnson (19)
                  HB - Armstrong (22), M Mattner (29), Shaw (30)

                  C - Rohan (18), Goodes (31), Hanners (20)
                  R - Mumford (25), Kennedy (23), Jack (24)

                  HF - J Bolton (31), Reid (19), J McVeigh (26)
                  F - White (23), Walsh (23), O'Keeffe (31)

                  Int & Midfield Rotation from - B McGlynn (26), Lamb (19), Morton (24), T Mitchell (18), L Parker (19), Pyke (27), Sphangher (24), Bird (22), TDL (23), Gordon (21), L Jetta (22), Grundy (25), Nick Mal (27), LRT (28), Seaby (27), Everitt (22).

                  Looking at the bench, I think we need to take a leaf out of Geelong's book this year and rotate players thru the team, especially the midfield to try and keep them fresh for the end of the season.

                  Comment

                  • dimelb
                    pr. dim-melb; m not f
                    • Jun 2003
                    • 6889

                    #10
                    Originally posted by SPC
                    The good thing is, there are suddenly a lot more options (especially midfield, wing & attack) to play with given the inclusion of Mitchell, Morton, Walsh & Armstrong. I am looking more at 2012 and would have a few changes in that I cant have McVeigh in the back line - too many mistakes, but would be good value in the forward line, along with ROK & Bolton to allow the young guns to get stuck into the midfield.

                    B - Smith (23), Richards (28), Johnson (19)
                    HB - Armstrong (22), M Mattner (29), Shaw (30)

                    C - Rohan (18), Goodes (31), Hanners (20)
                    R - Mumford (25), Kennedy (23), Jack (24)

                    HF - J Bolton (31), Reid (19), J McVeigh (26)
                    F - White (23), Walsh (23), O'Keeffe (31)

                    Int & Midfield Rotation from - B McGlynn (26), Lamb (19), Morton (24), T Mitchell (18), L Parker (19), Pyke (27), Sphangher (24), Bird (22), TDL (23), Gordon (21), L Jetta (22), Grundy (25), Nick Mal (27), LRT (28), Seaby (27), Everitt (22).

                    Looking at the bench, I think we need to take a leaf out of Geelong's book this year and rotate players thru the team, especially the midfield to try and keep them fresh for the end of the season.
                    That has the potential to be a great line-up, though I can't see Marty M getting a gig at CHB in front of LRT and Reg. But what a competition there is going to be for a spot in the firsts!
                    And I agree with copying Geelong's rotation strategy. I would add copying three of the top 4 teams this year and playing two ruckmen; in the long season it's a plus, not a minus, and the P/T ruck just doesn't work as well.
                    He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                    Comment

                    • SPC
                      Pushing for Selection
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 95

                      #11
                      Originally posted by dimelb
                      That has the potential to be a great line-up, though I can't see Marty M getting a gig at CHB in front of LRT and Reg. But what a competition there is going to be for a spot in the firsts!
                      And I agree with copying Geelong's rotation strategy. I would add copying three of the top 4 teams this year and playing two ruckmen; in the long season it's a plus, not a minus, and the P/T ruck just doesn't work as well.
                      Your probably right about CHB - I tossed Mattner, LRT & Reg around for the last position in the back 6 as they all have good and bad points, but hopefully one of them will do the job or get rotated depending on form.
                      With the 2 ruckmen option, would you drop White out of the foward line and play Seaby or Pyke in his position?

                      Comment

                      • dimelb
                        pr. dim-melb; m not f
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 6889

                        #12
                        Originally posted by SPC
                        Your probably right about CHB - I tossed Mattner, LRT & Reg around for the last position in the back 6 as they all have good and bad points, but hopefully one of them will do the job or get rotated depending on form.
                        With the 2 ruckmen option, would you drop White out of the foward line and play Seaby or Pyke in his position?
                        Pyke to the bench, rotate with Mummy through bench and "resting" forward, keep White and occasionally rotate him through the centre to reinforce our mids and keep the opposition on their toes.
                        He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                        Comment

                        • swans_premiers
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 1101

                          #13
                          Grundy was in great form before his injury this year
                          Adam Goodes: Rising Star 99, Brownlow 2003, 2006
                          Swans Premiers 1909, 1918,1933,2005, 2012

                          Comment

                          • Chilcott
                            Regular in the Side
                            • Jan 2008
                            • 595

                            #14
                            Originally posted by dimelb
                            Pyke to the bench, rotate with Mummy through bench and "resting" forward, keep White and occasionally rotate him through the centre to reinforce our mids and keep the opposition on their toes.
                            If Pyke has a big pre-season and is used as the second ruck, he will need to play more game time in the forward line. You couldn't rotate him solely off the bench, as that would only leave 2 interchange players to rotate through the midfield, which is not enough.

                            It's either Pyke or White as the forward/back-up ruckman. I can't see how you could play both.

                            I hope Jessie proves me wrong and we can use him more as a permanent forward, instead of second ruck.

                            Comment

                            • ernie koala
                              Senior Player
                              • May 2007
                              • 3251

                              #15
                              Armstrong couldn't even make the Crows best 22 most weeks.
                              What makes so many on here assume he'll be in our best 22?
                              Same goes for Morton and Walsh.
                              At this stage these guys add depth, and have plenty to prove before getting a gig in the 1's.
                              Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                              Comment

                              Working...