This year showed how much we missed tippet. The deal was fine. He got us to two grand finals, and we very nearly won one.
Tippett!!
Collapse
X
-
Yep, and I believe it's really a situation of the club's own making (not the injury/retirement, just the finances). From what I can gather Kurt was tempted over with that big 4 years, circa $1 million p.a. contract, within which we included performance incentives. Kurt met those incentives, which triggered a 2 year extension at the end of 2016 (so would have then finished this season). That didn't seem to work for us any longer $ wise, presumably in large part thanks to having Buddy come over, and we know Kurt agreed to switch from 2 years at a large amount p.a. to 4 years at a presumably reduced amount p.a.Depends on what was negotiated between players and their clubs. Rioli sounds like he unilaterally decided to retire, in which case he’s probably not entitled to any further payments. On the other hand, I suspect Tippett got a little nudge from the Swans, which probably entailed a negotiated payout.
If the circa $1 million p.a. original figure is pretty much true (I assume it is, give or take about 10%), then Kurt probably left a fair bit of money per year on the table to switch over to 4 years- I doubt he would have been kind enough to go from 2y/$2m to 4y/$2m- I imagine it would be somewhere around 4y/$2.5-3m.
When it came to discussing retirement and contract buy out those in the room would have been perfectly aware of the situation, and I think it's reasonable for Kurt to receive a hefty payout for those final few years.I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
Told youse 269 pages ago Tipoff was going to cost us!!!
His contract was front-ended.Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.Comment
-
If it wasn’t front ended, we might not have got him
- - - Updated - - -
Your best postComment
-
Comment
-
Now that is very good news. Not only in regard to cap space but also, I assume, this means he will be off the list giving us a list space as well.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Kurt Tippett Statement - sydneyswans.com.au
Interesting snippet regarding the intended rookie-listing of Tippett. This suggests that the club has remaining payment obligations to Tippett that they can't afford to bear in the 2018 salary cap.
I don't really understand the rules around what part of a rookie contract is included in the salary cap. I presume none (if they are not playing). It does seem like a bit of a ruse to massage the salary cap by putting outstanding obligations outside the cap. That said, the Swans are not the only club taking advantage of this apparent loophole.Comment

Comment