Mummy Crosses the Bridge
Collapse
X
-
-
And where do you get your information about the deal that the Swans offered. Most reports indicate the Swans never really made him an offer. And now we have some idea of why.Comment
-
- - - Updated - - -
[QUOTE=liz;626589]Not sure about your sources of information, When we recruited him from Geelong, the deal was reported as $1m over 4 years (ie $250k a year) and even that caused an uproar that we were overpaying because he was on the Cats' rookie list at the time, earning next to nothing.
And where do you get your information about the deal that the Swans offered. Most reports indicate the Swans never really made him an offer. And now we have some idea of why.[/QUOTE}
The deal that was offered him was $600,000/yr over 3 years but he turned it down as he wanted a 4 year contract according to Melbourne Journos. This has been on the news for a while on SEN in MelbourneComment
-
Sorry but you are wrong. We have to give something to the Hawks as he is a Restricted free Agent. The Hawks can make an offer and if not successful then the league decide the compensation Hawks will get. The same applies to GWS in the Mummy deal. We can offer him an altermative deal but if he turns us down we have the right to compensation. But both Hawks and Swans should not hold their collective breaths as the compensation so far has been pretty feeble.
- - - Updated - - -
As for Mummy, we could always offer him a contract, but if he wants to go to GWS they can get him through the PSD pick 1, and we would get nothing for him. We can hope for something by doing a trade, but GWS has all the cards, except the one that says that they may want to remain on good trading terms with the Swans. As Mummy is not a free agent, there is no AFL compensation for the Swans.Comment
-
Ludwig, do you know if "match the offer' means pre COLA (which logically it should) or post the add-on of COLA? That is, could Hawthorn keep Buddy paying less in total than the Swans' offer with the difference being the COLA which is not paid in Melbourne?Comment
-
The COLA never comes into consideration. I think it has to be matched for both money and length of contract, but I am not sure in the year to year detail as well.Comment
-
Sorry but you are wrong. We have to give something to the Hawks as he is a Restricted free Agent. The Hawks can make an offer and if not successful then the league decide the compensation Hawks will get. The same applies to GWS in the Mummy deal. We can offer him an altermative deal but if he turns us down we have the right to compensation. But both Hawks and Swans should not hold their collective breaths as the compensation so far has been pretty feeble."I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005Comment
-
Good on Mummy for getting a good deal at GWS. I certainly don't have any issues there with him. He gave us a great 4 years service, including playing as part of a Premiership team. Can't fault his committment to the cause, and I hope he does well (except for when playing against us) for GWS."You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
Sorry but you are wrong. We have to give something to the Hawks as he is a Restricted free Agent. The Hawks can make an offer and if not successful then the league decide the compensation Hawks will get. The same applies to GWS in the Mummy deal. We can offer him an altermative deal but if he turns us down we have the right to compensation. But both Hawks and Swans should not hold their collective breaths as the compensation so far has been pretty feeble.Nothing like a good light bulb moment.Comment
-
This will make us look pretty silly if for whatever reason the Franklin deal doesnt go through.He ate more cheese, than time allowedComment
-
TWR saying Mumford will be on at 10:40 am.
They then bagged the Swans for not giving him a contract and being disrespectful of what he did for the Swans
If the Swans advertised that they were only giving Mummy 2 years then this would have been a red flag to everyone else that he had a possible serious problem.Last edited by BillyRayCypress; 3 October 2013, 09:55 AM.Nothing like a good light bulb moment.Comment
-
Thanks. I'm still not clear about this. To clarify (and using simple figure for example): if Swans offer was $1mill + COLA of $100,000 - to match offer does Hawthorn have to offer $1mill or $1.1mill?Comment
Comment