We owe the tigers a belting.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gumby_bolts
    Warming the Bench
    • Jul 2006
    • 255

    #31
    Originally posted by ugg
    A lot of commentators and pundits like to use the clearances stats to show what a great contested ball side we are but the main reason we are always high in that stat over the Roos-Longmire era is that we attend the most ruck contests of any side in the league. If you rank the league on the clearances percentage rate, (clearances / ruck contests) you'll find we're just slightly better than average.

    There is a similar degree of verisimilitude with the tackles stat too - we're high up there but we also average the highest tackles against (1st or 2nd) in the league too. It's just a reflection of the contested style of football we play. A more relevant stat would be tackle completion rate but I don't think the public has access to that stat.

    Unfortunately I can't poke any holes in the MCG stat
    Fine, I'll go back to being worried about this game.

    Comment

    • Matimbo
      Warming the Bench
      • Apr 2009
      • 334

      #32
      Originally posted by ugg
      There is a similar degree of verisimilitude with the tackles stat too
      So I had to look up "verisimilitude" on dictionary.com since the most complicated words starting with V that I know are Velour (noun: a soft, smooth fabric) and Vacuum (noun: As in vacuum cleaner ... something I get nagged about not using). For those like me, it apparently means something having the appearance of the truth ... e.g. most words said by politicians, most words posted on R&WOnline, etc.

      I'm in the glass-half-full camp for the Tigers game. We lost against the Crows in a game where they were able to match us in the hard midfield stuff plus beat us in the forward line conversion (we had a clear win in inside 50s). Yet we only just lost. I don't see Tigers being able to match us in the midfield and I think our backline will hold the Tigers forwards OK. Despite our lack of a true forward set up, we are averaging about 100 points per game scored and I think that will be enough to win. Tigers have only cracked 100 point once this year (against Demons). All their other games were mostly under 90 points scored. Even the win against Port they only scored 91 (13:13). Riewalt did kick 4, so negating him will be critical. But I expect we will do this by starving his supply from the midfield.
      CIA Agent to Policeman: "Have you ever had anti-terrorist training?"
      Policeman: "Yes, I was married once."

      Comment

      • snajik
        Senior Player
        • Jan 2003
        • 1115

        #33
        Originally posted by goswannie14
        Pyke had kicked his first goal and that was about teh last one that we got. Kirk showed he had slowed down when he was easily run around for the Tigers to kick the sealer. It was a disappointing day.
        Like a dog with a bone
        It's very hard to live in a studio apartment in San Jose with a man who's learning to play violin. That's what she told the police when she handed them the empty revolver.
        The Scarlatti Tilt - Richard Brautigan

        Comment

        • ugg
          Can you feel it?
          Site Admin
          • Jan 2003
          • 15971

          #34
          Opening market has the Tigers 1.85 favourites, Swans 1.95.

          Situation restored, we're the nobody-rates-us underdogs again.
          Reserves live updates (Twitter)
          Reserves WIKI -
          Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

          Comment

          • erica
            Happy and I know it
            • Jan 2008
            • 1247

            #35
            Originally posted by ugg
            Opening market has the Tigers 1.85 favourites, Swans 1.95.

            Situation restored, we're the nobody-rates-us underdogs again.
            Strangely, that makes me feel better.
            All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke

            Comment

            • GongSwan
              Senior Player
              • Jan 2009
              • 1362

              #36
              Originally posted by erica
              Strangely, that makes me feel better.
              Yes
              You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

              Comment

              • Triple B
                Formerly 'BBB'
                • Feb 2003
                • 6999

                #37
                Originally posted by ugg
                Opening market has the Tigers 1.85 favourites, Swans 1.95.

                Situation restored, we're the nobody-rates-us underdogs again.
                That is SERIOUSLY good odds for Sydney. They are obviously swayed by the no Goodes factor, but still silly all the same.

                Sydney are continually good value away from home and equally ridiculously short odds at home, v Adelaide being a great example with the Crows starting in excess of $4, just stupid.
                Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                Comment

                • aardvark
                  Veterans List
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 5685

                  #38
                  Said on SEN this arvo we have won 8 outta our last 10 v the tiges. $1.95 is looking very good IMO.

                  Comment

                  • sfan
                    Warming the Bench
                    • May 2003
                    • 487

                    #39
                    Tiggers usually deal with us easily at the MCG. Hope this week is not the case. Remember last year we got belted.

                    Comment

                    • Jewels
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 3258

                      #40
                      Originally posted by ernie koala
                      We only just lost an excellent contested game against the Crows.
                      Hats off to the Crows, they played some great footy..... but so did we....
                      I predict, if we play with the same intensity and pressure as yesterday, we'll comfortably account for the Tigers.
                      Yep

                      Originally posted by sfan
                      Tiggers usually deal with us easily at the MCG. Hope this week is not the case. Remember last year we got belted.
                      The Tigers are certainly a better team this year, but we are a far better team then last year.
                      I think the Tiges will pay a huge price for our loss last week much like Saints paid the price for what we did to the Hawks last week.

                      Comment

                      Working...