Now for ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BillyRayCypress
    On the Rookie List
    • May 2012
    • 1379

    #91
    Jesse is like Bette, he gets better as he gets older.

    It was great to see him use some of his aggression on Saturday night and his tackling and second efforts would have been noted.
    Nothing like a good light bulb moment.

    Comment

    • stellation
      scott names the planets
      • Sep 2003
      • 9723

      #92
      Originally posted by BillyRayCypress
      Jesse is like Bette, he gets better as he gets older.

      It was great to see him use some of his aggression on Saturday night and his tackling and second efforts would have been noted.
      How good was it to see Kizza, head down and beaten as Crowley got into him- and it was big Jesse that made sure he got some respite. It wasn't just aggression, it was, god forbid I say it, LEADERSHIP!
      I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
      We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

      Comment

      • BillyRayCypress
        On the Rookie List
        • May 2012
        • 1379

        #93
        Originally posted by stellation
        How good was it to see Kizza, head down and beaten as Crowley got into him- and it was big Jesse that made sure he got some respite. It wasn't just aggression, it was, god forbid I say it, LEADERSHIP!
        Very good point and I hadn't thought of it that. You're right. Took the mongrel by the scruff.
        Nothing like a good light bulb moment.

        Comment

        • Matt80
          Suspended by the MRP
          • Sep 2013
          • 1802

          #94
          Jesse for the Leadership Group?

          Comment

          • crackedactor
            Regular in the Side
            • May 2012
            • 919

            #95
            de list

            Originally posted by Matt80
            Jesse for the Leadership Group?
            I liked it that Jesse gave a bit back to Crowley. Surprised it was Jesse and not Mummy or one of the others, so maybe White has leadership qualities? We have lost Mattner, Morton and Bolton , now who will be de-listed?? Maybe Dick, Brown, lockyer, Everitt, Armstrong, Marsh or maybe a tap on the shoulder might to given to Shaw or LRT due to Injuries. What about rookies, Lylod, Naismith and Robinson? We will hold onto both Mummy and White? Many questions ahead.

            Comment

            • MightyBloods
              Regular in the Side
              • Feb 2012
              • 532

              #96
              Originally posted by stellation
              How good was it to see Kizza, head down and beaten as Crowley got into him- and it was big Jesse that made sure he got some respite. It wasn't just aggression, it was, god forbid I say it, LEADERSHIP!
              Very good! and it wasn't the only instance. Jesse has been standing up over the past weeks in similar incidents. I see it as a sign of confidence and a sense of belonging. It can do wonders for any player.

              Comment

              • Ludwig
                Veterans List
                • Apr 2007
                • 9359

                #97
                Originally posted by crackedactor
                I liked it that Jesse gave a bit back to Crowley. Surprised it was Jesse and not Mummy or one of the others, so maybe White has leadership qualities? We have lost Mattner, Morton and Bolton , now who will be de-listed?? Maybe Dick, Brown, lockyer, Everitt, Armstrong, Marsh or maybe a tap on the shoulder might to given to Shaw or LRT due to Injuries. What about rookies, Lylod, Naismith and Robinson? We will hold onto both Mummy and White? Many questions ahead.
                It seems possible that no one will be delisted. Most are still under contract. All of the rookies played well. Lloyd and Robinson both made the NEAFL team of the year and look likely prospects, especially Lloyd. Of the seniors, Armstrong and Walsh seem most likely, but both are contracted for next year.

                Comment

                • Matt80
                  Suspended by the MRP
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 1802

                  #98
                  Would Lockyer and Brown still be under contract? Two seasons is the minimum contract term after being drafted through the NAB AFL Draft!

                  Comment

                  • R-1
                    Senior Player
                    • Aug 2005
                    • 1042

                    #99
                    Given the 3 retirements I'm sort of expecting we won't delist anyone except maybe one or two of the out of contact draftees. If we think we've got the ability to develop or trade for defenders over the next couple of years, I don't think we need to bring in more talent from the draft beyon Perris and two live picks.

                    And if Mumford or White goes we'll either get a pick or a player for them and still won't need to delist anyone.

                    Comment

                    • jono2707
                      Goes up to 11
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 3326

                      Originally posted by Matt80
                      Would Lockyer and Brown still be under contract? Two seasons is the minimum contract term after being drafted through the NAB AFL Draft!
                      These would be the two most likely to go IF we were to delist anyone further. Lockyer promised a bit early but was a bit disappointing for most of his time on the, although he seemed much improved by the end of this year. We were hearing good things about Brown this year and he seems to be a promising defender, and would deserve another year on the list. But this is a tough business and one or both could still be cut. Would be sad but that's the way it goes in this business sometimes....

                      Comment

                      • BillyRayCypress
                        On the Rookie List
                        • May 2012
                        • 1379

                        Someone has to be delisted. It hasn't happened before. A total of 4 will go one way or another. Following from previous years.
                        Nothing like a good light bulb moment.

                        Comment

                        • Ludwig
                          Veterans List
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 9359

                          Originally posted by BillyRayCypress
                          Someone has to be delisted. It hasn't happened before. A total of 4 will go one way or another. Following from previous years.
                          It would seem so, but of the out of contract players Daniel Robinson is probably the most likely, but he's had a great year and was even in the NEAFL team of the year. He looks a likely type. The size of an inside midfielder with the skills of an outside mid. He really knows how to find a goal.

                          As it stands now, with no delistings, we will only be able to use our first 2 picks, meaning something around pick #50 goes unused. Not a disaster.

                          Comment

                          • Nico
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 11343

                            I thought we had to have space on draft day to draft 3 players. Whether we pass or not we must have 35 on the list come draft day.
                            http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                            Comment

                            • Ludwig
                              Veterans List
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 9359

                              Originally posted by Nico
                              I thought we had to have space on draft day to draft 3 players. Whether we pass or not we must have 35 on the list come draft day.
                              The third draft spot can be used to draft Lloyd Perris or elevated a rookie. Rampe seems certain to be elevated.

                              Comment

                              Working...