I love this thread: it contains more opinion, information, misinformation, disinformation, re-writing of history and outright bulldust than any other I've seen; pretty much the perfect forum!
One fact that seems to have been overlooked or ignored is that the Swans did not make a bad decision in extending Tippett's contract in 2016; they had no choice. The extension was performance-based and dependent upon the conditions in the original 4 year contract. The performance that triggered the extension was the 2015 season; Tippett was one of the best players in the AFL in 2015. Based on that form, the Swans were pleased that he wanted to extend. They subsequently renegotiated the contract to ameliorate the impact on the salary cap, but there was never any possibility of reducing the total dollars involved.
I was never a big Tippett fan, but I did recognise that he was delivering what he promised. He was recruited because the Swans recognised that we couldn't waste Goodes' talents by playing him as a permanent full-forward. Tippett promised a strong-marking 40 goal-a-season forward, and we were happy to pay big bucks for that. And, until the injuries wore him down, that's exactly what he delivered. The Swans' Tippett turned out to be very similar to the Crows' Tippett - surprise, surprise!
Tippett's biggest problem was that he always tried to do more than that, crashing packs, laying tackles, and making second and third efforts. And that's when he got injured, and sometimes stupidly played with injuries, which ultimately ruined his career.
One fact that seems to have been overlooked or ignored is that the Swans did not make a bad decision in extending Tippett's contract in 2016; they had no choice. The extension was performance-based and dependent upon the conditions in the original 4 year contract. The performance that triggered the extension was the 2015 season; Tippett was one of the best players in the AFL in 2015. Based on that form, the Swans were pleased that he wanted to extend. They subsequently renegotiated the contract to ameliorate the impact on the salary cap, but there was never any possibility of reducing the total dollars involved.
I was never a big Tippett fan, but I did recognise that he was delivering what he promised. He was recruited because the Swans recognised that we couldn't waste Goodes' talents by playing him as a permanent full-forward. Tippett promised a strong-marking 40 goal-a-season forward, and we were happy to pay big bucks for that. And, until the injuries wore him down, that's exactly what he delivered. The Swans' Tippett turned out to be very similar to the Crows' Tippett - surprise, surprise!
Tippett's biggest problem was that he always tried to do more than that, crashing packs, laying tackles, and making second and third efforts. And that's when he got injured, and sometimes stupidly played with injuries, which ultimately ruined his career.

Comment