Punters back Swans to fail

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CJK
    Human
    • Apr 2006
    • 2170

    #16
    Don't forget the inquiry that was launched, which then went nowhere and was never discussed of again.
    -

    Comment

    • swantastic
      Veterans List
      • Jan 2006
      • 7275

      #17
      Originally posted by swansrob
      I can't wait for the year the top 8 is made up of Swans, GWS, WCE, Freo, Adelaide, Port, Brisbane and GC!
      ru for real....NEVA EVA want to see WC,Port,Crows,GWS,FREO OR GC in the eight EVA AGAIN.....happy to see the Swans and Brisse tho
      Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

      Comment

      • 707
        Veterans List
        • Aug 2009
        • 6204

        #18
        Originally posted by CJK
        Don't forget the inquiry that was launched, which then went nowhere and was never discussed of again.
        Yes, that was a classic. The AFL commission a report on why the interstate teams were filling the top spots. Did they ever do that when Victorian teams were filling the top spots?

        Never heard the outcome of the report. Probably suggested less interstate travel for the big Melbourne teams as a solution!

        Comment

        • wolftone57
          Veterans List
          • Aug 2008
          • 5857

          #19
          Originally posted by swantastic
          ru for real....NEVA EVA want to see WC,Port,Crows,GWS,FREO OR GC in the eight EVA AGAIN.....happy to see the Swans and Brisse tho
          R U from Melbourne or something? I would rather have that lot than any Vic Side. Let's face it they have been propping up the Vic sides ever since the AFL was formed. I know we have had plenty of help but we are in a hostile market trying to convert it to AFL. But sides like the Doggies, Tigers, Demons, Kangas & Saints have no excuse.
          Last edited by wolftone57; 11 January 2012, 10:40 PM.

          Comment

          Working...