Show us who's boss

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mcsquirta
    Warming the Bench
    • Jul 2014
    • 110

    Show us who's boss

    ...Swans chairman Andrew Pridham tells Gillon McLachlan.
    "The AFL should have views on things and they should be strong. We're relying on them to run the game and we can't have a perception that they're running the game for Victorian clubs, or one particular club. They've got to run it for the good of the entire competition."
    Show us who's boss, Swans chairman Andrew Pridham tells Gillon McLachlan | The Grenfell Record

    I really like Andrew. He seems like a no-fuss guy, but he doesn't take anything lying down - and he calls a 'spade' a 'front-end loader'. Good on him.
  • Melbourne_Blood
    Senior Player
    • May 2010
    • 3312

    #2
    Eddies will have a field day with this. " this blokes been in the job two seconds and he's telling the CEO of the AFL how to do his job, fair dinkum , these Sydney blokes have no shame!" Personally I like it though, good Onya Andrew!

    Comment

    • undy
      Fatal error: Allowed memo
      • Mar 2003
      • 1231

      #3
      Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
      Eddies will have a field day with this. " this blokes been in the job two seconds and he's telling the CEO of the AFL how to do his job, fair dinkum , these Sydney blokes have no shame!"
      Too right, the confected outrage coupled with a Rudd-like prediliction for gratuitous strine is Eddie to a tee. Ripper.
      Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.

      Comment

      • Mug Punter
        On the Rookie List
        • Nov 2009
        • 3325

        #4
        Originally posted by mcsquirta
        ...Swans chairman Andrew Pridham tells Gillon McLachlan.

        Show us who's boss, Swans chairman Andrew Pridham tells Gillon McLachlan | The Grenfell Record

        I really like Andrew. He seems like a no-fuss guy, but he doesn't take anything lying down - and he calls a 'spade' a 'front-end loader'. Good on him.
        Of course he is 100% spot on.

        We're not asking for anything, we are just asking the AFL to honour their commitment to the game.

        And who gives a flying toss what Eddie says in response.

        Comment

        • Matt80
          Suspended by the MRP
          • Sep 2013
          • 1802

          #5
          I don't know about this.

          Gill has just started and does not want to be firing his guns and rocking every boat until he has his bearings. Many CEOs start slowly and get a good feel of there stakeholders before making big decisions.

          What Gill does not need is management advice from the Swans President through the media. Leave those conversations on the privacy of the Telephone. Gill will not like this feedback going public.

          The article gets the people on red and white excited, but he needs to win the political game at AFL house. I don't think this interview will help us at AFL house.

          Along with a no-show to Gill's coaches dinner I think the Swans have started on the wrong foot with Gill.

          A bit of Schmoozing and Charm from the Swans would not go astray at AFl House.

          Comment

          • CureTheSane
            Carpe Noctem
            • Jan 2003
            • 5032

            #6
            I like it.
            If McLachlan doesn't stand up soon, we could be witnessing the beginning of the end for him.
            What do they say when you get sent to jail? go up and smack the toughest guy and let everyone know you won't be anyone's whipping boy...
            The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

            Comment

            • Mel_C
              Veterans List
              • Jan 2003
              • 4470

              #7
              Originally posted by Matt80
              I don't know about this.

              Gill has just started and does not want to be firing his guns and rocking every boat until he has his bearings. Many CEOs start slowly and get a good feel of there stakeholders before making big decisions.

              What Gill does not need is management advice from the Swans President through the media. Leave those conversations on the privacy of the Telephone. Gill will not like this feedback going public.

              The article gets the people on red and white excited, but he needs to win the political game at AFL house. I don't think this interview will help us at AFL house.

              Along with a no-show to Gill's coaches dinner I think the Swans have started on the wrong foot with Gill.

              A bit of Schmoozing and Charm from the Swans would not go astray at AFl House.
              I agree Matt that this should have been a private conversation between Pridham and Gill but I have a feeling that he has already discussed this with Gill but there has been no public comment/support so he is frustrated. And it's not just the academy issue but the cola issue as well.

              Comment

              • ernie koala
                Senior Player
                • May 2007
                • 3251

                #8
                Originally posted by Matt80
                I don't know about this.

                Gill has just started and does not want to be firing his guns and rocking every boat until he has his bearings. Many CEOs start slowly and get a good feel of there stakeholders before making big decisions.

                What Gill does not need is management advice from the Swans President through the media. Leave those conversations on the privacy of the Telephone. Gill will not like this feedback going public.

                The article gets the people on red and white excited, but he needs to win the political game at AFL house. I don't think this interview will help us at AFL house.

                Along with a no-show to Gill's coaches dinner I think the Swans have started on the wrong foot with Gill.

                A bit of Schmoozing and Charm from the Swans would not go astray at AFl House.

                Yep, while we all agree with him here at Swans central, making these types of public statements, about how someone else(the boss) should go about their job, is counter productive .
                Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                Comment

                • bodgie
                  Regular in the Side
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 501

                  #9
                  You have to get a bit vocal when the leadership is mute on defending important principles and aims of a national league.

                  Comment

                  • dimelb
                    pr. dim-melb; m not f
                    • Jun 2003
                    • 6889

                    #10
                    I agree that the conversation should have stayed private, but it is not an ideal world atm and it is not a good idea to allow Eddie McLiar sole possession of the media.
                    He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                    Comment

                    • Zlatorog
                      Senior Player
                      • Jan 2006
                      • 1748

                      #11
                      I believe that people are missing a point about why Andrew needed to do this interview. I think that he is afraid that some of that mud that Eddie is throwing at Sydney Swans might stuck and people in Sydney (or NSW) start believing that the Swans are doing something against the rules. I'm not sure if Mike Baird is an AFL supporter, I know he was at the GWS game in R15, but all this mud throwing at our club could be used by the government as an excuse to prop another code in NSW instead. I know it looks far fetched, but think about it. Which code now offers pretty even club representation in the league from all states?

                      Comment

                      • ShockOfHair
                        One Man Out
                        • Dec 2007
                        • 3668

                        #12
                        After the outrage of the secretive decision to change the draft rules mid-season, his comments were quite measured. He's addressing the underlying issue which is the AFL allowing itself to be directed by McGuire and the other rich clubs. I'm sure he's made the same points privately. By pitching it this way he's also appealing to the middle-ranking and smaller clubs whose concerns about the influence of the large clubs would surely override their misgivings over the academy draft rules. It's in the interest of those clubs to communicate the same message to McLachlan.

                        Football politics....
                        The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

                        Comment

                        • mcsquirta
                          Warming the Bench
                          • Jul 2014
                          • 110

                          #13
                          I see there's been a minor update to the article which added
                          +Read Andrew Pridham's exclusive interview with Samantha Lane in Saturday's Age
                          It should be interesting to see the context in which his comments were made (if the full interview isn't overly edited).

                          I think it's a fair call to publicly ask for a bit of strong, independent leadership from the AFL, though. After all they are the governing body of the game and, Especially with a new CEO, people need to know if we've got a Bob Hawke or a Tony Abbott at the helm

                          Like he says,
                          "The AFL should have views on things and they should be strong. We're relying on them to run the game and we can't have a perception that they're running the game for Victorian clubs, or one particular club. They've got to run it for the good of the entire competition."
                          At a time when McGuire is going in boots and all with his own "anti-equalisation agenda", if Gillon wants to engender confidence in his leadership then he has to get off to a flying start. Feeling his way slowly into the job isn't any way to achieve this. After all, Andrew is in a similar boat - new to the job - but in his short time he's made the decision to not allow the Swans to be pushed around - or at least, not without a fight.

                          I'm looking forward to reading the whole interview, and am especially looking forward to Adelaide smashing Collingwood too! Cheer Cheer!!

                          Comment

                          • Matt80
                            Suspended by the MRP
                            • Sep 2013
                            • 1802

                            #14
                            Originally posted by ShockOfHair
                            After the outrage of the secretive decision to change the draft rules mid-season, his comments were quite measured. He's addressing the underlying issue which is the AFL allowing itself to be directed by McGuire and the other rich clubs. I'm sure he's made the same points privately. By pitching it this way he's also appealing to the middle-ranking and smaller clubs whose concerns about the influence of the large clubs would surely override their misgivings over the academy draft rules. It's in the interest of those clubs to communicate the same message to McLachlan.

                            Football politics....
                            I still believe these things should not be played through the media.

                            Eddie attacks the issues, but never mentions the AFL in prosecuting the issues. Eddie then meets with the AFL and I?m sure he is a thoroughly charming individual behind the closed doors. He does meet the AFL having swayed public opinion to his cause, which is powerful.

                            Pildrim should be working behind the scenes and building bridges with the other three Northern Clubs. The four Northern Presidents should be having joint meetings with Gillion and Dillion and putting through the arguments in favour of the Academy systems.
                            By all means Pildrim can publicly put through his arguments as to why the Academies are in the best interest of the greater game, but don?t publicly tell the AFL how to do its job.

                            Gillion has been in the job a short time and the situation is not at the point where you need to make public statements about his approach to the job.

                            If there arguments are strong enough in favour of the academies then we will win. Gillion is from a business strategy background and I believe he has the capacity to make decisions based on sound logic not populist backflips. Give the guy a chance.

                            Comment

                            • Conor_Dillon
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Jun 2013
                              • 1224

                              #15
                              Think you mean Pridham! Sorry to be a spelling-Nazi.
                              Twitter @cmdil
                              Instagram @conordillon

                              Comment

                              Working...